IQ and Politics

[Nash]

Originally posted by Widewing
Nice rant Nash, too bad your grasp of history is so lacking.

Not my rant...

I linked to it in another post, but nobody seemed to take the bait.

it's http://www.shreckthesouth.com  <---replace the 'e' with a 'u'.

Practically every second word he uses is linked to something... so if you've got a prollem with the facts of it, have a look and maybe he clarifies it. Not sure in this case.

[Widewing]

Originally posted by Nash
Not my rant...

I linked to it in another post, but nobody seemed to take the bait.

it's http://www.shreckthesouth.com  <---replace the 'e' with a 'u'.

Practically every second word he uses is linked to something... so if you've got a prollem with the facts of it, have a look and maybe he clarifies it. Not sure in this case.

Be careful using some other idiots nonsense like that. Guilt by association is an accepted practice in this world.

My regards,

widewing

[RTStuka]

Originally posted by Nash
Not my rant...

I linked to it in another post, but nobody seemed to take the bait.

it's http://www.shreckthesouth.com  <---replace the 'e' with a 'u'.

Practically every second word he uses is linked to something... so if you've got a prollem with the facts of it, have a look and maybe he clarifies it. Not sure in this case.

HAHA when I wish you hadnt gone and spoiled all the fun Nash, I was really enjoying all these guys going off on you because they thought you wrote it. To me this thing sounds like a Conservitive nut gone liberal nut lol.

Oh and Lazs2 just so you know, wich im sure you do, its possible slavery would have been around alot longer. The only reason slavery became an issue in the first place was to keep the British from helping the South. Also Lincoln was using it as a tactic to bolster morale and support from the north along with bringing in new men. Once the war took on the notion of slavery the Brits could not join in and help the south because they were against slavery.

[Shuckins]

While Nash may have posted it in fun...I assume that at some level he agreed with it...for in past articles he has waded in on that side of the north/South argument.  Ergo, one could interpret his post as a "troll," or a line drawn in the sand.

[Nash]

Out of curiousity, what difference does it make to you?

[lazs2]

nash or something he read?   you are what you read.. especialy if you read the things nash does.   I mean... the guy has to be put in restraint in order to read that burnout hunter thompson or he will hurt himself from the laughter spasms.  

lazs