« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: buh bye Dan  (Read 1079 times)

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
buh bye Dan
« on: November 23, 2004, 11:22:45 AM »
Logged

Offline Flit

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1035
buh bye Dan
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2004, 11:39:32 AM »
good riddence
Logged

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
buh bye Dan
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2004, 12:15:15 PM »
Can he take that Dumbarse Geraldo with him?

:D
Logged

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
buh bye Dan
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2004, 01:07:48 PM »
good riddance of the liar....

maybe a charge of attempted election fraud would be a nice parting gift...
Logged
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
buh bye Dan
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2004, 01:29:34 PM »


But....But...But....I belong here......


:rofl
Logged

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
buh bye Dan
« Reply #5 on: November 23, 2004, 01:39:42 PM »
10 to 1 that if kerrie had won he woulda stayed.

lazs
Logged

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
buh bye Dan
« Reply #6 on: November 23, 2004, 01:51:05 PM »
What? No outrage that Brokaw and Koppel are retiring, too?:rolleyes:
Logged
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
buh bye Dan
« Reply #7 on: November 23, 2004, 02:08:03 PM »
I'm outraged that Brokaw and Koppel are retiring!

There ya go RPM.
Logged
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
buh bye Dan
« Reply #8 on: November 23, 2004, 02:17:35 PM »
Thanks Holden.:)
Logged
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
buh bye Dan
« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2004, 02:24:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Flit
good riddence
Why don't you like him?

The anchorpersons I remember when I lived there were Dan Rather, Fahey Flynn, Ted Koppel, Sam Donaldson, Linda Yu, Connie Chung - hehe, always remember the Kathleen Gingrich debacle. :lol A lot of those anchorpersons still seem to be around.
Logged

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
buh bye Dan
« Reply #10 on: November 23, 2004, 02:43:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by beet1e
Why don't you like him?

The anchorpersons I remember when I lived there were Dan Rather, Fahey Flynn, Ted Koppel, Sam Donaldson, Linda Yu, Connie Chung - hehe, always remember the Kathleen Gingrich debacle. :lol A lot of those anchorpersons still seem to be around.


Because they didn't report the news...they slanted the wording, raised an eyebrow at the right time, basically pulled a Goebells in the name of their own political party.  Most news anchors today on the major networks are guilty of it.  Thus, my philosophy of "Get as much news from as many sources available, sort through all the crap, and make the decision yourself of what is reported correctly, and what isn't."
Logged

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
buh bye Dan
« Reply #11 on: November 23, 2004, 03:38:16 PM »
beetle... all of those anchors and talking heads you named are one of the reasons I quit watching the news at all....  they all had the same liberal bias and could be trusted only in that they would taint whatever story came across their desk.... sometimes as blatantly as Blather did.

Now... I watch when something big is happening... war, election...  9/11 but we have fox news.   Fox is about as biased as the liberal news shows but to the conservative side.

It is now possible to get "fair and balanced"  by simply switching back and forth between fox and one of the other liberal stations and..... after discarding the  top 10% of blatant agenda crap.... pick a middle ground between the two.

that is fox's contribution.... all those old talking heads contributed nothing but the continuance of the status quo.

lazs
Logged

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
buh bye Dan
« Reply #12 on: November 23, 2004, 03:38:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Because they didn't report the news...they slanted the wording, raised an eyebrow at the right time, basically pulled a Goebells in the name of their own political party.  Most news anchors today on the major networks are guilty of it.  Thus, my philosophy of "Get as much news from as many sources available, sort through all the crap, and make the decision yourself of what is reported correctly, and what isn't."

In other words, they did'nt have the opinion you wanted. Watch Fox, read Drudge and Newsmax for the correct opinion and proper eyebrow raising.
Logged
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9920
buh bye Dan
« Reply #13 on: November 23, 2004, 03:39:41 PM »
The BBC still gives pretty flat delivery.
Logged

Offline CAVY

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 215
Re: buh bye Dan
« Reply #14 on: November 23, 2004, 04:00:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ra
Rather going away.



Take it easy ya liberal piece of S**T
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »