Author Topic: Legal implications of smilies (Read 575 times)

Neubob · « **Reply #16 on:** November 27, 2004, 08:15:24 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by BenDover

"lazs smilie and liberal gun control thread smilie in one room, with baseball bat"

Arlo · « **Reply #17 on:** November 27, 2004, 08:21:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Neubob
I wish we could petition skuzzy to get rid of 'Mr. Thumbs up'

It would take the wind out of the sails of so many annoying posts.

So it DOES seem to serve a purpose ... to some.

Neubob · « **Reply #18 on:** November 27, 2004, 08:23:41 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Arlo
So it DOES seem to serve a purpose ... to some.

I think that moreso than anything else, it begs the question of where that thumb was a minute earlier.

Airhead · « **Reply #19 on:** November 27, 2004, 09:08:18 PM »

Arlo loves to ridicule the unwashed masses, but for some smilies is all they have- it is a universal language even the illeterate can understand.

I say up with smilies.

streetstang · « **Reply #20 on:** November 27, 2004, 09:42:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by beet1e

Perfect example of the gheyness.

Neubob · « **Reply #21 on:** November 27, 2004, 10:37:45 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by beet1e

Smilie equivalent of a dirty sanchez.

Arlo · « **Reply #22 on:** November 28, 2004, 12:32:55 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Neubob
I think that moreso than anything else, it begs the question of where that thumb was a minute earlier.

In a pie. What ... are you daft? Plumb, baybee!

Neubob · « **Reply #23 on:** November 28, 2004, 01:44:14 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Arlo
In a pie.

Is that what it's being called these days?

Dammit, not even out of my 20s and already behind the times.