Author Topic: NOW I understand...  (Read 3305 times)

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
NOW I understand...
« Reply #90 on: December 09, 2004, 07:35:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve
Thrawn, your politics are so far left of center tha tthey're off the page, whackjob.

You have no idea how much of a capitalist I am, fruitcake.



I'M BIGGER CAPILIST THAN ANY OF YOU! :mad:

Offline Maniac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3817
NOW I understand...
« Reply #91 on: December 09, 2004, 07:38:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Staga
I'M BIGGER CAPILIST THAN ANY OF YOU! :mad:


Go to bed allready ;)
Warbirds handle : nr-1 //// -nr-1- //// Maniac

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
NOW I understand...
« Reply #92 on: December 09, 2004, 08:44:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Staga
I'M BIGGER CAPILIST THAN ANY OF YOU! :mad:


Nice Communist accent there Stalin...
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
NOW I understand...
« Reply #93 on: December 09, 2004, 09:04:41 PM »
Nothing says a bright future more than endless bi-partisan jacking off.

Offline Steve

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
NOW I understand...
« Reply #94 on: December 09, 2004, 11:04:17 PM »
Bite the pillow Arlo, I'm almost there.
Member: Hot Soup Mafia - Cream of Myshroom
Army of Muppets  Yes, my ingame name is Steve

Offline Airhead

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
      • http://www.ouchytheclown.com
NOW I understand...
« Reply #95 on: December 09, 2004, 11:06:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve
Bite the pillow Arlo, I'm almost there.


Ah...so you are in favor of gay marriage then, huh, Steve?

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
NOW I understand...
« Reply #96 on: December 09, 2004, 11:17:23 PM »
You say ya wanna revoluuuuution ... wellll, ya know ..... ya gotta be careful what ya wish for ......

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
NOW I understand...
« Reply #97 on: December 10, 2004, 04:49:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bodhi
Nice Communist accent there Stalin...


Sorry Bodhi; You won't find any communist or even socialist from this family but if you like the idea then keep it and have fun with it :)

Offline Steve

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
NOW I understand...
« Reply #98 on: December 10, 2004, 10:35:08 AM »
Actually Airhead, I have no issue w/ gay marriage other than I do not think a gay couple should be allowed to adopt.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2004, 10:43:37 AM by Steve »
Member: Hot Soup Mafia - Cream of Myshroom
Army of Muppets  Yes, my ingame name is Steve

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
NOW I understand...
« Reply #99 on: December 10, 2004, 10:40:31 AM »
so airhead... other than a nationwide background check and the regestration of every single firearm.... you have no other gun control restrictions?

lazs

Offline Airhead

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
      • http://www.ouchytheclown.com
NOW I understand...
« Reply #100 on: December 10, 2004, 10:54:57 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
so airhead... other than a nationwide background check and the regestration of every single firearm.... you have no other gun control restrictions?

lazs


Increased penalties for gun crime, Lazs...that's about it. Penalties for participating in the "underground" gun trade maybe...Personally I have no problem with a waiting period. I don't know how many felons it's prevented from buying guns, but if it's prevented any at all, then why not?  Other than that my feeling on firearms is that I benefit by being allowed to posess firearms whether I actually own any or not. Your ownership of firearms acts as a deterrant to home invaders and burgulars, and the chance of your firearm being used against me is astronomical.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
NOW I understand...
« Reply #101 on: December 10, 2004, 11:05:02 AM »
I agree on the penalties but don't consider them a gun restriction...  I have a problem with regestration as I don't really see how it prevents anything... sorta like the failed ammo regestration scheme a few decades back.... I am also not comfortable having government know exactly what tools I own to keep them in line and where to pick them up if they decide to.

Waiting periods?   not a big deal unless you need a gun right away... there are several cases of women being killed while waiting for their firearm by husbands or boyfriends who have threatened them and had restraining orders filed against them.   If a waiting period causes the death of even one person it's a bad idea.

instant background checks?  no problem.   depending of course on what you are checking for.  

probly tho... I could live with your restrictions if they weren't abused.    I don't trust governmment to not abuse restrictions tho.

lazs

Offline Airhead

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
      • http://www.ouchytheclown.com
NOW I understand...
« Reply #102 on: December 11, 2004, 10:55:02 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
I agree on the penalties but don't consider them a gun restriction...  I have a problem with regestration as I don't really see how it prevents anything... sorta like the failed ammo regestration scheme a few decades back.... I am also not comfortable having government know exactly what tools I own to keep them in line and where to pick them up if they decide to.

Waiting periods?   not a big deal unless you need a gun right away... there are several cases of women being killed while waiting for their firearm by husbands or boyfriends who have threatened them and had restraining orders filed against them.   If a waiting period causes the death of even one person it's a bad idea.

instant background checks?  no problem.   depending of course on what you are checking for.  

probly tho... I could live with your restrictions if they weren't abused.    I don't trust governmment to not abuse restrictions tho.

lazs


Quicker Goverment response is something I'd like to see too- it took 120 days to get a DofJ security clearance recently. But to have a quicker beaucratic response might require more beaucrats...

Offline WhiteHawk

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1815
NOW I understand...
« Reply #103 on: December 11, 2004, 11:25:04 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve
Wow Bodhi, you are dragging the biggest whackjobs out of the weeds.  I agree that the liberal left, like Thrawn, RPM, and their ilk are dangerous to anyone who wants to keep the money they earn.  I'm just not convinced that my friend Airhead is off the charts to the left like  the heretofore mentioned whackos.


Well, I hate to jump into this one but I just cant resist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(CBS/AP) President Bush signed legislation on Friday raising the government's debt limit by $800 billion and clearing the way for Congress to send him an overdue $388 billion spending bill to finance most federal agencies.

The new federal borrowing cap is $8.18 trillion; that's 70 percent the size of the entire U.S. economy, and more than $2.4 trillion higher than the debt Mr. Bush inherited upon taking office in 2001.

The House approved the debt-limit measure Thursday by a near party line 208-204 vote. Its passage was not in doubt because the alternative was a jarring federal default, but it was nonetheless a battlefield for partisan fingerpointing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Steve, who is going to pay for this?

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
NOW I understand...
« Reply #104 on: December 11, 2004, 12:52:50 PM »
What do you mean who's going to pay? Government of course, are you saying individual Americans should pay that debt? :aok