Author Topic: Those silly La judges... (Read 722 times)

Red Tail 444 · « **on:** December 14, 2004, 10:41:02 AM »

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,141444,00.html

Just another attack from the liberal media....

AKIron · « **Reply #1 on:** December 14, 2004, 10:48:21 AM »

I don't get it. Did he wear it to court or a private halloween party? Big brother is watching.

Pooh21 · « **Reply #2 on:** December 14, 2004, 11:43:16 AM »

didnt Wayan Brothers or something make a whole movie dressed as white chicks?

Maverick · « **Reply #3 on:** December 14, 2004, 12:02:12 PM »

It's really very simple. It's holding a judge to a higher standard of behavior both on and off the bench. Since the same type of situation is applied to other public officials I don't have a problem with him being sanctioned. Why should a judge be exempt? I think the sanction might have been a bit severe for a one time "offense" especially since the article didn't even claim an offended third party.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #4 on:** December 14, 2004, 12:10:30 PM »

I would apllaud such a decsion by the LA suprreme court had this incident actually happrened, however, seeing as this story is sourced from Faux news I simply refuse to belive it until it is relayed to me by Dan Rather or the NYT...

BTW Red Tail, you being the librul type and all arent you surprised that evil republican racist Focx news even shows this story?

lazs2 · « **Reply #5 on:** December 15, 2004, 08:32:53 AM »

red bottom is ever dillegent and hyper sensitive on anything that can even be in the slightest way considered to be "racial".

lazs

Red Tail 444 · « **Reply #6 on:** December 15, 2004, 10:59:11 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
I would apllaud such a decsion by the LA suprreme court had this incident actually happrened, however, seeing as this story is sourced from Faux news I simply refuse to belive it until it is relayed to me by Dan Rather or the NYT...

BTW Red Tail, you being the librul type and all arent you surprised that evil republican racist Focx news even shows this story?

No, I actually watch a lot of programs on Fox news channel...I watch and read as many different news sources as I can, since not one entity should be a sole news sourse, if you really want to know the whole story.

Pooh, are you comparing a judge to the Wayans brothers? One is a representative of the court system, the other are actors, who no one should take seriously.

As for Lazs...I hope you didnt trip over your own two feet on your mad rush into this thread

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #7 on:** December 15, 2004, 11:38:12 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Red Tail 444
No, I actually watch a lot of programs on Fox news channel..l

Seriously? How can you stand it? I'm more of a conservative leaning type and I cant stand that channel for more than a few minutes, I mean seconds...

Gunslinger · « **Reply #8 on:** December 15, 2004, 01:06:55 PM »

Quote

The justices agreed Ellender did not mean to insult blacks. Nevertheless, they ordered him to take a sociology course "which will assist him in achieving a greater understanding of racial sensitivity."

Ummm shouldnt that be enough.

He didn't intend to but he MIGHT HAVE but there was no ill will or malice there BUT SOMONE MIGHT BE OFFENDED.

This is BS!

Red Tail 444 · « **Reply #9 on:** December 15, 2004, 02:31:03 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Seriously? How can you stand it? I'm more of a conservative leaning type and I cant stand that channel for more than a few minutes, I mean seconds...

They have some elements of truth...I can't really watch or listen to NPR for an extended period of time, either. I can do without all the shouting and childish BS, but some of the stuff is digestable.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #10 on:** December 15, 2004, 02:35:54 PM »

I'm not talking about them being truthful or not, I'm talking abut them being just plain awful to watch...

Red Tail 444 · « **Reply #11 on:** December 15, 2004, 02:37:42 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
Ummm shouldnt that be enough.

He didn't intend to but he MIGHT HAVE but there was no ill will or malice there BUT SOMONE MIGHT BE OFFENDED.

This is BS!

If you wore something like that, it wouldn't matter, as I wouldn't expect much more from you, since you're a commoner, like all of us.

but if you were a general, or someone who society holds in a higher regard, then the penalty should reflect that. he should have known better.

If a principal of a school, a priest, or president of a llarge college went to the same costume party as our CIC or CINCPAC in an insulting or derogatory way, would you feel the same way?

6 months is fair, he can sit home and think about things, maybe even sew his own Uncle Ben's costume for next year's event.

wombatt · « **Reply #12 on:** December 15, 2004, 02:38:52 PM »

Indeed big brother is watching.
That is total bullcrap.
What he did on his own time is his buisness.

Now that being said what he did was a huge slap in the face to all african americans.
To say the it was in bad taste would be an understatement.

Red Tail 444 · « **Reply #13 on:** December 15, 2004, 02:42:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
He didn't intend to but he MIGHT HAVE

Well, your honor, I didn't MEAN to harm anyone, think you can let me off the hook?

Where's all that tough talk? You sound almost .......as oneof your ilk might say.."woman-like"...in your defense

Airhead · « **Reply #14 on:** December 15, 2004, 02:42:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by wombatt
Indeed big brother is watching.
That is total bullcrap.
What he did on his own time is his buisness.

Not if you're a public figure, Dingbatt. You are "on stage" 24-7, and subject to public scrutiny in anything you might do- if anything I'm more incredelous over the football coach who got fired for partying with strippers...at least he's not sentacing people to prison.