Hi Bohdi,
>While I can not remember the book, I remember reading that some of those 51's even placed fuel bags in the gun bays after they modified them by removing all nonessential structure. If you think about it, it is definitely feasible especially considering the existence of the fuel lines headed to the drop tanks.
Definitely!
I seem to remember reading that before WW2, Seversky even entered a fighter (P-35?) featuring a wet wing, but was forced to withdraw his entry again since the wet wing was a military secret at the time.
>Still, I agree, the winds aloft definitely helped, but as you look, you also see an increase every year in top sppeds, and that is more than likely owed to the techincal advances.
... in wind-making ;-)
But of course you're right. Ironically, the slower the aircraft, the greater the benefit from the wind! :-)
Regards,
Henning (HoHun)