Author Topic: Compare of PF and AH P38  (Read 1689 times)

Offline TequilaChaser

  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10173
      • The Damned - founded by Ptero in 1988
Re: Re: Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2005, 03:02:54 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Russian
FYI P38 was released 2 years ago in AEP add-on for IL2 series. So you are comparing AH model that yet to be released to 2 year old IL2 model. :confused:

Why don’t you compare second screenshot?



why compare at all? either you like it or you don't

if one likes that other sim p38 then go fly it,  if you like the terrain graphics then go fly it, this is Aces high so you should talk about Aces high things, especially in the General Discussion area.reagardless if it is positive or negative    ..save that other sim comparison talk for one of the other forums


Natedog  and crew has done an outstanding job on the 38L.............gun smoke, ejecting shells and the pilot does not look like he is falling out of the side of the cockpit

why are the people that talk down about things even here if they think it is  so outdated?  or if they think the FM is off, or the gameplay is bad? why sit around on your computer complaining on the Aces high boards, just go to that other sim where you think it is so much better....................... ..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
still here?  quit ya whining then and get in the game........
"When one considers just what they should say to a new pilot who is logging in Aces High, the mind becomes confused in the complex maze of info it is necessary for the new player to know. All of it is important; most of it vital; and all of it just too much for one brain to absorb in 1-2 lessons" TC

Offline rshubert

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1462
Re: Re: Re: Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2005, 03:13:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by TequilaChaser


why are the people that talk down about things even here if they think it is  so outdated?  or if they think the FM is off, or the gameplay is bad? why sit around on your computer complaining on the Aces high boards, just go to that other sim where you think it is so much better....................... ..


Amen, Brother.  Can I get a witness?

Offline Blooz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3845
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2005, 03:19:34 PM »
Looks very nice but this is all you'll really see.



White 9
JG11 Sonderstaffel

"The 'F' in 'communism' stands for food."

Offline streetstang

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1390
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2005, 03:26:13 PM »
Apples to oranges.

They both look real nice, but it'll always be apples to oranges.

Offline Howitzer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1579
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2005, 03:51:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by streetstang
Apples to oranges.

They both look real nice, but it'll always be apples to oranges.


I got your oranges over here Morph   :D

Offline streetstang

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1390
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #20 on: January 21, 2005, 03:52:37 PM »
Playing hard to get will only excite me more.

Better whatch it!

Offline Sp4de

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
      • http://www.freewebs.com/decommissisoned1/
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #21 on: January 21, 2005, 03:55:50 PM »
delete
I thought the top picture was ah :lol  made a comment about it bahhahah im stupid

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
Re: Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #22 on: January 21, 2005, 04:28:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by TexMurphy




Imho not much of a difference.

The light effect seen on the AH picture is there in PF as well, just didnt get it caught on screenie. Shells are there on both. The biggest difference imho is that the spinners are better on the PF model, could be skin related though.

But this is damn close to PF graphics..

Very good job HTC.

Tex


the AH2 P-38L captures the look of the real p38. can't wait to see it in the game. even the low poly ah1 version captured the look of it now its perfect.

the il2/pf p38 is a misproportioned POS anddoes not capture the look of the real p38. and gibage (the 3d modeller that made the Il2/PF p38 is a self righteous pompous arnoldh0le.)
« Last Edit: January 21, 2005, 04:37:16 PM by Citabria »
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

Offline Estes

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3647
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #23 on: January 21, 2005, 04:32:36 PM »
Maybe its just me, but the AH 38 looks more realistic.

That Il2 one looks jaggedy and Arcadeish. (I know, I know its a game) But AH's looks more real to me anyway.

But then again, I hate Il2..All the pretty graphics in the world wouldn't make me play that game. Controls suck.

Feels really mushy.

Offline TexMurphy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1488
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #24 on: January 21, 2005, 04:53:49 PM »
Reason I posted the compare was that in many cases Il-2 series is seen as state of the art WW2 sim graphics....

Im not really that keen in their graphics though as they do look a bit tooo cartoonish to me...

The comparing was more to show that the new stuff we are getting is very close to what is considerd (by many) state of the art WW2 sim graphics...

Tex.

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #25 on: January 21, 2005, 05:27:12 PM »
What you compared was an IL2 screen shot with no AA and the graphic detail set to low. Its looks like crap but even in that screen shot it compares well with AH2. I certainly wouldn't call you Il2 screen shot an example of 'state of the art'. Il2 P-38 is 3 years old, from the looks of that SS you graphics card is at least as old.

Some of you seem so blinded by fan boi'ism I bet if HT posted a pile of steaming dog crap with wings on it folks would come out claim how fantastic it looks and try to compare it to Il2.

The guy that modeled the P-38 for IL2 is an stunninghunk as Cit says, and he made plenty of errors not just on the P-38 but other planes he modeled.

While AH2 planes do look better then AH1 they certainly aren't 'better then Il2' but they don't need to be. Nobody flies with externals in AH anyway, I know you don't want to post cockpit comparisons.

AH is a great game on its own despite the exaggerations...

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #26 on: January 21, 2005, 05:37:37 PM »
The new shot look good as well....

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #27 on: January 21, 2005, 06:06:51 PM »
Honest the AH looks better.

Il2 just has an excellent lightning system and the colours are more bright.

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #28 on: January 21, 2005, 06:42:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wotan

Some of you seem so blinded by fan boi'ism I bet if HT posted a pile of steaming dog crap with wings on it folks would come out claim how fantastic it looks and try to compare it to Il2.



apparently you are not familiar with what I find to be an acceptable 3d model. if you knew you would surely know I am not one to say its looks good and perfectly accurate when it does not.
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
Compare of PF and AH P38
« Reply #29 on: January 21, 2005, 08:28:51 PM »
Quote
apparently you are not familiar with what I find to be an acceptable 3d model. if you knew you would surely know I am not one to say its looks good and perfectly accurate when it does not.


Sure I am, I have read enough of your critiques but that has nothing to do with my point.

This thread is a comparison of Il2's P-38L and AH2's new P-38L. The originator of this thread posted a poor quality IL2 screen shot and used that to claim that the AH2 P-38L looks better then the old 'state of the art' Il2 P-38.

 While I admitted there are some inaccuracies to the Il2 model they are minor and most lay persons can't tell the difference. There are inaccuracies in the AH models as well. That's a far cry from what this thread is about.

I am not pissing on AH either, its a great game and new planes look really good. I just don't think there's any reason for comparisons and exaggerations. But if you are so inclined to make comparisons at least compare the 2 at their best.