« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10]   Go Down

Author Topic: I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"  (Read 2405 times)

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #135 on: January 21, 2005, 11:16:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
Ahhh, just here to flap your gums.  Then why get so upset when someone flaps back?



an admission.

ah......
Logged
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #136 on: January 21, 2005, 11:17:14 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by patrone
Well, the war on terror is supported by UN, was that a suprise?

And the only one that is not showing any actully facts and repeating himself is you, Martlet. Atleast I have something on my "feet" while making the whine. And don´t you worry, I am not gonna resort into anything "slugish" to get this tread locked, so spare the wind.

Yes, charged with crimes against humanity. Can you give me the slightest hint, why his trail needs to be cencored and all journalists banned from it?

And no: I am not a fan of Saddam Hussain, but his acts should be brought up in the light, for everyone to see and he needs to be given a fair trail. Proof has to be put up, witness speak. You guys owe this to all of his victims families.
After the trail, noone can deny his inorcense or his action, just like no one could deny the horrible acts of the Nazi Goverment, after the Nurnberg trials.

To make a "summerian process" and to take his life, will not bring anything good.


agreed.
Logged
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #137 on: January 22, 2005, 03:14:24 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
The US has broken no treaties, though, in going to war against Iraq.


So the USA only broke a "charter"* they almost wrote and endorsed as they signed it.

Is that really different than breaking a "treaty" ?

What credibility it give to the word of USA  ?

Nota bene , the past Indian treaty should have been a good indication of the value of this word.**

* note I didn't wrote "treaty" to please you :p



** that's the harsh part I'm supposed to add as an americkunn stalker.
Logged

Offline EagleEyes

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1474
      • http://www.myspace.com/bassim
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #138 on: January 22, 2005, 09:32:26 AM »
Yes Saddam and Bin Laden didnt like eachother but both HATED america and would have had no problems using nukes!
Logged
Joedog31

GL IV./JG4 for Red Storm Krupp Steel
***The Flying Circus*** MA
334th FS "The Eagles" - FSO

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #139 on: January 22, 2005, 09:52:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by patrone
Well, the war on terror is supported by UN, was that a suprise?

And the only one that is not showing any actully facts and repeating himself is you, Martlet. Atleast I have something on my "feet" while making the whine. And don´t you worry, I am not gonna resort into anything "slugish" to get this tread locked, so spare the wind.

Yes, charged with crimes against humanity. Can you give me the slightest hint, why his trail needs to be cencored and all journalists banned from it?

And no: I am not a fan of Saddam Hussain, but his acts should be brought up in the light, for everyone to see and he needs to be given a fair trail. Proof has to be put up, witness speak. You guys owe this to all of his victims families.
After the trail, noone can deny his inorcense or his action, just like no one could deny the horrible acts of the Nazi Goverment, after the Nurnberg trials.

To make a "summerian process" and to take his life, will not bring anything good.


How is that the fault of the US?  The Iraqi gov't has charged him and put him on trial.  Take it up with them.  Redirecting your attack from the topic at hand only exemplifies the extent you'll go to while furthering your Ameribash.  At least try to whine about something factual.

Quote
Originally posted by JB88
an admission.

ah......


Hey!  The peanut gallery!

Quote
Originally posted by straffo
So the USA only broke a "charter"* they almost wrote and endorsed as they signed it.

Is that really different than breaking a "treaty" ?

What credibility it give to the word of USA  ?

Nota bene , the past Indian treaty should have been a good indication of the value of this word.**

* note I didn't wrote "treaty" to please you :p



** that's the harsh part I'm supposed to add as an americkunn stalker.


It is different.  It also wasn't broken.  Many UN members participated.

They just decided to carry out Item 11.  There was no UN objection.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2005, 09:58:03 AM by Martlet »
Logged

Offline patrone

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 608
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #140 on: January 22, 2005, 10:14:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
How is that the fault of the US?  The Iraqi gov't has charged him and put him on trial.  Take it up with them.  Redirecting your attack from the topic at hand only exemplifies the extent you'll go to while furthering your Ameribash.  At least try to whine about something factual.


They just decided to carry out Item 11.  There was no UN objection.


Oh, I see, the Iraq was the ones that Captured him? You know that every single word I have uttered in this tread it the absolut truth,, .......Ouch,, that must really hurt, Martlet.

Kisses to you for trying
Rumsfeild to scared to go to Germany
« Last Edit: January 22, 2005, 10:19:35 AM by patrone »
Logged

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #141 on: January 22, 2005, 10:33:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by patrone
Oh, I see, the Iraq was the ones that Captured him? You know that every single word I have uttered in this tread it the absolut truth,, .......Ouch,, that must really hurt, Martlet.

Kisses to you for trying
Rumsfeild to scared to go to Germany


Actually, it's all bunk.

Who captures him has absolutely nothing to do with who's jurisdiction he is tried under.  zip.  zero.  nada.   Criminals are caught by authorities, or even bounty hunters, all the time, and turned over.

Such is the case with Saddam.

Nice of you to be concerned with him, though.  That's what I don't get about Amerihaters.  They'd rather see the absolute worst scenario if it makes the US look bad.

You'd like nothing more than to see Saddam go free or the US fail in Iraq just so you can come to a BBS and go "naa naaa".
Logged

Offline Raider179

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #142 on: January 22, 2005, 10:57:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by EagleEyes
Yes Saddam and Bin Laden didnt like eachother but both HATED america and would have had no problems using nukes!


oh really? you have some proof that Saddam wanted to nuke us? he had vx which he could have used and he didnt. He had sarin which he could have used and didnt. He had anthrax which he could have used and didnt.

As for Bin Laden he recently(2003) got permission (religous fatwa) that said it was ok for him to strike us with nukes.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/11/12/60minutes/main655407.shtml
Logged

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #143 on: January 22, 2005, 11:07:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
It is different.  It also wasn't broken.  Many UN members participated.

They just decided to carry out Item 11.  There was no UN objection.


With 2 permament council members it would have been very surprising to see any objection ... it would have been as efficient as peeing in Violin*



Sorry I don't know the correct translation of "Pisser dans un violon" :D
Logged

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #144 on: January 22, 2005, 11:47:23 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
With 2 permament council members it would have been very surprising to see any objection ... it would have been as efficient as peeing in Violin*



Sorry I don't know the correct translation of "Pisser dans un violon" :D


Change the rules, then.

We played by them.  Wah.
Logged

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #145 on: January 22, 2005, 01:18:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn



"16 Dec 1998 The Special Commission withdraws its staff from Iraq."


http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm



God I don't know why you enjoy proving to this board how ignorant you are, but way to go on a job well done.


 
Quote
31 Oct 1998 Iraq announces that it will cease all forms of interaction with UNSCOM and its Chairman and to halt all UNSCOM’s activities inside Iraq, including monitoring. The Security Council, in a statement to the press, unanimously condemn Iraq’s decision to cease all cooperation with UNSCOM


You are so clever Thrawn....... you tried to make it sound like UN had a choice.

That's a great sight by the way. It shows how Iraq never cooperated fully with inspectors. Every other paragraph has the words "The UN demands Iraq cooperate with..."

That's a great page to read so people can understand that Saddam could never be trusted.
Logged

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #146 on: January 22, 2005, 01:32:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
You are so clever Thrawn....... you tried to make it sound like UN had a choice.


How did I make it "sound" like anything I posted a direct quote from the inpectors own documation.  The UN did have a choice, stay or go.  They didn't see any point in staying so they choose to leave.  Saddam didn't force them to leave or "kick them out" as you posted as a so-called fact.


Quote
That's a great sight by the way. It shows how Iraq never cooperated fully with inspectors. Every other paragraph has the words "The UN demands Iraq cooperate with..."



Indeed, but that has nothing to do with you posting disinformation as fact.
Logged

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #147 on: January 22, 2005, 01:40:51 PM »
LOL, okay, you got me on a technicality. Kinda like "depends on what "is" is

The fact is that Saddam stopped UN inspections in Iraq.

Quote
and to halt all UNSCOM’s activities inside Iraq, including monitoring.


I guess they didn't have to leave afterall. They could have stayed and opend a hotdog stand or something.

What a pathetic argument you have made, Thrawn. You are the one who is shown to be ignorant on the matter.
Logged

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies"
« Reply #148 on: January 22, 2005, 01:48:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
What a pathetic argument you have made, Thrawn. You are the one who is shown to be ignorant on the matter.



...says the man who makes claims about UNSCOM inspections and had never even read their documentaion.  If my arguement is so pathetic, yet you concede the point, than what type of arguement was yours?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10]   Go Up
« previous next »