Author Topic: MP3 Players  (Read 662 times)

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
MP3 Players
« on: January 24, 2005, 09:57:20 PM »
I'm using Winamp... but I am becoming convinced that it is so totally messing up the sound.

I'm not sure how the software works for playing these, but are all players the same as far as sound quality goes, or do they each have some form of built in EQ?

If they're different, what do you recommend? Forget all the little features or if the interface looks like something out of freakin' Blade Runner - how's the sound when EQ is flatlined is all I care about.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2005, 10:05:45 PM by Nash »

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
MP3 Players
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2005, 10:19:09 PM »
I USED to use Winamp exclusively.  I now use Windows Media Player 10.  Winamp is a resource hog to the 10th degree.   I rip CD's on my hard drive to 192Khz.   You rip at 128Khz?   I rarely use EQ's.   They just "color" the sound even worse.

Karaya
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
MP3 Players
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2005, 10:23:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
You rip at 128Khz? Karaya


Well no, I'm playing CD's of the store-bought variety. Maybe I'm making a mistake playing them through Winamp? I'm clueless here.

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
MP3 Players
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2005, 10:47:55 PM »
I run DFX with Winamp, allows much better sound.  Winamp kinda sad without it.

dago
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
MP3 Players
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2005, 10:51:58 PM »
Nash, I just did a little experiment.

Opened a Sheryl crow CD in Windows Media player.....disabled the EQ and listened to a track that I know how it's supposed to sound.

The kick and bass was boomy, whole thing really compressed sounding

I then opened it with RealPlayer. 10 times better. Just the software was the difference. Maybe try a few and see what sounds best.

But I hate the way CD's lose their dynamics running through a computer anyway.......can't stand it.

I play through a CD player, direct into a little Mackie board and into some powered speakers. You can really tell how much the computer screws up the sound when you side by side them.

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
MP3 Players
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2005, 10:55:39 PM »
i use either i-tunes, or musicmatch.

they both sound pretty decent to me...but then i am not overly gifted in the dumbo department.
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline SunKing

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3726
MP3 Players
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2005, 11:06:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dago
I run DFX with Winamp, allows much better sound.  Winamp kinda sad without it.

dago


What is DFX? got a link?

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
MP3 Players
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2005, 11:15:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SunKing
What is DFX?


I just went and installed DFX. It's a plug-in for Winamp. Kinda like a slightly adjustable set of EQ presets.

Things like "ambience", "dynamic boost", "hyper bass". Then basically pull sliders to determine how much of each you want applied.

So it's not really what I'm gettin' at. Almost the complete opposite in fact. :)

Is there a difference in sound quality - purely unmolested sound quality - between the different players?

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
MP3 Players
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2005, 11:20:11 PM »
Nuke - interesting.

I'll give that a try. But it's been my personal observation that RealPlayer behaves in ways that I've come to associate with the much ballyhoo'd internet computer viruses.

Offline SOB

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10138
MP3 Players
« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2005, 12:06:17 AM »
Yeah, just say no to RealAnything.  It's just not worth it.
Three Times One Minus One.  Dayum!

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
MP3 Players
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2005, 12:12:20 AM »
SOB, I've never had a problemn with it. I run Zone Alarm and realplayer doesn't try to do anything funny that I've ever seen.

Offline SOB

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10138
MP3 Players
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2005, 12:19:02 AM »
If they've removed the spyware crap from their product, then good for them.  I still won't be using anything produced by their company.
Three Times One Minus One.  Dayum!

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
MP3 Players
« Reply #12 on: January 25, 2005, 12:23:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
I USED to use Winamp exclusively.  I now use Windows Media Player 10.  Winamp is a resource hog to the 10th degree.


Which is why I'm still using WinAmp 2.8
sand

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
MP3 Players
« Reply #13 on: January 25, 2005, 12:32:53 AM »
Who cares about hogged resources?

Which one sounds the best?

Or is the actual process by which an MP3/CD is translated into audible sounds the same, no matter what yer running them through?

Are the only choices really between WinAmp, Windows and RealPlayer?

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
MP3 Players
« Reply #14 on: January 25, 2005, 12:39:56 AM »
Nash, they do not all sound the same.

I couldn't tell you which is best, but they do not all sound the same.