Author Topic: Time To Start Killing the Old People (Read 1028 times)

Dune · « **on:** January 25, 2005, 10:14:44 PM »

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6866567/

Quote

By Tom Curry
National affairs writer
MSNBC
Updated: 4:55 p.m. ET Jan. 25, 2005WASHINGTON - The growth in mandatory federal spending, driven by the inexorable aging of the American population, means that well over half of all federal spending will go to entitlement programs for the elderly by 2015, Congressional Budget Office director Douglas Holtz-Eakin said Tuesday as he released a report giving his agency’s forecast for the next 10 years

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #1 on:** January 25, 2005, 10:17:11 PM »

See, people have obtained a new healthy lifestyle full of vitamins. They live to be over 100 only surviving because of drugs and the like. They can not live without these items. Nor are they fully functional.

But the way I see it, if you don't kick out at 70, you aren't trying hard enough.

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #2 on:** January 25, 2005, 10:21:42 PM »

Sandman · « **Reply #3 on:** January 25, 2005, 10:36:24 PM »

Before we start lining up for the dirt nap, can we define "old people"?

Masherbrum · « **Reply #4 on:** January 25, 2005, 11:10:22 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
Before we start lining up for the dirt nap, can we define "old people"?

You are at the front of the line mister

Karaya

SOB · « **Reply #5 on:** January 25, 2005, 11:23:43 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
Before we start lining up for the dirt nap, can we define "old people"?

If you have to ask, please report to the Euthanas...err, Information Officer.

Delirium · « **Reply #6 on:** January 26, 2005, 07:19:59 AM »

In some cases, I agree... I've seen too many 70, 80, 90, and even one 100 year old receive permanent feeding tubes inserted to extend their lives.

lazs2 · « **Reply #7 on:** January 26, 2005, 08:19:19 AM »

some of us old people are armed.

lazs

lada · « **Reply #8 on:** January 26, 2005, 08:23:49 AM »

what about cut down social security and make it mandatory for children to take care of their own parents.

Do you mind to support your parents ?
Would you rather give money to your goverment or to your parents ?
Do you have enough money to take care of them, if you will have smaller taxes ?

Shamus · « **Reply #9 on:** January 26, 2005, 08:33:09 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
Before we start lining up for the dirt nap, can we define "old people"?

Hajo

Masherbrum · « **Reply #10 on:** January 26, 2005, 08:48:53 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Shamus
Hajo

LMFAO!!

Karaya

lazs2 · « **Reply #11 on:** January 26, 2005, 08:51:32 AM »

lada... most of the people in the states of todays generations do not know who one or both of their parents are. Some of us do not belong to the social security system.

lazs

Octavius · « **Reply #12 on:** January 26, 2005, 08:53:14 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin

I'd hit the bottom right.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #13 on:** January 26, 2005, 09:01:21 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
lada... most of the people in the states of todays generations do not know who one or both of their parents are. Some of us do not belong to the social security system.

lazs

You may be right. Only the two kids I have here at home know Im their father.
The other ones think the guy married to their mom is.

thats ok. Those guys also think they are their father too.

lada · « **Reply #14 on:** January 26, 2005, 09:04:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
lada... most of the people in the states of todays generations do not know who one or both of their parents are. Some of us do not belong to the social security system.

lazs

well they dont have fathers/mothers name in birth ID (im sure you call that paper by diferent name

)?

its hard to belive since most of people over there seems to be pretty pious.

I dont thik that majority of people belongs to group whitch you mentioned.

However my question were more less for local folk. Sort of rude personal question