Interesting article from The Christian Science Monitor via AOL on converting terrorists from bad guys to good guys via debate:
Click here to read this story online:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0204/p01s04-wome.htmlHeadline:  Koranic duels ease terror
Byline:  James Brandon Contributor to The Christian Science Monitor
Date: 02/04/2005
(SANAA, YEMEN)  When Judge Hamoud al-Hitar announced that he and four other Islamic 
scholars would challenge Yemen's Al Qaeda prisoners to a theological 
contest, Western antiterrorism experts warned that this high-stakes 
gamble would end in disaster.
Nervous as he faced five captured, yet defiant, Al Qaeda members in a 
Sanaa prison, Judge Hitar was inclined to agree. But banishing his 
doubts, the youthful cleric threw down the gauntlet, in the hope of 
bringing peace to his troubled homeland.
"If you can convince us that your ideas are justified by the Koran, 
then we will join you in your struggle," Hitar told the militants. "But 
if we succeed in convincing you of our ideas, then you must agree to 
renounce violence."
The prisoners eagerly agreed.
Now, two years later, not only have those prisoners been released, but 
a relative peace reigns in Yemen. And the same Western experts who 
doubted this experiment are courting Hitar, eager to hear how his 
"theological dialogues" with captured Islamic militants have helped 
pacify this wild and mountainous country, previously seen by the US as 
a failed state, like Iraq and Afghanistan.
"Since December 2002, when the first round of the dialogues ended, 
there have been no terrorist attacks here, even though many people 
thought that Yemen would become terror's capital," says Hitar, eyes 
glinting shrewdly from beneath his emerald-green turban. "Three hundred 
and sixty-four young men have been released after going through the 
dialogues and none of these have left Yemen to fight anywhere else."
"Yemen's strategy has been unconventional certainly, but it has 
achieved results that we could never have hoped for," says one European 
diplomat, who did not want to be named. "Yemen has gone from being a 
potential enemy to becoming an indispensable ally in the war on terror."
To be sure, the prisoner-release program is not solely responsible for 
the absence of attacks in Yemen. The government has undertaken a range 
of measures to combat terrorism from closing down extreme madrassahs, 
the Islamic schools sometimes accused of breeding hate, to deporting 
foreign militants.
Eager to spread the news of his success, Hitar welcomes foreigners into 
his home, fussing over them and pouring endless cups of tea. But beyond 
the otherwise nondescript house, a sense of menace lurks. Two military 
jeeps are parked outside, and soldiers peer through the gathering dark 
at passing cars. The evening wind sweeps through the unpaved streets, 
lifting clouds of dust and whipping up men's jackets to expose belts 
hung with daggers, pistols, and mobile telephones.
Seated amid stacks of Korans and religious texts, Hitar explains that 
his system is simple. He invites militants to use the Koran to justify 
attacks on innocent civilians and when they cannot, he shows them 
numerous passages commanding Muslims not to attack civilians, to 
respect other religions, and fight only in self-defense.
For example, he quotes: "Whoever kills a soul, unless for a soul, or 
for corruption done in the land - it is as if he had slain all mankind 
entirely. And, whoever saves one, it is as if he had saved mankind 
entirely." He uses the passage to bolster his argument against bombing 
Western targets in Yemen - attacks he says defy the Koran. And, he 
says, the Koran says under no circumstances should women and children 
be killed.
If, after weeks of debate, the prisoners renounce violence they are 
released and offered vocational training courses and help to find jobs.
Hitar's belief that hardened militants trained by Osama bin Laden in 
Afghanistan could change their stripes was initially dismissed by US 
diplomats in Sanaa as dangerously naive, but the methods of the 
scholarly cleric have little in common with the other methods of 
fighting extremism. Instead of lecturing or threatening the 
battle-hardened militants, he listens to them.
"An important part of the dialogue is mutual respect," says Hitar. 
"Along with acknowledging freedom of expression, intellect and opinion, 
you must listen and show interest in what the other party is saying."
Only after winning the militants' trust does Hitar gradually begin to 
correct their beliefs. He says that most militants are ordinary people 
who have been led astray. Just as they were taught Al Qaeda's 
doctrines, he says, so too can they be taught more- moderate ideas. "If 
you study terrorism in the world, you will see that it has an 
intellectual theory behind it," says Hitar. "And any kind of 
intellectual idea can be defeated by intellect."
The program's success surprised even Hitar. For years Yemen was 
synonymous with violent Islamic extremism. The ancestral homeland of 
Mr. bin Laden, it provided two-thirds of recruits for his Afghan camps, 
and was notorious for kidnappings of foreigners and the bombing of the 
American warship USS Cole in 2000 that killed 17 sailors. Resisting US 
pressure, Yemen declined to meet violence with violence.
"It's only logical to tackle these people through their brains and 
heart," says Faris Sanabani, a former adviser to President Abdullah 
Saleh and editor-in-chief of the Yemen Observer, a weekly 
English-language newspaper. "If you beat these people up they become 
more stubborn. If you hit them, they will enjoy the pain and find 
something good in it - it is a part of their ideology. Instead, what we 
must do is erase what they have been taught and explain to them that 
terrorism will only harm Yemenis' jobs and prospects. Once they 
understand this they become fighters for freedom and democracy, and 
fighters for the true Islam," he says.
Some freed militants were so transformed that they led the army to 
hidden weapons caches and offered the Yemeni security services advice 
on tackling Islamic militancy. A spectacular success came in 2002 when 
Abu Ali al Harithi, Al Qaeda's top commander in Yemen, was assassinated 
by a US air-strike following a tip-off from one of Hitar's reformed 
militants.
Yet despite the apparent success in Yemen, some US diplomats have 
criticized it for apparently letting Islamic militants off the hook 
with little guarantee that they won't revert to their old ways once 
released from prison.
Yemen, however, argues that holding and punishing all militants would 
create only further discontent, pointing out that the actual 
perpetrators of attacks have all been prosecuted, with the bombers of 
the USS Cole and the French oil tanker, the SS Limburg. All received 
death sentences.
"Yemeni goals are long-term political aims whereas the American agenda 
focuses on short-term prosecution of military or law enforcement 
objectives," wrote Charles Schmitz, a specialist in Yemeni affairs, in 
2004 report for the Jamestown Foundation, an influential US think tank.
"These goals are not necessarily contradictory, with each government 
recognizing that compromises and accommodations must be made, but their 
ambiguities create tense moments."
Some members of the Yemeni government also hanker for a more 
iron-fisted approach, and Yemen remains on high alert for further 
attacks. Fighter planes regularly swoop low over the ancient mud-brick 
city of Sanaa to send a clear message to any would-be militants.
An additional cause of friction with the US is that while Yemen 
successfully discourages attacks within its borders on the grounds that 
tourism and trade will suffer, it has done little to tackle 
anti-Western sentiment or the corruption, poverty, and lack of 
opportunity that fuels Islamic militancy.
"Yemen still faces serious challenges, but despite the odd hiccup, we 
sometimes have to admit that Yemenis know Yemen best," says the 
European diplomat. "And if their system works, who are we to complain?"
As the relative success of Yemen's unusual approach becomes apparent, 
Hitar has been invited to speak to antiterrorism specialists at 
London's New Scotland Yard, as well as to French and German police, 
hoping to defuse growing militancy among Muslim immigrants.
US diplomats have also approached the cleric to see if his methods can 
be applied in Iraq, says Hitar.
"Before the dialogues began, there was only one way to fight terrorism, 
and that was through force," he says. "Now there is another way: 
dialogue."
(c) Copyright 2005 The Christian Science Monitor.  All rights reserved.