Author Topic: LW 13mm MG-131s  (Read 1069 times)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
LW 13mm MG-131s
« on: February 17, 2005, 10:36:09 PM »
Stupid question, probably, but were these guns firing solid rounds (like 50cal?) or small explosive rounds (like MG-151 and small caliber cannon?)?

Offline Glasses

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1811
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2005, 10:52:05 PM »
I call the powers of knowledge from the altar of munition knowledge TONY WILLIAMS COME HITHER  and Enlighten us mere mortals  :D

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2005, 11:12:00 PM »
They had explosive rounds.

Offline Tony Williams

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
      • http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2005, 11:33:58 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Glasses
I call the powers of knowledge from the altar of munition knowledge TONY WILLIAMS COME HITHER  and Enlighten us mere mortals  :D


Did somebody rub my lamp? :cool:

There were various types of ammo fired by the MG 131, including HE, HEI, AP and incendiary, with or without tracers.

I have seen belting ratios of 2 x HEI-T plus 1 x AP-T, or 1 x AP-T, 1 x HEI and 1 x HE-T.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and discussion
forum

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2005, 01:00:34 PM »
So... Why in AH do we have crappy 13mm guns that only act like 50cals? They should be much more powerful!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2005, 01:21:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
So... Why in AH do we have crappy 13mm guns that only act like 50cals? They should be much more powerful!

AH seems to favor muzzle velocity and the 13mm MG131 had a crappy muzzle velocity.

Also keep in mind that the HE or HEI content of rounds that small will be pretty low.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline moose

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2702
      • http://www.ccrhl.com
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2005, 01:23:11 PM »
what if we were able to select different types of ammunition ? incindary would be fun to use :D
<----ASSASSINS---->

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2005, 01:24:18 PM »
Hi Krusty,

>So... Why in AH do we have crappy 13mm guns that only act like 50cals? They should be much more powerful!

Well, compare the following rounds:


Round       Type    Mass g  v0 m/s  Chem% KE kJ    ChemE kJ total E kJ
12,7x99     API     112     890     2     17,0     4,8      21,8
12,7x99     AP*     112     890     0     17,0     0,0      17,0
13x64B      AP       76     710     0      9,7     0,0       9,7
13x64B      HE       72     750     3,5    9,6     6,6      16,2

* Figures from API with 0 chemical energy for comparison purposes


The 12.7 mm M2 fires a 50% heavier shell at a 20% higher velocity, giving about 2 times the kinetic energy.

Use the most powerful round for the MG131 and the 12.7 mm M2 alike, and the firepower of the M2 is 135% per round. Figure in the higher rate of fire of the MG131, the M2's firepower per barrel is just 117%.

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)

Offline MANDO

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 549
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2005, 02:39:35 PM »
HoHun,

mixing incendiary chem with he chem with no chem at all, to find out a total E and derive from there the potential damage is a big mistake.

Powerful AP or API will do a deep or deeper hole with or without fire chance. He damage is different at all. Is like comparing medieval swords with medieval mazes, you just cant use the weight and speed of the blow to calculate an ammount of damage for mazes and swords.

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2005, 03:08:23 PM »
Hi Mando,

>mixing incendiary chem with he chem with no chem at all, to find out a total E and derive from there the potential damage is a big mistake.

Not at all :-) It's a slight oversimplification that averages out over a large number of hits on a complex target.

>Is like comparing medieval swords with medieval mazes, you just cant use the weight and speed of the blow to calculate an ammount of damage for mazes and swords.

Terminal ballistics is hell :-)

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)

Offline Schaden

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 494
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2005, 11:30:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Glasses
I call the powers of knowledge from the altar of munition knowledge TONY WILLIAMS COME HITHER  and Enlighten us mere mortals  :D


Sort of like the Bat Signal?

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #11 on: February 21, 2005, 02:49:29 PM »
I always thought the .50 contained explosives?

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #12 on: February 21, 2005, 03:03:59 PM »
Nope just incenderary.

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #13 on: February 21, 2005, 04:22:08 PM »
Incendary means that the thing will damage something due to impact?

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
LW 13mm MG-131s
« Reply #14 on: February 21, 2005, 05:08:47 PM »
Incendiary = Fire.  It's meant to cause a fire to whatever it hits.


If you take a regular .50 BMG and hit a grass hut, it's gonna make a clean hole.

You take an Incendiary .50 BMG and hit a grass hut, it should light that sucka up!  (Should being the keyword there).
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"