Author Topic: last word  (Read 121018 times)

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
last word
« Reply #1455 on: March 25, 2007, 02:32:01 AM »
There....

Mac

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
last word
« Reply #1456 on: March 25, 2007, 02:33:53 AM »
there.
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
last word
« Reply #1457 on: March 25, 2007, 02:38:18 AM »
Whoa hold the phone.....


If Pat Tillmans death under friendly fire draws judicial attention and monetary compensation.....do others have the same rights?

I mean Hell I've seen alotta chit....right or frikken wrong....can I claim chit?

WTF?

Mac


Opps... almost forgot the rules.....



word
« Last Edit: March 25, 2007, 02:40:28 AM by AWMac »

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
last word
« Reply #1458 on: March 25, 2007, 02:40:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AWMac
I object Top Cat was never noted and there is NO mention of Tom.....

Apparently RPM couldn't find his puss in a Google in the ground!  

Based upon this....Those on the "D" Fence rest...

Bill the Cat requests a sidebar....

:p

Mac
I'm sorry, but TopCat was ex post facto. According to Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution, "no State shall pass any ex post facto Law.''

The Supreme Court first held that the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws applied only to criminal laws in the landmark opinion of Calder v. Bull (1798).

While the Supreme Court has not issued a blanket prohibition against civil ex post facto laws, it has recognized that retroactive laws do present real problems of fairness. General Motors Corp. v. Evert Romein (1992)

Also noteworthy are Magilla Gorilla v. Peebles Pet Shop, Inc. (1962) and Penelope Pitstop v. Mutley (1974).

Your objection is overuled. <-word
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
last word
« Reply #1459 on: March 25, 2007, 02:43:37 AM »
i don't want a pickle
just wanna ride my motorcycle.
and i don't wanna die
just wanna ride on my motorcyyyyy...cle.
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

VWE

  • Guest
last word
« Reply #1460 on: March 25, 2007, 02:45:13 AM »
Soon the alcohol will take effect and you'll all fall asleep...

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
last word
« Reply #1461 on: March 25, 2007, 02:48:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by rpm
I'm sorry, but TopCat was ex post facto. According to Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution, "no State shall pass any ex post facto Law.''

The Supreme Court first held that the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws applied only to criminal laws in the landmark opinion of Calder v. Bull (1798).

While the Supreme Court has not issued a blanket prohibition against civil ex post facto laws, it has recognized that retroactive laws do present real problems of fairness. General Motors Corp. v. Evert Romein (1992)

Also noteworthy are Magilla Gorilla v. Peebles Pet Shop, Inc. (1962) and Penelope Pitstop v. Mutley (1974).

Your objection is overuled. <-word


Noooo.... So Wrong!!!

I will show you AND others where you have mistated this...... Magilla Gorilla v. Peebles Pet Shop was overruled by Dino v. Flintstones, et al in {1968). Tom v. Jerry (1974).

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
last word
« Reply #1462 on: March 25, 2007, 02:52:32 AM »
The Snaggle Puss case is still open even after his death in 1967...many are claiming to be the Father of "Bill the Cat".

DNA swabs... takes time....

Soooo sad.....

Mac






word

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
last word
« Reply #1463 on: March 25, 2007, 02:55:36 AM »
<----drops briefcase to see if MAC turns his head by reflex and gets busted for making fraudulent court claims.
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
last word
« Reply #1464 on: March 25, 2007, 02:58:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AWMac
Noooo.... So Wrong!!!

I will show you AND others where you have mistated this...... Magilla Gorilla v. Peebles Pet Shop was overruled by Dino v. Flintstones, et al in {1968). Tom v. Jerry (1974).
Dino v. Flintstones was later stuck down by Astro v. George Jetson, et al (2091) and that decision confirmed by Blip v. Space Ghost (3619).
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
last word
« Reply #1465 on: March 25, 2007, 03:00:10 AM »
<----stenographing as quickly as my wooden arm will let me.
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
last word
« Reply #1466 on: March 25, 2007, 03:00:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by JB88
<----drops briefcase to see if MAC turns his head by reflex and gets busted for making fraudulent court claims.


You want the truth?  You want the TRUTH???

:D

A Few Good Men was on tonight...Jack is Cool...Cruise is still Ghey.

Tom you CAN'T handle the TRUTH!!!

:D

Mac


word

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
last word
« Reply #1467 on: March 25, 2007, 03:01:27 AM »
skuzzy your honor, i submit to you that this man is clearly an unstable witness and should be withdrawn from further testimony!
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
last word
« Reply #1468 on: March 25, 2007, 03:04:28 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by rpm
Dino v. Flintstones was later stuck down by Astro v. George Jetson, et al (2091) and that decision confirmed by Blip v. Space Ghost (3619).


I see how easy you dodge the Tom v. Jerry and to blind side you...

Mighty Mouse v. Heckel & Jeckel (1963)...

YES!!!

Mac



word

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
last word
« Reply #1469 on: March 25, 2007, 03:05:21 AM »
I'll take the case!!!

I'm sitting here watching How The West Was Won. DAMN, Debby Reynolds was hot back in the day!
« Last Edit: March 25, 2007, 03:08:14 AM by rpm »
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.