Author Topic: can we have....  (Read 882 times)

Offline tikky

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
can we have....
« on: February 22, 2005, 06:58:12 PM »
... da B-29? :D

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
can we have....
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2005, 08:12:18 PM »
Screw the B-29........ We have enough American planes already. We need more Axis planes before anymore allied planes imo.
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline 6GunUSMC

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 424
      • http://www.fasteasynet.com
can we have....
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2005, 02:48:41 AM »
The greatest bomber of the era should be in the game.  Please no bonehead add-ons about a perked atom bomb... I think the B-29 has been overlooked too long.  Thumbs up to Pacific Fighters for including it even though at the moment it is only AI.

Offline Fruda

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1267
can we have....
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2005, 02:58:20 AM »
We don't need more Axis planes than Allied planes. The Soviet planeset is full of holes. We need a lot more Soviet planes.

However, there's always the Italian planeset...

Offline Shane

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7945
can we have....
« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2005, 04:18:49 AM »
sure, but only if it's availabe 40 sectors  off map or requires 5 hrs to reach the nearest friendly area.

i mean wtf you want a b-29 for? it was a pure deep strategic bomber while AH is truly a tactical game.

gawd.
Surrounded by suck and underwhelmed with mediocrity.
I'm always right, it just takes some poepl longer to come to that realization than others.
I'm not perfect, but I am closer to it than you are.
"...vox populi, vox dei..."  ~Alcuin ca. 798
Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

Offline JB42

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 558
can we have....
« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2005, 04:20:03 AM »
I would hardly call the B-29 WWII "era". More like Post WWII era, even though it was used late in the war. That honor would probably go the B24.
" The only thing upping from the CV are lifejackets." - JB15

" Does this Pony make my butt look fat?" - JB11

" I'd rather shoot down 1 Spit in a 109 than 10 109s in a Spit." - JB42

Offline Fongman

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 146
can we have....
« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2005, 05:21:55 AM »
I need B25,I-16,P86,Ju52

Offline DaYooper

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 105
can we have....
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2005, 09:06:17 AM »
I'd pay perk points to take B-25's off of cv's.

How about you?

What do you think is a fair # to pay?

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
can we have....
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2005, 09:23:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by JB42
I would hardly call the B-29 WWII "era". More like Post WWII era, even though it was used late in the war. That honor would probably go the B24.


     Then I guess all your Ta-152s and Dorkas are post war era
too?  sheesh.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline OIO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
can we have....
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2005, 09:23:35 AM »
Fiat CR42 please.

I want my biplane :D

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
can we have....
« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2005, 10:39:12 AM »
Quote
Then I guess all your Ta-152s and Dorkas are post war era


Exactly

not to metion the low in numbers build osty (about 40 of them  made)

A lot of people forget it won't perform so super when fully loaded.

Offline 6GunUSMC

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 424
      • http://www.fasteasynet.com
can we have....
« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2005, 12:03:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by JB42
I would hardly call the B-29 WWII "era". More like Post WWII era, even though it was used late in the war. That honor would probably go the B24.


Hi 42!

Actually The B-29 first flew Sept. 21, 1942 and first flew in combat June 5, 1944, 15 months before the end of the war.

Data Direct from Boeings website:

First flight:  Sept. 21, 1942
Model number:  345
Classification:  Bomber
Span:  141 feet 3 inches
Length:  99 feet
Gross weight:  105,000 pounds (140,000 pounds postwar)
Top speed:  365 mph
Cruising speed:  220 mph
Range:  5,830 miles
Ceiling:  31,850 feet (4,000 ft lower than B-17!)
Power:  Four 2,200-horsepower Wright Double Cyclone engines
Accommodation: 10 crew
Armament: 12 .50-caliber machine guns, 1 20 mm cannon, 20,000-pound bomb load

Nearly 3,900 were built and delivered during the war.

Offline JB42

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 558
can we have....
« Reply #12 on: February 23, 2005, 12:23:42 PM »
What i was trying to get at is a plane that served the last 15 months of a 72 month (and one day) war would hardly make it teh bomber of that time-span. If anything, I would argue that the B-29 started a new era on it's own.

The era of I'm to high for you to shoot me down :p

As for "my Ta-152s and Dorkas", i wouldn't consider them post-war, they weren't widely used like the B-29 after 1945 sheesh

In the end, the fact remains, most people want the B-29 so they can afk for an hour and bomb HQs with impunity. There are far more vital planes that still need to be added. Not that I care much, but hell, we don't even have a French plane. They were in that war weren't they?

how about:

PZL P-24
Fokker D.XXI
Arsenal VG-33
Dewoitine D.520
Gladiators and/or Swordfish
Bf410
Fiat G.55
Reggiane Re.2005
VL Myrsky
IAR 80
Lavochkin LaGG-3
Mig-3
" The only thing upping from the CV are lifejackets." - JB15

" Does this Pony make my butt look fat?" - JB11

" I'd rather shoot down 1 Spit in a 109 than 10 109s in a Spit." - JB42

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
can we have....
« Reply #13 on: February 23, 2005, 12:28:01 PM »
don't make me get the pic out!
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
can we have....
« Reply #14 on: February 23, 2005, 01:13:58 PM »
The arado was more of the new era bomber as the B-29 was.

Its a wo2 bomber nothin else.

offcourse the ta 152 and dorkys wheren't widely used after the war :rolleyes:

It was the equipment of the losers .

:D