Author Topic: The Bush (Read 778 times)

TweetyBird · « **on:** February 27, 2005, 09:34:32 PM »

What is this guy's relevance?

This is an early photo of him searching for weapons of mass destruction....

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #1 on:** February 27, 2005, 09:37:46 PM »

Assuming that is a picture of GW, I guess just because someone follows you around with the codes for launching nuclear armageddon on your order, you shouldn't necesarily be considered relevant.

GreenEgg · « **Reply #2 on:** February 27, 2005, 09:38:06 PM »

Looks like Will Farrell searching for a lost Chris Katan.

TweetyBird · « **Reply #3 on:** February 27, 2005, 09:40:18 PM »

Oh, so thats where the codes are...

DiabloTX · « **Reply #4 on:** February 27, 2005, 09:42:39 PM »

Yawn.

TweetyBird · « **Reply #5 on:** February 27, 2005, 09:44:36 PM »

Yea, I know its boring, but to illustrate the ridiculousness of another thread started in the same manner. Juvenile and antagonistic. I just wanna see if this one gets locked.

Dago · « **Reply #6 on:** February 27, 2005, 09:55:55 PM »

My God! He has learned the secret Democratic hand signal for "I found our next Presidential candidate".

SOB · « **Reply #7 on:** February 27, 2005, 10:13:39 PM »

And if this thread gets locked it will prove...what, exactly?

TweetyBird · « **Reply #8 on:** February 27, 2005, 10:14:53 PM »

A wasp lake.

Mini D · « **Reply #9 on:** February 27, 2005, 11:06:45 PM »

So... just to make sure I got this right:

The solution to idiocy is to be a bigger idiot.

One would think that a message to skuzzy might be the way to go on this with an explanation as to why you're sending it. You, however, have chosen a different path. The great irony of the situation is that you're posting right out of nuke's "guide for the complete idiot poster."

Maybe nash could chime in and highlight the shear genius of your post. That would make the whole thing complete.

TweetyBird · « **Reply #10 on:** February 27, 2005, 11:13:44 PM »

I'm not going to write Skuzzy or anyone, because I don't believe in censoring anything but outright profanity. My only point is the inconsistancy. Unless its vulgar, or unlawful (piracy) I don't think anything should be removed. Not even posts pointing out a double standard. Ideas don't hurt anything.

Sandman · « **Reply #11 on:** February 27, 2005, 11:33:58 PM »

Saurdaukar · « **Reply #12 on:** February 27, 2005, 11:35:43 PM »

Pfft... I can do that with two fingers.

Mini D · « **Reply #13 on:** February 27, 2005, 11:42:04 PM »

Bull**** tweety. You don't like that someone can get away with something and someone else can't. You started this in some sort of noble attempt to show that?

Nah. it's idiocy, not genius.

You don't like what nuke posts then tell him. You don't like how skuzzy moderates then send him an e-mail and tell him. This kind of thread is not a cure for anything other than one-upsmanship.

Outside of that: if you think someone's an idiot, how about not trying to outdo him?

TweetyBird · « **Reply #14 on:** February 27, 2005, 11:52:31 PM »

Er yea - did you miss the line about "double standard"?

You are EXACTLY right - I HATE double standards. I also hate censorship unless absolutely neccessary. Why do you think I'm BS'ing?

I did tell Nuke I didn't like what he was doing and I do think I aptly illustrated he was pretty ignorant of the religion he was ragging on.

Edit: I do get your point though. Maybe this thread is a little overboard - I dunno. Really it was to illustrate the absurdity of the other one.

"Idiocy" unlikely - overbearing maybe