Author Topic: Kids will be Kids  (Read 1775 times)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Kids will be Kids
« on: March 01, 2005, 09:48:46 PM »
Finally the Supreme Conservative Court gives a ruling that is beyond question.... correct. WTG.

Here are excerpts from the Supreme Court opinion outlawing the death penalty for offenders under 18 when their crimes were committed:

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2005, 09:51:34 PM »
Ahem... Does O'Connor actually believe that the death penalty is a deterrant?
sand

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2005, 09:51:50 PM »
I think anyone 14 or older who murders another should be put to death.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2005, 09:52:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
I think anyone over 14 who murders another should be put to death.


Hmmm... define murder.
sand

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2005, 09:53:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Ahem... Does O'Connor actually believe that the death penalty is a deterrant?


who cares if it is a deterrant? Just kill the moron and save money.

Offline Airhead

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
      • http://www.ouchytheclown.com
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2005, 10:11:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
who cares if it is a deterrant? Just kill the moron and save money.


Uh...It costs more to execute a convicted murderer than it does to sentance them to life in prison.

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2005, 10:18:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Airhead
Uh...It costs more to execute a convicted murderer than it does to sentance them to life in prison.


Maybe.... but it shouldn't

Sentence somone to death and they should be executed very shortly afterwards.....no 20 years on death row....just off them.

I have a feeling about what your counter point will be...I'm ready for it.

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2005, 10:22:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Hmmm... define murder.


You first. The I will.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2005, 10:24:21 PM »
You used the word... tell us what you mean by it.
sand

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2005, 10:24:37 PM »
I disagree.  I think if your old enough to drive a car your old enough to be held accountable for your actions.

14 no way but 16, 17 heck ya

By 16 they should know right from wrong and know that actions have consequences.

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #10 on: March 01, 2005, 10:34:08 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
You used the word... tell us what you mean by it.


murder? You don't know what murder is and cannot define it?

I'm not the first to use the term.

Offline Airhead

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
      • http://www.ouchytheclown.com
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #11 on: March 01, 2005, 10:35:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
Maybe.... but it shouldn't

Sentence somone to death and they should be executed very shortly afterwards.....no 20 years on death row....just off them.

I have a feeling about what your counter point will be...I'm ready for it.


Well, I'm hope you're well lubed Nuke, because my counterpoint is that because of the hundreds of exonerated prisoners freed by new technology (and those many more convicted because of this new technology) we have a duty towards justice to insure we go well beyond a reasonable doubt before we exact the ultimate punishment.

We have to go all the way to beyond the shadow of a doubt, and that's where the line gets cloudy- one man's reasonable doubt is another man's beyond a shadow of a doubt.

We are not absolute, or perfect- we are humans, and as such it is impossible for us to be absolutely certain about anything, much less the sanctioned forfiture of another human being's life.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #12 on: March 01, 2005, 10:36:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
murder? You don't know what murder is and cannot deifine it?

I'm not the first to use the term.



That's not the question. Define what you meant by it. You've made a legal recommendation. Know define it in legal terms, please.

Seems to me that in court there is no such thing as simple murder.
sand

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #13 on: March 01, 2005, 10:37:03 PM »
Sandman, I'll make it easy.

Anyone who is convicted of murder should be put to death.....sooner rather than later.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Kids will be Kids
« Reply #14 on: March 01, 2005, 10:37:47 PM »
Any murder? What about manslaughter?
sand