Author Topic: Allied frame 1, good and bad  (Read 1154 times)

Offline 33Vortex

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4754
      • Dirac's equation (non truncated)
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« on: March 05, 2005, 12:22:11 AM »
Ok, I'll start with the bad stuff, makes it a little easier at the end. I found a few errors in tonight's frame.

#1. The B26 bomber was mainly used as a tactical bomber, not as a strategic industry bomber. I am not 100% on this but I do not believe the B26 was used in the numbers we saw in this event, as early as 1943. The main bomber of the USAAF in 1943 was without a doubt the B17.
The effect this has on the frame and event is that because of the 26's faster speed they become incredibly difficult to intercept and also lead when shooting.
- Only the B17 strategic bomber should have been available, the B26 tactical bomber not at all.

This error, though it may seem minor, pretty much ensured allied victory. One would think that the sheer number of planes (BUFFs) the LW had to shoot down would be enough, and add to that the fighter cover. It sure was enough irl, why sugar it with better planes? This was clearly set up to be a allied victory and that's too bad, it takes away a good portion of the fun of it. The B17 would have been a fair fight for the LW fighters in this event to take on, the fighter cover does not make it any easier.


For the german side, the A-5 and G-6 are good choices. The A-8 didn't see large scale production until 1944 and the D, never produced in large numbers, was not available until 1944 and at about the same time as the P51D entered the theater. The 190A-5 is, compared with the P51B, still at a quite distinct disadvantage especially at high altitude. The 109G-6 is a fine fighter but is in many respects also inferior to the P51B.
However, keep in mind it was in 1943 that the 190 became known as the 'Butcher Bird' by the allied bomber crews, and with good reason. On one occasion a group of 30 190s shot down 50 B17s in a time span of only 2 or 3 minutes. I don't know the details around that event though.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is how I see it. It is sad to see such a good event spoiled by historical inaccuracy and favoritism for the allied side. Like if the LWs task wasn't hard enough!



Okay... the good things about this event.
+ Great, it was just great, lots of participants, only one life... makes you want to hang on to the plane u got.
+ Historical map and setup. (Although it wasn't accurate)



To sum it up:

#1) Make events historically accurate in the future, to make it a fair fight. It really wouldn't have been a fair fight even if it was historically accurate but one can accept that since it is, historically accurate. Favoritism isn't needed, thankyou. It can be made historically accurate and still be a good fight, for both sides.
#2) The map was great, wish it was used more.
#3) For the love of god don't favor either side, just stick to historical facts, please! It makes it so much more enjoyable. It's not supposed to be easy, for either side. It can, and likely will be, favored to one side anyway even if kept strictly historical.
#4) Read #3 ten times.
#5) Take #3, write it down on a note, keep it under your pillow at night. Read it before going to sleep, and when waking up. Read it to your kids before you tuck them in (if you have any, otherwise the cat will do) until they also know it by heart.



Anyway, get my point? I sure hope so... Why bother playing an event that's obviously set up for one side to win? Had I known beforehand I may have opted out...

Okay, I'm tired, it's 0730 hrs and I gotta get off this PC and get some sleep. Dont get me wrong tho, it was a good event.
See you in the MA, and keep them fighters rolling off the prod line!

« Last Edit: March 05, 2005, 12:37:19 AM by 33Vortex »

GameID: Turner
Truth has no agenda.

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2005, 12:27:46 AM »
As far as I know the D Pony was not enabled.

I flew Allied with a P51 Bravo.
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!

Offline navajoboy

  • Probation
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
      • http://www.uknightedstates.net
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2005, 12:29:22 AM »
yes i was missed informed. i review film and they are bs not ds!
sorry vortex.

navajo24:aok
Stovpipe aka Navajo
Uknighted 357th FG - JG26
-+= Foreign Relations Minister =+-
http://www.uknightedstates.net

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2005, 12:35:59 AM »
Dont sweat it though,

I was in a similar situation with G-6's and G-10's, a few Squad Ops back.

As for the B26, I'm not sure off hand.
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10899
Re: Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2005, 04:08:40 AM »
Sorry you had a bad time Vortex but you don't want to advocate for the B-17 instead of the B-26.  The chief advantages for the B-26 over the B-17 is the good gun package and the smaller target it presents the attacker.

On the other hand, the arch of fire and visibility in the B-17 is much better and the B-17 has more guns to swing onto the attacker.  The B-17 would result in a higher fight; being 7 to 10K higher which should put you at a bigger disadvantage.  Also, I noticed our speed was about 30 mph slower then if we'd been in B-17s at the same altitude, and the B-17 carries 50% more bombs then the B-26.

S!

Quote
Originally posted by 33Vortex
Ok, I'll start with the bad stuff, makes it a little easier at the end. I found a few errors in tonight's frame.

#1. The B26 bomber was mainly used as a tactical bomber, not as a strategic industry bomber. I am not 100% on this but I do not believe the B26 was used in the numbers we saw in this event, as early as 1943. The main bomber of the USAAF in 1943 was without a doubt the B17.
The effect this has on the frame and event is that because of the 26's faster speed they become incredibly difficult to intercept and also lead when shooting.
- Only the B17 strategic bomber should have been available, the B26 tactical bomber not at all.

This error, though it may seem minor, pretty much ensured allied victory. One would think that the sheer number of planes (BUFFs) the LW had to shoot down would be enough, and add to that the fighter cover. It sure was enough irl, why sugar it with better planes? This was clearly set up to be a allied victory and that's too bad, it takes away a good portion of the fun of it. The B17 would have been a fair fight for the LW fighters in this event to take on, the fighter cover does not make it any easier.


For the german side, the A-5 and G-6 are good choices. The A-8 didn't see large scale production until 1944 and the D, never produced in large numbers, was not available until 1944 and at about the same time as the P51D entered the theater. The 190A-5 is, compared with the P51B, still at a quite distinct disadvantage especially at high altitude. The 109G-6 is a fine fighter but is in many respects also inferior to the P51B.
However, keep in mind it was in 1943 that the 190 became known as the 'Butcher Bird' by the allied bomber crews, and with good reason. On one occasion a group of 30 190s shot down 50 B17s in a time span of only 2 or 3 minutes. I don't know the details around that event though.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is how I see it. It is sad to see such a good event spoiled by historical inaccuracy and favoritism for the allied side. Like if the LWs task wasn't hard enough!



Okay... the good things about this event.
+ Great, it was just great, lots of participants, only one life... makes you want to hang on to the plane u got.
+ Historical map and setup. (Although it wasn't accurate)



To sum it up:

#1) Make events historically accurate in the future, to make it a fair fight. It really wouldn't have been a fair fight even if it was historically accurate but one can accept that since it is, historically accurate. Favoritism isn't needed, thankyou. It can be made historically accurate and still be a good fight, for both sides.
#2) The map was great, wish it was used more.
#3) For the love of god don't favor either side, just stick to historical facts, please! It makes it so much more enjoyable. It's not supposed to be easy, for either side. It can, and likely will be, favored to one side anyway even if kept strictly historical.
#4) Read #3 ten times.
#5) Take #3, write it down on a note, keep it under your pillow at night. Read it before going to sleep, and when waking up. Read it to your kids before you tuck them in (if you have any, otherwise the cat will do) until they also know it by heart.



Anyway, get my point? I sure hope so... Why bother playing an event that's obviously set up for one side to win? Had I known beforehand I may have opted out...

Okay, I'm tired, it's 0730 hrs and I gotta get off this PC and get some sleep. Dont get me wrong tho, it was a good event.
See you in the MA, and keep them fighters rolling off the prod line!

Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001

Offline 33Vortex

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4754
      • Dirac's equation (non truncated)
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2005, 06:00:55 AM »
The B17 was used and so it should have been in the event, it's simple. I didn't have a bad time, I shot down several bombers, it's just that it seemed odd to me that the B26 was used at all.

GameID: Turner
Truth has no agenda.

Offline daddog

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15082
      • http://www.332nd.org
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2005, 10:03:55 AM »
Thanks for the feed back 33Vortex. For what it is worth I will make a couple of points on how the CM’s view events. Everyone already told you it was the B not the D, but aside from that.

1 - The Squad Operations are not Scenarios where the historical facet holds a much greater significance.
2 - In Squad Operations we will sacrifice historical accuracy for game play balance.
3 – We do not include every aircraft available in a theatre/time period for various reasons.

I think the opportunity to fly B-17’s is much greater than B-26’s in our events. That may have been Pucks reasoning for his design. I don’t know. Maybe he will post in here.
Noses in the wind since 1997
332nd Flying Mongrels
daddog
Knowing for Sure

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Re: Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2005, 10:49:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 33Vortex
Ok, I'll start with the bad stuff, makes it a little easier at the end. I found a few errors in tonight's frame.


Errors are inevetable.  We don't have every aircraft, every airfield, every bit of hardware and manpower available to the beligerant forces of WWII.  We do what we can with what we have and make things as 'reasonable' as possible.  On the bright side, if you get shot down and fall to the earth in flames your parents don't get a telegram from the War Department and the blue star hanging in your mother's window doesn't turn gold.

Quote
Originally posted by 33Vortex
#1. The B26 bomber was mainly used as a tactical bomber, not as a strategic industry bomber. I am not 100% on this but I do not believe the B26 was used in the numbers we saw in this event, as early as 1943. The main bomber of the USAAF in 1943 was without a doubt the B17.


The B26 was the main bomber of the 9th Air Force, and it got used for almost EVERYTING with the single exception of mass carpet bombing raids.  The primary tactics used were to come in fast and hard at low and medium altitudes and blast whatever target was on the 9th's list that day.  This *included* industrial targets, but was mostly limited to small installations, airfields (hint), rail junctions, and the like.

Now, the B17s and B24s were the pervue of the 8th Air Force, and they did the bulk of the urban renewal.

Quote
Originally posted by 33Vortex
The effect this has on the frame and event is that because of the 26's faster speed they become incredibly difficult to intercept and also lead when shooting.
- Only the B17 strategic bomber should have been available, the B26 tactical bomber not at all.


I thought about this, but there were two problems:

1. The 9th Air Force didn't OWN any B17s
2. One pilot, three airplanes.  With a box of B17s the defensive firepower and 'throw weight', or amount of iron the bomber can drop, is more than doubled.  If you think the B26s were too much B17s would have been three times as bad.

Ok, really I was going to use B24s since I have a soft spot for those (that's what my father flew in during the war).  Unfortunatly a heavy bomber is too much for an airfield.

Allied:  4 Engine Heavy Bomber
Axis: 2 Engine light/medium Bomber

Didn't sound too equitable to me...  

Quote
Originally posted by 33Vortex
This error, though it may seem minor, pretty much ensured allied victory. One would think that the sheer number of planes (BUFFs) the LW had to shoot down would be enough, and add to that the fighter cover. It sure was enough irl, why sugar it with better planes?


I'm going to respectfully disagree with you here.  Speaking strictly for myself (and I haven't even been IN an aircraft in the AH main arena in forever) I find the B26 is much easier to kill in my trusty 190A-5 than a B17.  The B26 has fewer guns, a significantly larger blind spot, and is enough smaller the 20mm cannons can chop vital bits off pretty quick.  The 26s also tend to operate much lower.  Consider what your post would have said had the SAME number of B17s flown by at 25,000 feet and you had to climb up to greet them...

Quote
Originally posted by 33Vortex
This was clearly set up to be a allied victory and that's too bad, it takes away a good portion of the fun of it. The B17 would have been a fair fight for the LW fighters in this event to take on, the fighter cover does not make it any easier.


Actually it was set up with a German advantage on the map.  There is a huge Allied bias in pilots who participate (just look at the initial side requests...) so I set the map up to favor the Luftwaffe.  A crack 190A-5 squad or two and the Allied forces would have been a light morning snack over the continent.  Unfortunatly there just aren't that many people who take the time to learn German iron anymore.  What I CAN'T do is skew the event to make up for pilot bias; I have to assume the sides will have (roughly) even numbers and skill levels.

Quote
Originally posted by 33Vortex
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is how I see it. It is sad to see such a good event spoiled by historical inaccuracy and favoritism for the allied side. Like if the LWs task wasn't hard enough!


No kidding.  In the four or so years I've been hovering around AH we've gone from having a very strong (if oft-maligned :) ) Luftwaffe presence to nearly none at all.  It's frustrating to design frames knowing the Germans (or Japanese, or Italians) won't have the strength they should because the poeple flying don't have the comfort levels in the aircraft they'd have in a P47 or P51.  I don't have an answer for that one; the only option would be: historical inaccuracy.  I could have brought in the 190 D-9 and the Luftwaffe wouldn't have needed much skill.  The hue and cry would have been endless, though...

This was as accurate as I could get.  The map was limited, but that's the map we have.  The plane set is right, if not complete.  The 9th air force was invited, not the 8th.  They were dying over Berlin.


Quote
Originally posted by 33Vortex
#3) For the love of god don't favor either side, just stick to historical facts, please! It makes it so much more enjoyable. It's not supposed to be easy, for either side. It can, and likely will be, favored to one side anyway even if kept strictly historical.
#4) Read #3 ten times.
#5) Take #3, write it down on a note, keep it under your pillow at night. Read it before going to sleep, and when waking up. Read it to your kids before you tuck them in (if you have any, otherwise the cat will do) until they also know it by heart.


Not much of an event then.  Lessee...Air war over Europe.  Americans fly mission with 800 bombers and 600 fighters.  Germans respond with one quick pass by 10 Me 109G6s, then run like [heck] from the 125 P-51Ds that dive to intercept...

Seriously, the air war was *NEVER* even.  For any given engagement one side or the other had an overwelming advantage.  My dad tells me stories of unending boredom followed by what turns out to be seconds or maybe minutes of unending terror followed by hours of more boredom.

We can't DO that in FSO.  We need to make sure everyone has something to fight, something to do, and the time between take off, doing it, and landing is as short as possible.

HTH.  HAND.  :)


...formatting fixes...I missed a few brackets
« Last Edit: March 05, 2005, 10:56:08 AM by Puck »
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2005, 10:55:52 AM »
Wrong again Vortex.

Quotes from Roger Freemans "Mighty Eigth" The Chapter is called Martins Maligned Madame.

"Not until March 7th 1943 did the first of the 322nd Group Marauders put down on Bury St Edmunds"

"May 14th saw there first mission, an Electrical Generating plant near ljmuiden on the Dutch Coast"

Yadda Yadda Yadda,

"On October 16th. the 4 B26 Groups were transferred to the Ninth Air Force, newly established in the UK charged with building up US tactical Air Power for the Allied Invasion of Europe"

Even our B26C "Flakbait", Serial Number 41-31773, Which can be seen in the Smithsonian, arrived in May 1943 at Bury St Edmunds.
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Re: Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2005, 11:26:28 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 33Vortex
To sum it up:

#1) Make events historically accurate in the future, to make it a fair fight.


Part one of this sentance really has nothing to do with part two of this sentance.

Anyhow, the B-26 was historically accurate, and while I don't know what target alt the other B26 guys were trying to use, but at our target alt of 15k, the speed difference between the B-17 and B-26 is about 10mph. If anyone went to 20k, the B-17 becomes faster than the B-26.

I would have rather had the B-17... I needed those extra bombs lol.

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline skernsk

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5089
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2005, 01:42:17 PM »
In late 1942 (September) several missions on German airfields in France were conducted by A-20's flown by the 15th Light Bombardment Squadron

March 7, 1943

The first air echelon of the 332d Medium Bombardment Group, in B-26's, arrives from the United States.

source Air War Europa.

By December of 1943 (the time of this event) there were several squadrons flying B-26's.  Do a google search for more info.  

By late 1943 the big bombers (B17 and B24) were tasked with primarily long range missions deep into Germany.  It made sense, the smaller bombers did not have the range.

The medium range bombers were used for just the type of missions that occured last night in the squad ops.  Attacking airfields, supply dumps, ports and marshalling yards in France and western Europe.


Rather than focus on the B17's like most I enjoy a different war.  the medium bombers were tasked with difficuly missions and many of them were lost.  Unfortunately their mission was overshadowed by the long range, bigger bombers.  

It would be cool to see RAF escort along with the B26's and rules more strict in altitudes.  Most of the frames are alt grabbing affiars.


If I had any complaint I would say that we need to bring the action lower to the ground where we can mix it up.  At least put a cap of 20,000.  A strong wind layer can be put in to make sure none go higher.  I found myself somewhat bored flying circles stalling at 28K knowing that we had to be that high to fend off higher P51's.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2005, 01:49:09 PM by skernsk »

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10899
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2005, 02:37:59 PM »
For future reference...

As a practical mater, putting a multiplayer formation of B17s above 32,000 feet or putting B-26s above 16,000 feet isn't possible.  To do so means you have a gaggle of dispersed players, not any kind of formation.
Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2005, 03:17:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Easyscor
For future reference...

As a practical mater, putting a multiplayer formation of B17s above 32,000 feet or putting B-26s above 16,000 feet isn't possible.  To do so means you have a gaggle of dispersed players, not any kind of formation.


Whew, I was affraid it was just because we sucked! lol.

Last night we had a Target alt of 15k, but were unable to keep formation, at that alt, because when we would reduce throttle, we'd lose alt. So we ended up going into the target at 13k, because it was the only way we coudl get any of us close enough for mutual defense.

I want to post an AAR, because it was a lot of fun (in-spite of the bellybutton kicking we recieved! lol) but I'm up to my ears in Scenario stuff right now.

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #13 on: March 05, 2005, 03:27:01 PM »
If anyone is interested in the speed comparrison of the B-17 and B-26 in AH:






-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline skernsk

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5089
Allied frame 1, good and bad
« Reply #14 on: March 05, 2005, 03:47:48 PM »
Sik, don't get me wrong.  Simply put, altitude is life and the one that is caught lower when contact is made is in trouble.

.  The frames are designed so that we will see combat .. that is inevitable.  So my point is to try and have contact and dogfights at more resonable altitudes.  If we cap at a reasonable altitude by using a wind layer then we will perhaps see different tactics and better fights.  Wind layers have been used successfully in KOTH to keep the planes below the max.