Author Topic: Oil in the ANWR (Read 934 times)

JB88 · « **Reply #45 on:** March 11, 2005, 07:06:54 AM »

sounds like its time for the united states to get off the oil crackpipe and start thinking of some new ways to create energy....and actually doing it.

shouldnt be hard. we adopted the metric system didnt we?

oh, wait. bad example.

Rolex · « **Reply #46 on:** March 11, 2005, 07:50:03 AM »

According to the National Enquirer, those thousands of capped wells [

] can't be uncapped because Elvis is alive and living in them and that's where the government and GM are secretly storing the carburetors that get 250 miles-per-gallon - and even more using tap water as fuel.

Really. I'm serious.

oboe · « **Reply #47 on:** March 11, 2005, 08:48:57 AM »

So THATS where you get your information, Rolex!

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #48 on:** March 11, 2005, 08:57:17 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by NUKE
That's my point.

The same with ANWR.....just a wasteland pretty much.

Fool

mora · « **Reply #49 on:** March 11, 2005, 10:26:49 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by oboe
By manipulating the tax rates, they can negate or minimize the effect of price shocks on the oil market

I don't think that has ever happened in any European country. It certainly would never happen here. The commies, the other left leaners, and the greens are so over represented in most goverments in Europe that they would sabotage any suchs attempts. One of the most important issues for the said groups is to ban private automobiles and all air traffic, or at least hinder their use with all means available. Economic growth or stability is very much secondary.

eskimo2 · « **Reply #50 on:** March 11, 2005, 11:07:03 AM »

A lot of the environmentalist whiners don’t have a clue how little land is actually affected. I think they should fly across northern Alaska, west to east, and stare out the window as miles and miles of tundra go by. A four foot diameter pipe running across hundreds of miles of wilderness is not such a big deal.

eskimo