Author Topic: Art vs Porn (Read 1239 times)

CPorky · « **Reply #30 on:** March 11, 2005, 04:33:54 PM »

Thats simple, if you would not mind your daughter getting her picture taken, its art, and if you do, its porn.

Siaf__csf · « **Reply #31 on:** March 11, 2005, 04:44:38 PM »

Hmm.. she's only 1 you perv!

Airhead · « **Reply #32 on:** March 11, 2005, 06:32:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Staga
So it's not work safe in US of A to see a painting from Rubens from your computer screen?
Have you thought about burning books and paintings yet???

Nah, that's a tatic of the Nazis and their allies, among them the Finns.

TweetyBird · « **Reply #33 on:** March 11, 2005, 08:03:34 PM »

The difference between art and porn is *most* people respect art, and *most* don't respect porn. There is no objective test for art, porn, pretty, ugly, useful, obsolete, worth, or even good and evil (e.g., is a prey animal gulping up a defenseless hatchling evil?).
The term art and porn desribe people's reactions to a work, not the work. It also shows humans are slow learners. We wipe sometihng "evil" from the face of the earth only to discover "er, I think we needed that.."

Vulcan · « **Reply #34 on:** March 11, 2005, 08:20:02 PM »

I respect porn!

Hell I worship it!

TweetyBird · « **Reply #35 on:** March 11, 2005, 08:26:28 PM »

>>I respect porn!

Hell I worship it!

<<

er *most* people - "most" being key

vorticon · « **Reply #36 on:** March 11, 2005, 08:39:25 PM »

its a simple distinction...porn is like pirate school...art is like watching leviathan pull a reversal on someone else

Lizking · « **Reply #37 on:** March 11, 2005, 08:42:01 PM »

If you whack off to it, it is porn. Not such a hard distinction to make, now is it.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #38 on:** March 11, 2005, 08:51:58 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lizking
If you whack off to it, it is porn. Not such a hard distinction to make, now is it.

People have been known to whack off to the naked pigmies in National Geographic too.

also the Sports illustrated Swimsuit Edition

Didnt realise those magazine were porn.

vorticon · « **Reply #39 on:** March 11, 2005, 08:57:15 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by DREDIOCK
People have been known to whack off to the naked pigmies in National Geographic too.

also the Sports illustrated Swimsuit Edition

Didnt realise those magazine were porn.

if its INTENDED to be whacked off to...

Lizking · « **Reply #40 on:** March 11, 2005, 09:18:04 PM »

By definition, it is porn if you whack off to it, be it a picture of Jesus, Halle Berry or a severed head.

Art can be anything. Good art is worth money.

bunch · « **Reply #41 on:** March 11, 2005, 09:35:38 PM »

In a fight between art & porn, my money is on porn

Siaf__csf · « **Reply #42 on:** March 12, 2005, 12:27:35 AM »

Halle Berry is teh porn.

Quote

Nah, that's a tatic of the Nazis and their allies, among them the Finns.

Sometimes the name is an omen.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #43 on:** March 12, 2005, 12:38:37 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lizking
By definition, it is porn if you whack off to it, be it a picture of Jesus, Halle Berry or a severed head.

Art can be anything. Good art is worth money.

LOL Have you checked out the prices of Porn movies these days?

Nash · « **Reply #44 on:** March 12, 2005, 12:52:53 AM »

Art vs Porn?

Why the "vs"? In a perfect world; Artery, pornography, living in perfect harmony.

Yeah you had it right Sand... Was Koons. Gettin' it on with that Italian slut-I-mean-politician. They're done like dinner now, but... I've had a couple beers with the dude and the entire marriage was one big act of art.... er what were we just talking about?

Anyways, yeah.