Author Topic: Screw the 190's.... (Read 1563 times)

Wmaker · « **Reply #30 on:** March 30, 2005, 01:26:14 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Karnak
B-17G (1.00), B-26B (1.00), Lancaster Mk III (1.04) are in the same time frames as the others you mentioned.

Yep I know.

That's why I said *for example*.

Allthough the B-17 recieved similar treatment as 109F/Gs in one of the AH2 betas so I doubt it will get reworked anytime soon...

Personally, I would like to see Macchis updated next but there other good canditates as well...from now on the order doesn't really matter much when talking about the older ones...as long as they are done.

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #31 on:** March 30, 2005, 11:09:20 AM »

why would one fly a jug when they could fly a a8?

DaddyAck · « **Reply #32 on:** March 30, 2005, 11:30:40 AM »

I agree that the A8 is an awesome weapon ;however, it is more apt to a bomber interceptor than a ground attacker. In my most humble opinion.

YUCCA · « **Reply #33 on:** March 30, 2005, 04:12:54 PM »

cause jug beats a8

Karnak · « **Reply #34 on:** March 30, 2005, 04:37:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Wmaker
Allthough the B-17 recieved similar treatment as 109F/Gs in one of the AH2 betas so I doubt it will get reworked anytime soon

It didn't get reworked. It just got a high rez skin. The polygon model is still the same old AH1 v1.00 model it always was. Only the Bf109F and Bf109Gs got a polygon rework for AH2 v2.00.

Wmaker · « **Reply #35 on:** March 30, 2005, 06:03:01 PM »

Hmm...they didn't rework it much but they sure did a little work on it...compare the propeller hubs and engine nacelles between AH1 and AH2...