« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 7   Go Down

Author Topic: Nearly 2 years later  (Read 2039 times)

Offline ChickenHawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1010
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #15 on: April 26, 2005, 02:10:18 PM »
Watch an episode of Jaywalking on the Tonite Show with Jay Leno and all faith in humanity will be further eroded.
Logged
Do not attribute to malice what can be easily explained by incompetence, fear, ignorance or stupidity, because there are millions more garden variety idiots walking around in the world than there are blackhearted Machiavellis.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #16 on: April 26, 2005, 02:52:09 PM »
The poll questions were in the link steve.
So you can come up with a weird excuse or you can really read the article.


 
How likely is it that Saddam Hussein was personally involved in
   the September 11 terrorist attacks ?
69 % said likley or very likley.

two days after the attack the same question was pegged at 78%
Logged

Offline airbumba

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1293
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #17 on: April 26, 2005, 03:54:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Raider179
A better question would be

How many Americans give a rat's bellybutton what a canadian thinks?



Haha, I love knowing that people of your nature still exist, hahaha. Thanks for making my day, sorry for interupting your soaps, you may continue,.

lol, what a guy. hahaha.
Logged
I used to be a fatalist,
but that part of me died.

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #18 on: April 26, 2005, 03:56:38 PM »
This view is changed depending on who's arguing what point. 49% of America was smart enough to realize Bush needed to be replaced, but 79% of America is dumb enough to actually believe Sadaam was behind the bombings.

Blah blah blah. Take a poll, make it prove your point, write an article for the times. blah blah blah.

A better question would be: do you believe that neither Sadaam nor the Iraqi government had any role in terrorism. Then you could laugh at the obscene paranoia of a much larger percentage of Americans (and Canadians). Either that or ignore the question to debate the definition of terrorism.
Logged

Offline VOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #19 on: April 26, 2005, 04:28:50 PM »
Saddam didn't know a thing about 911. He would have warned us if he had.

 It's common knowledge that he was trying to turn over a new leaf after GW1 and he really was just a cooperative, misunderstood man.

Saddam awoke the morning of 911 just as shocked and speechless as I did since his own intelligence assets were busy ensuring compliance with UN 1441.

Saddam is a victim.
Logged

Offline Raider179

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #20 on: April 26, 2005, 04:34:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by airbumba
Haha, I love knowing that people of your nature still exist, hahaha. Thanks for making my day, sorry for interupting your soaps, you may continue,.

lol, what a guy. hahaha.


lol no problem but after all it was in response to a stupid post in the first place. a 2 year old poll with no new data. wonder why I said it still?
Logged

Offline VOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #21 on: April 26, 2005, 04:53:46 PM »
Too bad Saddam is Muslim...he would have been a shoe-in for Pope.
Logged

Offline Steve

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #22 on: April 26, 2005, 05:36:42 PM »
Quote
So you can come up with a weird excuse or you can really read the article.


Let's cut to the chase:  plow off you leftist whacko.


Quote
personally involved


This phrase is completely subjective.  I'm not making excuses for anything. I'm pointing out that the poll is a long way from scientific.  Shove that in your pipe and smoke it.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2005, 05:38:55 PM by Steve »
Logged
Member: Hot Soup Mafia - Cream of Myshroom
Army of Muppets  Yes, my ingame name is Steve

Offline Skydancer

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1606
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #23 on: April 26, 2005, 05:42:52 PM »
Hey Steve how you always end up resorting to the F88k you type response?

Calm down and grow some manners huh?

Just an observation pal.
Logged

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #24 on: April 26, 2005, 05:43:06 PM »
What chase. Im hitting you in the head with your own stupidity.
A chase would imply there was some contest and this is no contest.
Im rubbing your face in your own feces you sorry brain washed clown.
Logged

Offline Steve

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #25 on: April 26, 2005, 06:04:49 PM »
Not a very good effort Manblow... err pongo.  Like I said, the poll is entirely subjective and a long way from scientific.  You could admit this, but then you won't because you'd be admitting  that I am correct.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2005, 06:09:21 PM by Steve »
Logged
Member: Hot Soup Mafia - Cream of Myshroom
Army of Muppets  Yes, my ingame name is Steve

Offline Steve

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #26 on: April 26, 2005, 06:06:05 PM »
Skyperson, save your obsessions for Toad, please.
Logged
Member: Hot Soup Mafia - Cream of Myshroom
Army of Muppets  Yes, my ingame name is Steve

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #27 on: April 26, 2005, 06:07:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo
70 % of americans thought Iraq behind 9/11 2 years after the attack

and nearly 4 years after 911 I wonder how many still think that Iraq was involved?


Ok.
Logged

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3907
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #28 on: April 26, 2005, 06:16:01 PM »
spe·cious   Audio pronunciation of "specious" ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (spshs)
adj.

   1. Having the ring of truth or plausibility but actually fallacious: a specious argument.
   2. Deceptively attractive.
Logged

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Nearly 2 years later
« Reply #29 on: April 26, 2005, 06:35:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve
Not a very good effort Manblow... err pongo.  Like I said, the poll is entirely subjective and a long way from scientific.  You could admit this, but then you won't because you'd be admitting  that I am correct.


No it wasnt. Your hiding behind that cause you a winey brainwashed coward. But the question was specific and I posted it exaclty to you. A 1000 person random sample is a very scientific sample. The rest of the questions are in link in the article.
The only thing thats not scientific is your hatefull disgusting response to the simple truth of the same poll questions over 4 polls  in a time frame spanning days after 911 and the last one 2 years after.

Easy to see how people could believe it though. the alternative is to face the hate and insults of people like yourself. Believe it or your a coward. Believe it or your a queer. Believe it or your a terrorist lover.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 7   Go Up
« previous next »