Author Topic: Dean of America's economists challenges notions on free trade  (Read 148 times)

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
Paul Samuelson, author of the most widely read college economics text book in the world, is challenging the notion that free trade/offshoring is a win-win situation for all countries.  I heard it on the radio tonight and am still looking for a link to a piece he apparently did for the Journal of Economic Perspectives in which he makes the case.

Apparently he says at some point critical mass will be reached in the technical abilities and education levels of cheap-labor countries, and the scale will tip in favor of the 3rd world, permanently damaging the US's edge in technical innovation.
He also suggests the downward pressure on domestic wages due to offshoring isn't offset by lower prices of imported foreign goods.

It's something I've suspected in my bones for a long time; I was belittled as a stupid protectionist in plenty of discussions with coworkers for those views, too.   Sure is nice to have the Nation's Number 1 economist make your argument.

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
Dean of America's economists challenges notions on free trade
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2005, 08:23:09 PM »
OK here is a dated link, I think he wrote up something more recent than this though:

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/09/29/rethinking_free_trade/

Offline Torque

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2091
Dean of America's economists challenges notions on free trade
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2005, 10:16:56 PM »
once water pushes oil off its pedestal, all that will be trivial.

Offline joowenn

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
Dean of America's economists challenges notions on free trade
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2005, 12:31:39 AM »
Quote

Apparently he says at some point critical mass will be reached in the technical abilities and education levels of cheap-labor countries, and the scale will tip in favor of the 3rd world, permanently damaging the US's edge in technical innovation.


>> I wonder if he could be right about that.