« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Realistic Plane lists  (Read 1878 times)

Offline Wolf14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 858
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #30 on: May 23, 2005, 10:26:36 PM »
I like many others would like to see the B-25 and I think the P-39 would kinda be cool as well.
Logged

Offline Sp4de

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
      • http://www.freewebs.com/decommissisoned1/
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #31 on: May 23, 2005, 10:55:35 PM »
-Ground-
Willy jeep
Sherman

-Air-
P61
f8f


This too....
Logged

Offline NoBaddy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2943
      • http://www.damned.org
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #32 on: May 24, 2005, 12:15:02 AM »
P38/P63

M-7 Priest
Logged
NoBaddy (NB)

Flying since before there was virtual durt!!
"Ego is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity."

Offline Iceman24

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 706
      • http://479th.jasminemarie.com/
new planes for ah2
« Reply #33 on: May 24, 2005, 10:22:26 AM »
how about the b25's and maybe a b29 or 2 of i recall the b29 is probably the most historical plane ever since it dropped the a bombs, make them perk bombers. heck we can even put an a bomb on the game make it 3,000 perk points and make it to where we can take out an enemy base or 2 for like 3 days or so because of radiation... that would be cool... but we really need b25's, i can't believe the lancs and b26's are on here but no mitchells. they can replace that stupid ar234 ( useless ) :aok
Logged

Offline Iceman24

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 706
      • http://479th.jasminemarie.com/
new gv
« Reply #34 on: May 24, 2005, 10:36:19 AM »
i think a line of the sherman tanks would be pretty cool we got the panzer and the t34 why not have a sherman
Logged

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: new gv
« Reply #35 on: May 24, 2005, 10:55:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Iceman24
i think a line of the sherman tanks would be pretty cool we got the panzer and the t34 why not have a sherman


Ok ... this makes up for the B-29 request. ;)
Logged

Offline Karash

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #36 on: May 24, 2005, 11:12:12 AM »
Doesn't HT have to consider the flight physics of each plane it models in the game?  I would assume some of the popular planes like the Judy would be easier than some of these more obscure picks.
Logged

Offline Iceman24

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 706
      • http://479th.jasminemarie.com/
new planes
« Reply #37 on: May 24, 2005, 11:41:30 AM »
Ok ... this makes up for the B-29 request.


yeah yeah yeah it would be cool though lol
Logged

Offline Flackie

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
      • http://www.flackmonkey.com
A few new things
« Reply #38 on: May 25, 2005, 05:38:08 PM »
ok first off the ar234 perks should be dropped by 10% then make the payload more real to life... because the ar234 could carry 2x500 kg on the wings and a 1000 kg on the belly of the aircraft...

Add a new bomber, b-29 super fortress... make it cost about 200 perks when all are teams equal in numbers...

for the ground I would like to see a sherman, and a flame thrower tank, not to sure what the name of it was though...
Logged

Offline StarOfAfrica2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5162
      • http://www.vf-17.org
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #39 on: May 25, 2005, 06:39:47 PM »
G4M Betty


P39

Ki-43 Oscar



Brewster Buffalo


Sorry, 2 was impossible to do.  :)
Logged

Offline Spongebob

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 64
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #40 on: May 26, 2005, 09:44:34 PM »
P39

B25

How can you deny these two models in a WWII air combat game made in the good old USA? Screw the Euro-snobs and rice rockets I want more American Iron! What the heck I'm feeling generous... add two P39s and make one a Russian variant.

Magoo
Logged

Offline MarekPL

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
PZL-11
« Reply #41 on: June 06, 2005, 12:21:23 PM »
Logged

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #42 on: June 06, 2005, 07:13:58 PM »
Now, the PZL-11 belongs with early war, - and early war needs quite a bit to fill the planeset. I am afraid that not much from there will see the grace of HTC soon.
You'd say PZL-11, Gladiator, Henschel bipe, Fiat Bipe, I-Bipe, and then the I-16 as very much the most likely, - absolutely essential for early war eastern front.
You'd also need the D-520, A Fokker, A Brewster, the He 111, the Ju52, 109D, a Blenheim or Wellington, and we're still in 1940/41
My first out of those would be the I-16 and He-111.
Why? Well, they were multiple variants, serving for years. A late cannon armed I-16 is a nasty one to dogfight, and the He-111 is a multi purpose aircraft being able to do stuff like lobbing around with a V-1 under it's belly.
Will post some 1941-1942 stuff later perhaps....


Should make a thread like : "What 1939 aircraft do you want into AH, pleas give two only"....:)
Logged
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline TheThang

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #43 on: June 06, 2005, 08:18:43 PM »
P-39Q AiraCobra And an F8F1-b Bearcat.
Logged

Offline Arcades057

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 231
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #44 on: June 06, 2005, 09:58:33 PM »
We need more perked bombers I think.  So...

1) HS 129 with underwing-mounted anti-armor cannons

2) Bomber version of the ME262

Also, how about some perked GVs?

1) IS 1, 2 or 3

2) M-26

3) Panther

4) Jagd-anything

5) Wespe

6) ISU 120 or 150 for those hard to reach places :)

Maybe a few new fighters...

1) P-39 (Russian and American versions)

2) Perked Meteor (maybe limited to only a few bases)

Speaking of which, the idea of having the Komet available at only a few fields makes me wonder:  What if a certain LARGE bomber were added to the list but available at only one or two fields?  The B-29 Strato would seriously shift the balance of power toward the buff-drivers--therefore if it were limited to taking off from  select few fields, only those serious enough to climb in for the long haul, ie those who want to do more than fly a sector and suicide themselves to knock out a town, will take it up.

The Meteor would be a counter to the ME262, but I've seen only a few of them flying and have yet to be engaged by one, even when I tried fighting it.  Even some of the bigger, badder tanks and AA carriers could be used as a last-ditch defense of a few remaining fields.  Imagine...

The Rooks and Knights have pushed the Bishops intoa corner, swallowing territory like a fat man swallows his weight at a buffet...  Five Rook Tigers, twelve Pzs. and eight Flaks start the trip over the hill.  Suddenly a Tiger brews up, its turret flying into the air.  As the crews scramble a Flak, and then another are turned into smoldering pits.  The Pz crews panic as another Tiger explodes:  A Jagdtiger is maneuvering into positionfor another shot...!

I'd love to see it play out...
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »