I want to address the "flag" debate.
It seems to me that warfare, when broken down into its most basic form, is capture the flag.
When you play chess, your goal is to capture the opponents king, or flag if you will.
When you bash in your neighboring cavemans head and steal his woman, you have captured the flag.
When you kill an opponent in a plane you have captured the flag.
AH as well as WB will always have a flag to capture. Thats warfare.
Cabby is one of these guys that is always talking about how much strategy is lacking in WBs as well as AH and I can see his point. But honestly, what are you going to do?
You are going to beat your opponent and thereby capture the flag.
End of debate.
Strategy, on the other hand, deserves its own thread.
Yeager
