Grand jury indicts mother who hired stripper for son's birthday party

[parker00]

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
People should be more concerned about the drug store violating the confideliality of the plaintiffs private property (photographs) let alone turning them in to the authorities.

What does that tell about the society? The US starts to look more and more like DDR lately.

Well here in the USA we have laws that say you can't print porn without a license. Photoshops will usually just throw them away but if it looked like a crime was happening (which it was) then it's their duty to report it.


You would also think people should be more concerned with their own country instead of someones elses but we can't get that through to some people.

[Siaf__csf]

Private photographs are not porn. It is also not the business of the developer to rate or judge the photographs taken by a private person for his/her private use.

Is sexuality really worse than murder down there? It sure starts to look like that.

[indy007]

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
People should be more concerned about the drug store violating the confideliality of the plaintiffs private property (photographs) let alone turning them in to the authorities.

What does that tell about the society? The US starts to look more and more like DDR lately.

I believe they could be held liable if they did not report the alleged crime.

[Maverick]

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
Private photographs are not porn. It is also not the business of the developer to rate or judge the photographs taken by a private person for his/her private use.

Is sexuality really worse than murder down there? It sure starts to look like that.

Siaf,

Frankly you don't have a clue about laws here in the states. Porn is porn whether they are private photos or not. The developer has a legal obligation to turn over evidence of an illegal act. The stripper for minors fits that situation, period. If they do not they are liable for criminal action themselves.

Local entities like towns, cities, counties and states can and do enact laws regaarding conduct that a minor may engage in or be exposed to. The terms lewd and lascivious are likely to be the core of the charges related to the photos. If the jurisdiction has laws prohibiting the processing of photos showing nudity the developer has no choice again.

No, sexuality is not worse than murder here. Your perceptions are very clouded if you think so. If the laws on this side of the ocean bother you, just don't bother to read anything about them. I'm sure no one here will be concerned if that happens.

[parker00]

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
Private photographs are not porn. It is also not the business of the developer to rate or judge the photographs taken by a private person for his/her private use.

Is sexuality really worse than murder down there? It sure starts to look like that.

Just look at the reaction 1 nipple did in this country during the superbowl.

[Curval]

Next birthday...a gun party for some good CLEAN fun!:aok

[culero]

Originally posted by parker00
Just look at the reaction 1 nipple did in this country during the superbowl.

To our everlasting shame.

culero (nudity isn't porn, folks)

[Fishu]

The big brother is watching you. Do not use film cameras if you don't develop the pictures yourself.

[Eagler]

any one else seen the inbred mom on the tele?

all animals produce offspring, but not all can raise them properly

[Airhead]

Originally posted by rpm
I never realised Virgil was one of "THOSE". (THOSE being an anal retentive yokel in this case.) Teenagers saw boobies. Oh, the horror...THE HORROR!

Well, count me as one of "those" too then, but I agree with Virgil's take and thought it was well stated.  

(shrug)