Author Topic: B-52  (Read 1810 times)

Offline 2bighorn

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2829
B-52
« Reply #45 on: June 14, 2005, 08:40:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SuperDud
I WANT NOOKIES!
So, that's you then?


Offline SMIDSY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1248
B-52
« Reply #46 on: June 14, 2005, 09:34:03 PM »
hehehe, dr strangelove is a hilarious movie. "HAY!! NO FIGHTING IN THE WAR ROOM!!"

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
B-52
« Reply #47 on: June 14, 2005, 10:33:41 PM »


 I want one of these..!

 Heck, it's only 10 miles long....

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
B-52
« Reply #48 on: June 15, 2005, 03:35:52 PM »
I'd vulch that...

Quote
B26s were relatively hard for the newer pilots to fly if I recall correctly, something control surfaces maybe or maybe was engines?


It was due to it's high landing speed alot of accidents occured.

Offline SuperDud

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4589
B-52
« Reply #49 on: June 15, 2005, 04:05:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by 2bighorn
So, that's you then?




Too old;)
SuperDud
++Blue Knights++

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
B-52
« Reply #50 on: June 15, 2005, 10:07:59 PM »
I could care less about the B-29 being in or not.  However,
some of you clowns go to some amazing lengths to redicule the
idea.  The bird scares you that much?
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline TrueKill

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
B-52
« Reply #51 on: June 15, 2005, 11:45:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rino
I could care less about the B-29 being in or not.  However,
some of you clowns go to some amazing lengths to redicule the
idea.  The bird scares you that much?


no its the thought of dweebs taking a formation of B29s 10ft off the ground and sua-bombing the whole base.

Offline SuperDud

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4589
B-52
« Reply #52 on: June 16, 2005, 01:31:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by TrueKill
no its the thought of dweebs taking a formation of B29s 10ft off the ground and sua-bombing the whole base.


That and the fact we have a vast majority of US bombers. Plus, I just want nookies!
SuperDud
++Blue Knights++

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
B-52
« Reply #53 on: June 17, 2005, 06:06:44 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by TrueKill
lol shows how smart greenpeace is....

At 8.15 on 5 August 1945, a US B52 bomber dropped the first nuclear bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima causing tens of thousands of deaths.

I find four things wrong in the first sentence.

1. August 6th

2. B29

3. Atom Bomb

4. Dont know the exact number but it was in the 200,000 death range.


I'd give her some slack: on August 6th at 8:15 am Japan Time, it was still the 5th in the USA .  And atom bomb is a nuclear bomb, so #3 is okay...  The number of deaths is still disputed to this day, so the only dead bang bonehead thing she said was 52 instead of 29.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
B-52
« Reply #54 on: June 17, 2005, 06:15:30 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
I'd give her some slack: on August 6th at 8:15 am Japan Time, it was still the 5th in the USA .  And atom bomb is a nuclear bomb, so #3 is okay...  The number of deaths is still disputed to this day, so the only dead bang bonehead thing she said was 52 instead of 29.


Must have been some kind of time warp The second prototype, the YB-52, was actually the first to get airborne. The YB-52 (49-231) rolled out of the assembly hangar on March 15, 1952 and flew on April 15, 1952. (the first was used for ground testing)

Offline TrueKill

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
B-52
« Reply #55 on: June 17, 2005, 06:56:24 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
I'd give her some slack: on August 6th at 8:15 am Japan Time, it was still the 5th in the USA .  And atom bomb is a nuclear bomb, so #3 is okay...  The number of deaths is still disputed to this day, so the only dead bang bonehead thing she said was 52 instead of 29.


but it was aug. 6th hwere they droped it. atom bomb is a nuclear bomb but its an atom bomb. deaths where in the hundreds of thousands not tens. if they want to dispute something they atleast need to read up on it first.

Offline SMIDSY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1248
B-52
« Reply #56 on: June 17, 2005, 07:41:15 AM »
if any planes are added they should be the Pe-2 and the He-111 then mabey some eyetye bombers. i say we should be able so send in plane models rather than just skins and submit them for aproval. this would create a massive subcontracting effort and sooner than you can wright a flaming thread about the lack of planes you will have every plane in WWII at your disposal.

Offline viper215

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1076
      • http://www.bops.us
B-52
« Reply #57 on: June 24, 2005, 12:33:52 AM »
geaz just give us a bomber with the abomb everyone is going to drop to low and nuke themselves anayways

or

perk the bomber like 500 perks would stop a total abomb war
- Viper215 - Birds of Prey - Falcon Wing -
               - www.bops.us -

Offline SAS_KID

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1098
      • http://www.myspace.com/saskid
B-52
« Reply #58 on: June 24, 2005, 12:59:39 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DaYooper
Just remember, the samurai sword killed more people in WWII than did the atom bomb.

Maybe pilots ejecting from Nip planes should get a sword instead of a .45.  :p


Ya if I eject im guna charge a tank with a sword.....KAMAKAZIIIIIIIIIIII III!
Quote from: hitech on Today at 09:27:26 AM
What utter and compete BS, quite frankly I should kick you off this bbs for this post.

The real truth is you do not like the answer.

HiTech