Author Topic: Political explosion in t-5,4,3,2.... (Read 9512 times)

Krusher · « **Reply #180 on:** July 14, 2005, 01:29:05 PM »

So how does this compare to the administration that hired Craig Livingston to pull the (classified) FBI files on several hundred republicans? I bet this never gets mentioned during the "get rove" rah rah parties. Do you think it might when the US senator who helped get him the job runs for president?

Prior administrations never ever ever leaked information on people like say Linda Trips high school misbehavior.

call me when Rove is indicted for actually breaking the law. If and when he is, you can giggle all day.

DrDea · « **Reply #181 on:** July 14, 2005, 01:32:53 PM »

And I'll get the rope for ya.Right now it looks like a shark feeding frenzy with no food involved.

lazs2 · « **Reply #182 on:** July 14, 2005, 02:09:36 PM »

well... I am sure that you guys don't want to get caught looking like hysterical little girls with an agenda.... again...

lazs

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #183 on:** July 14, 2005, 02:25:44 PM »

ya ya.. hysterical little girls... that sums up the post made here.. lmao.. I mean really with everyone going on and on about how the world is going to end.

riiiiighhhttt

Back to my question. As I cannot find anything in this thread that disputes KR leaking the info (only dispute i see is if it was illegal).. What will our dear leader do??

A. Will he keep his word and fire rove??

or

B. Will KR receive some sort of National award such as the medal of freedom??

or

C. Will KR be nominated for the supreme court??

or

D. All parties involved in the investigation be totally discredited and the white house just turn this into another summer political scandle that never sees light?

Nash · « **Reply #184 on:** July 14, 2005, 02:27:48 PM »

Yeah, the Judges have granted the prosecutor everything he's asked for because there's absolutely nothing there, and it's just hysterical girls with an agenda. And that's why a reporter is sitting in jail, because there's absolutely nothing there, and it's just hysterical girls with an agenda. And that's why the CIA referred this case for criminal investigation in the first place, because there's absolutely nothing there, and it's just hysterical girls with an agenda.

Yeah lazs. There's absolutely nothing going on. Just hysterical girls with an agenda.

lazs2 · « **Reply #185 on:** July 14, 2005, 02:31:37 PM »

Now see... there you guys go getting all hysterical.

If there is something wrong we will get to it... I just find it funny that some of you are so willing to step on your own pee pee's.

I can still recall how you insisted that the guard memo was genuine.

lazs

Nash · « **Reply #186 on:** July 14, 2005, 02:36:59 PM »

Well, I aint hysterical. I do have a big-arsed grin on my face though.

Biggest bunch of crooks I have ever seen. This is hella fun to watch.

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #187 on:** July 14, 2005, 02:38:24 PM »

lol I like your definition of hysterical.. What is your definition of plaid?

I was not wrong about the guard memo myself.. So, not sure why you would say guys.. But hey, if it makes you feel better.. 8)

Shamus · « **Reply #188 on:** July 14, 2005, 02:58:56 PM »

AWW shaddupp Doc, yur wrecking my hysterical moment.

shamus

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #189 on:** July 14, 2005, 03:03:22 PM »

lmao

I'sir!

DrDea · « **Reply #190 on:** July 14, 2005, 03:34:23 PM »

Blow it out your hysterical pie hole Shamus.

Nash · « **Reply #191 on:** July 14, 2005, 04:52:24 PM »

lmao.... Harry Reid just introduced an amendment to the Homeland Security thingamajig that would take away security clearance for anyone who discloses the identity of a covert CIA agent. There's a 90 minute debate live right now on CSPAN then a vote.

[edited out potentially inflammitory sentence. Lets just say I think it's funny.

]

DrDea · « **Reply #192 on:** July 14, 2005, 05:02:51 PM »

For those foaming at the mouth about how she was a "covert" agent,guess what.Shes been covertly sitting behind a DESK for the past 6 years.

Now that just caps it for me.

Raider179 · « **Reply #193 on:** July 14, 2005, 05:09:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by DrDea
For those foaming at the mouth about how she was a "covert" agent,guess what.Shes been covertly sitting behind a DESK for the past 6 years.
Now that just caps it for me.

1) you do realize that this happened 2 years ago right? So that is only 4 behind a desk and I guess it doesnt matter either if anyone she worked with in the past now might be exposed as having worked with her.

Chairboy · « **Reply #194 on:** July 14, 2005, 05:30:50 PM »

I find it troubling that some of you seem to be trying to downplay her role as a covert agent.

Let's say she's been behind a desk for 3 years, does that mean that she would never be in the field again? By blowing her cover, her usefulness as an in-field asset has been removed.

What about people who have worked with her? Let's say person A is an agent who meets with person B in some country, and person B is a mole that is giving person A info. Person A is unmasked as an agent a couple years later, so some enterprising security agent of said country decides to run some credit card receipts or go over some old records, and suddenly, lo and behold, sees the connection between person B and person A.

End result, people can die because of this stuff.

Did it happen here? I don't know.

Finally, y'all should have the same reaction to the unmasking of an agent without regard to whether it was a democrat, republican, or martian that did it. I feel that some of the people responding would not do so the same way if it was, say, Senator Kennedy. This is not a republibasher sentiment, I think there are some liberal folks that might be chomping at the bit more then usual, but I also think some of you conservative types are being... uncharacteristically unconcerned.

Ideally, this should not be a partisan issue, it should be a 'protection of the nation' one that goes beyond political one-upsmanship.