Author Topic: Bring on the Spitfires! (Read 2624 times)

Wadke · « **Reply #15 on:** July 21, 2005, 09:31:25 AM »

Blue Planes and Spitfires

killnu · « **Reply #16 on:** July 21, 2005, 09:40:00 AM »

a6m's and la's need redone next...

Stang · « **Reply #17 on:** July 21, 2005, 09:40:17 AM »

Masherbrum · « **Reply #18 on:** July 21, 2005, 09:41:21 AM »

PBY Catalina, D. 520 and the IAR8 is all that is needed.

Maybe the Swordfish.

Karaya

AWRaid · « **Reply #19 on:** July 21, 2005, 09:55:19 AM »

I think the more popular planes should be redone first. Then move on to the lesser used planes.

What about adding the 109 k4?

Also whats wrong with the Spit V? It was recognised as the best all around spit there is. Later models are faster but as everyone knows...with speed comes a wider turn.

With the size of maps, I'd like to see aircraft fuel more in line with their real life flight times.

Spits and 109s alike would benefit from this.

Karnak · « **Reply #20 on:** July 21, 2005, 10:03:51 AM »

AWRaid,

Our Bf109G-10 is a Bf109K-4 in all but name.

Generally the Spitfire Mk LF.Mk IX got the nod as the best all round Spitfire. The Spitfire LF.Mk VIII might have beat it for that if it had been more common.

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #21 on:** July 21, 2005, 10:36:45 AM »

Stang, I'd wet myself if I saw a P40n.

Mitsu · « **Reply #22 on:** July 21, 2005, 10:37:42 AM »

and the N1K2-J and A6Ms, Ki-61s!!! droooool

Skydancer · « **Reply #23 on:** July 21, 2005, 01:10:45 PM »

mitsui no no no don't you know Only US planes should be done! Says so in here:rolleyes:

Guppy35 · « **Reply #24 on:** July 21, 2005, 01:24:27 PM »

Coulda swore much of the remodeling was being done with TOD in mind.

Seems like that puts the ETO birds up first doesn't it?

So Spits and 109s make sense since the 190s, 51s, Jugs and 38s have been done.

B17, B26, Ju88(Maybe a solid nose nightfighter variant as seen by the daylight bombers on occasion) and the Me110 would be on the list, with the 262 and 163 at some point.

Tempest, Mossie and Tiffie too?

Dan/CorkyJr

SELECTOR · « **Reply #25 on:** July 21, 2005, 02:32:24 PM »

i think the spit line up we have at the moment is fine. maybe a mk7 or mk 8 to fill a gap..
what is really needed is the wing type options. clipped, gun lay out. also engine boosts need to be fixed.
as far as 109s go they are pretty well spread for the duration.. only thing i would fix is the bracing around the cockpit..

Karnak · « **Reply #26 on:** July 21, 2005, 02:39:44 PM »

SELECTOR,

So having:

1939: Spitfire Mk Ia (+6lbs boost, saw no combat)
1940:
1941:
1942: Spitfire Mk Vc (+16lbs boost), Spitfire F.Mk IXc (Merlin 61, only 300 built, +15lbs boost), Seafire Mk IIc (+16lbs boost, less than 300 built)
1943:
1944: Spitfire F.Mk XIV (+18lbs boost, fails to match historical climb rates and is highly perked)
1945:

is fine?

Why would you want a Spit VII? It was practically nonexistant.

SuperDud · « **Reply #27 on:** July 21, 2005, 03:27:58 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Skydancer
mitsui no no no don't you know Only US planes should be done!

Ya see, Skydancer knows what he's talking about!

Skydancer · « **Reply #28 on:** July 21, 2005, 04:12:13 PM »

SuperDud · « **Reply #29 on:** July 21, 2005, 04:54:38 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Skydancer

I don't get it? One second your saying we should redo the F4U line and the next you're giving the eye roll? Are you just being sarcastic???