Author Topic: Windows Vista to arrive @ 2006 (Read 1567 times)

Gunslinger · « **Reply #15 on:** July 24, 2005, 02:46:16 PM »

hey if you guys don't like MS there's allways Apple/Mac

last time I checked they were still in business and still making computers.

Nilsen · « **Reply #16 on:** July 24, 2005, 02:51:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
hey if you guys don't like MS there's allways Apple/Mac last time I checked they were still in business and still making computers.

I use both. I know ill open a can of worms if i say that OSX is better so i wont.

Vorticon?

Skuzzy · « **Reply #17 on:** July 24, 2005, 03:08:50 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sixpence
Because the republicans allow microsoft to be a monopoly, there is no competition, so XP will slowly be made useless and you will have to upgrade.

If MS were a phone company they would have been broken up a long time ago

You are way off base on this. It's not Microsoft's fault at all. It's the end user who is to blame for this.

Try putting together a business plan and get it funded to compete against Microsoft. Talk about an exercise in futility.

It has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with business. Corporate, end-users, and developers have spoken. And they are then ones who put Microsoft where Microsoft is.

Politicians have doodly-poop to say about this.

vorticon · « **Reply #18 on:** July 24, 2005, 03:42:25 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
hey if you guys don't like MS there's allways Apple/Mac last time I checked they were still in business and still making computers.

problem is, apple computers patronize the masses, microsoft panders to them.

"Vorticon?"

just because OSX comes with "witchcraft for the vikings" ...

Nilsen · « **Reply #19 on:** July 24, 2005, 03:45:47 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by vorticon
problem is, apple computers patronize the masses, microsoft panders to them.

"Vorticon?"

just because OSX comes with "witchcraft for the vikings" ...

1K3 · « **Reply #20 on:** July 24, 2005, 11:05:25 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Skuzzy
So far, the base requirement is 1GB of RAM for the OS.

Suggestions for the optimal amount of memory runs around 4GB. Microsoft fully expects systems to have have around 8GB of RAM in the next couple or years and they intend on using it.

WTF man, you're making our current PCs look like AMIGA or ATARI!:mad:

Masherbrum · « **Reply #21 on:** July 25, 2005, 12:35:54 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
EDIT: Nice troll btw.

ahh yes it is the Republicans that make you install an MS OS. I bet they held a gun to your head to make you do it too????

It's not like you have freedom of choice to install something else its those big bad evil republicans. How dare Microsoft and Bill Gates for being such viscious ruthless software Giants.

Some liberal senator should just make them pay other companys not to make software at all, then it would be all fair

Dang it Gunslinger, you left out Haliburton AND Abortions!

Karaya

Roscoroo · « **Reply #22 on:** July 25, 2005, 12:54:32 AM »

I should be getting my beta disc next week or so ... Vista is running on 512 ram machines . but it really going postal on the dual type cpu's .

Saintaw · « **Reply #23 on:** July 25, 2005, 02:54:37 AM »

Re: Windows 95 was sooo much better, it was all that was needed.

Cool, so how does that steam engine car of yours work? Has the price of wood gone up as well?

Siaf__csf · « **Reply #24 on:** July 25, 2005, 03:48:03 AM »

The comparison to W95/98 is pretty bad - those OS'es were unstable heaps of trouble. W2k/XP are the first generations that combined the stability of NT with the ease of use seen in W98.

Skuzzy · « **Reply #25 on:** July 25, 2005, 07:17:05 AM »

Beta 1 does not have everything enabled yet Rosco. Beta 2 should have more enabled. Expect RAM requirements to go up with Beta 2 and later.

Edbert1 · « **Reply #26 on:** July 25, 2005, 07:46:14 AM »

I've run various builds of "Longhorn" and it makes all three versions of XP seem pretty light on comsumption of hardware resources.

SLO · « **Reply #27 on:** July 25, 2005, 08:21:57 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nilsen
ROFL lizking

for my use win2k is still the best of what MS has made

Ditto, same for me...

Rolex · « **Reply #28 on:** July 25, 2005, 08:34:07 AM »

I must be doing something wrong. I'm running 98SE and have no problems at all. Never had a virus, worm, trojan, lockup or BSOD.

AHII runs and looks fine @ 1280 x 1024 with 512MB Ram, AMD 2700+, ATI 9800Pro, All USB CH JS, throttle & rudders and no IRQ problems, no services that need to be shut down and never seen a "windows messenger" popup...

What am I missing?

CavPuke · « **Reply #29 on:** July 25, 2005, 11:27:47 AM »

Just some food for thought here, the latest edition of Maximum PC had an editorial suggesting that with the switch to Intel processors by Apple this may be the beginning of a new OS war with Apple trying to grab a market share with Mac OS . I've used both OS, neither are perfect and both have their strengths and weakness's, but in the end it would be nice to have some real competition forcing both MS and Apple to bring a better product to us. Not saying that is what will happen, just saying give it a thought.