Author Topic: Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again  (Read 531 times)

Offline Drifter1234

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 202
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« on: July 27, 2005, 10:00:51 PM »
Big chunks of foam off of Shuttle fuel cells again.  Looks like they dodged a big bullet.


Might be last flight of this current program.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=533&e=1&u=/ap/20050728/ap_on_sc/space_shuttle

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2005, 12:17:34 AM »
:eek:

You think after spending $1 billion they could get it right....

But all in all I know alot of people worked there tails off at NASA and this has to be a huge dissapointment to them.  Just getting the job done doesn't really cut it with space flight, it's getting it done perfect.

I read in the AV press today that if bad weather arises the shuttle has a 1 in 5 chance of landing here at Edwards.  I allready have my spot picked out about 100 yards away from the underun of the runway were you can actually hear the flaps and gears actuating.

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2005, 12:50:16 AM »
...and you pray it doesn't come in short.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline Leslie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2212
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2005, 01:44:01 AM »
Any time the astronauts come back alive it is done perfect.  It is a miracle everytime it happens, no matter how much attention to detail is invested.





Les

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline Raider179

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2005, 06:09:27 AM »
Well if the anti-science administration would give NASA more funds instead of more work (Moon and Mars landings) then maybe they could afford to do the work that is forced upon them.

Scrap the shuttle build a new vehicle. Anyone wathching the hookup with the ISS???

Offline Pooh21

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3145
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2005, 06:33:24 AM »
omfg

Sweet Jesus Tap Dancing Christ! Jessica Simpson sings that "top gun" hit take my breath away?

edit: oh I miss my time in europe where such things didn't reach us
Bis endlich der Fiend am Boden liegt.
Bis Bishland bis Bishland bis Bishland wird besiegt!

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2005, 07:51:48 AM »
Why don't they paint the exterior of the shuttle foam like they did originally.  Surely that could add to the bond to help secure the foam, maybe some sort of polymer.

Either way, the shuttle needs to be scrapped and a new vehicle built.
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2005, 09:29:28 AM »
A problem: We're years away from having a replacement (the Crew Exploration Vehicle plus the SDLV  heavy launch vehicle).  What do we do, cut the shuttle and then sit back for 5+ years without any access to space?  That would be asinine.

The shuttle fleet was due for replacement 15 years ago, but mismanagement and politics have prevented that.  That said, there are people willing to go up in it, and work that needs to be done in orbit.

What's really needed is clear and immediate funding for the CEV development, set up commercial contracts for the heavy launch requirement through any vehicle available (either Protons/Ariane V or get a domestic heavy launcher going) as soon as possible.

Use the shuttle as needed until the new vehicle is available, then retire two of the remaining orbiters (keeping one in mothballs in case its neeed).  Five years after that, I want NASA out of the launcher business.  They can provide 'space traffic control' services the way the national airspace system works through their existing infrastructure, but their role with the CEV should transition to a certification role at best, ala the FAA.
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2005, 02:16:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wolfala
http://video.msn.com/video/p.htm?t=1&p=News_Tech&i=3f820a52-a735-4629-a1ba-c921cdf08042&rf=

VIdeo


OMG blame Bush....WTG  :aok Why don't we just not have them do anything at all give them no goals....wouldnt that be great.


Truth is they've spent a BILLION dollars and don't have ANYTHING to show for it.  2+ years of work and effort.....this launch was a failure.

and no just getting the shuttle crew back doesnt make it a perfect mission if it means they took risks.  Risks in space travle or in a vehicle moving 45k MPH.  NASA got lucky that this wasn't a repeat of before.

Get the crew back safely.....good job but the "return to flight" was a complete failure.

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2005, 02:39:01 PM »
ahhh c'mon. craps' been falling of the orbiter and tanks since day one.

now they got a method for repair in orbit. all launches have the juice to get to the station.  

ask the astronauts how they feel about it.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Glasses

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1811
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2005, 03:10:24 PM »
IMHO they need to get rid of the "shuttles" and put in a more  efficient way of launching crafts to space. The technology already exists and if I remember it was  developed under  Willy Clinton , that later Gore or Congress or the MOther of Christ herself  cancelled, they just need the funding to make a fleet of the darned things.

I agree Chairboy they need to stop being the central space program and  start investing in letting companies invest in space travel like the two guys who went into space a couple of months ago :D

Offline rshubert

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1462
Here's a slightly different take
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2005, 03:18:26 PM »
on the problem.  Something I heard on Rush Limbaugh today.

It seems that the first few launches used no foam at all.  They wanted to decrease the boil-off of H2 and O2 from the tanks, so they insulated them with a spray on foam that used freon (gasp) as a component.  This worked well.

Fast forward to the Clinton Administration.  Freon is evil.  Freon must go!  The foam on the shuttle must be reworked to account for the new environmentally-acceptable politically correct world of the Clintons and their left-fringe friends.

This happened about 1995.  In 1997, NASA started noticing a much higher (10-20 times higher) loss rate of tiles on the shuttles, using the new foam on the tank.

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #13 on: July 28, 2005, 03:20:02 PM »
Whatever happened to the USAF NASP? Still black?


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Looks Like Space Shuttle Grounded Again
« Reply #14 on: July 28, 2005, 03:21:05 PM »
Scrap Nasa.

Its all a waste of money now.