Author Topic: Spit Mk1A climbrate (Read 3487 times)

Kev367th · « **Reply #75 on:** August 08, 2005, 11:35:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Wotan
Well the lower octane fuel would detonate so its understandable that boost would be limited if lower octane fuel was used.

You can go down, you can't go up...

You can run lower octane as long as you don't over boost...

However, to get the most out of the engine the engine is set up to run with 150 grade.

Kev it didn't take 1 day, it took 2. The second day for testing...

Quote by me -
My post - "Well it took 1 day to convert a whole squadron from 100 to 150, and 1 day of flight tests, similar time for 87 to 100 maybe? "

My math off or does 1 day conversion and 1 day testing = 2 days?

(bold added by me for purposes of this reply)

Come on Wotan, please read the whole post and not just the one bit you feel you need to jump on (dont commit a Kurfy bud, your better than that).

Wotan · « **Reply #76 on:** August 08, 2005, 11:43:13 PM »

You edited your post after I made mine..

Those times are recorded....

Quote

Last edited by Kev367th on 08-09-2005 at 12:33 AM

My post:

08-09-2005 12:30 AM

Now you are just paying the clown...

Kev367th · « **Reply #77 on:** August 08, 2005, 11:45:35 PM »

Yes I edited my post - because originally I had fugged up the pic link. All I had was a red X instead of a pic. you were probably posting as I was editing, I had to go back to the site and get the link.

The edit was nothing to do with the time taken, you have my word on that.

If I had been wrong I would have just said so, been wrong before and had no qualms about admitting it.

Wotan · « **Reply #78 on:** August 08, 2005, 11:47:42 PM »

BS the pic was there when I posted...

You edited it after I had replied and already had seen the image...

Whatever...

Kev367th · « **Reply #79 on:** August 08, 2005, 11:52:42 PM »

The original post actually mentioned the time taken and I had put

"I know I'm looking for a link to the doc"

Then I went off to find it.
I found the doc linked to it and got red X only. So I then went back again and relinked the doc.

The final edit, which was the 12.33 one was the addition of the explantion of where and when the fuel came from. That wasn't there when you replied.

So in fact there were 4 edits the last one being the fuel shipment and source information.
None of them changed the time taken.

Be a bit dumb to link to a doc that shows 1 day conversion + 1 day testing and say 1 day.
I may be a lot of things, dumb and a liar isn't part of them.

Angus · « **Reply #80 on:** August 09, 2005, 07:55:17 AM »

Whatever you say Wotan, I do not belive in yer theory that
A) 100 oct from 87 was useless.
B) A technical headache anyway.

Maybe mix it with water, huh?

Did you ever change spark plugs in yer life BTW?
(Big technical problem)

MiloMorai · « **Reply #81 on:** August 09, 2005, 08:53:15 AM »

Wotan is just being difficult.

Wotan · « **Reply #82 on:** August 09, 2005, 09:31:02 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Angus
Whatever you say Wotan, I do not belive in yer theory that
A) 100 oct from 87 was useless.
B) A technical headache anyway.

Maybe mix it with water, huh?

Did you ever change spark plugs in yer life BTW?
(Big technical problem)

Besides being a flat out liar now you are just making things up out of thin air...

Quote where I said:

Quote

A) 100 oct from 87 was useless.

and/or

Quote

B) A technical headache anyway.

This thread isnt the only one where you have re-edited post after folks have replied...

ramzey · « **Reply #83 on:** August 09, 2005, 01:26:39 PM »

Kev , reminde me please what was/is your proffesion?

ty

Kev367th · « **Reply #84 on:** August 09, 2005, 10:38:37 PM »

Was an Aircraft Technician for 9 year in the British Army, followd by 3 years in Civil Aviation, now a Computer Network Administrator (last 4 years).

I know big change/difference, was forced on me due to an auto accident.

ramzey · « **Reply #85 on:** August 10, 2005, 10:14:30 AM »

thank you

Angus · « **Reply #86 on:** August 10, 2005, 11:24:57 AM »

Wotan:
"This thread isnt the only one where you have re-edited post after folks have replied..."

I think you are confusing me with someone else?
Anyway, the only times I edid is when I find a typo, and on one occasion, I was a tad to vulgar

But you only need to page up a bit to see what I meen, or well, everyone else has

Wotan · « **Reply #87 on:** August 10, 2005, 06:04:36 PM »

Yup the edit reply was for your buddy Kev...

However, you are a liar as well as can be seen by your made up claims that I said such things as:

Quote

A) 100 oct from 87 was useless.
B) A technical headache anyway.

Since most of you Spit lovers are the same, liars and always distorting what others say, you can understand how some one could make such an error...

Kev the edit king and Angus the guy with the made up 'I heard', 'I think', and when that doesn't work he creates some straw man fallacy by putting words into other people's mouths...

Kev367th · « **Reply #88 on:** August 10, 2005, 06:11:17 PM »

Wotan I've already explained what happend.

The time taken WAS NOT altered.
Your choice if you choose to believe it or not, I know what I added, all the text below the picture.
I wish there was a edit record you'd see how WRONG you are.
In fact if you 'quoted' me as you usually do this whole thing would be mute.

But even then it would be pointless, you and Kurfy are exactly the same, even after he's proved wrong he just keeps on going.
Big difference is I wouldn't take that and say it was a representation of 'most' of the LW community.
Thats a hell of a chip you got on your shoulder, considered consulting a carpenter?

All you did was read the 1st part of the sentence then go off half cocked and make an arse of yourself.

Wotan · « **Reply #89 on:** August 10, 2005, 06:37:37 PM »

You edited your post after I made my reply...

To deny that is lying... The times are noted and can be seen by every one...

You lied and said that you only edited your post because the image wouldn't show, that is a lie as well because your edit wasn't complete until after I made my reply. I saw the image and thats where I read the part where it stated:

May, 8th - Flying was limited to-day to aircraft tests on modified aircraft

I don't how many times you edited your post before but when I read your reply and made my post at 08-09-2005 12:30 AM you made no mention 1 day of testing...

After I made my reply you edited your post at 12:33 and then made a reply at 12:35...

You original post was made at 12:05...

26 min later and after my reply you decide to edit it?

As I said you are a liar to deny it and we both know that...

Quote

But even then it would be pointless, you and Kurfy are exactly the same,

Quote the comparisons? Again you lie...