« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 6 of August, 1965  (Read 328 times)

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
6 of August, 1965
« on: August 05, 2005, 09:03:46 PM »
40 years ago, Voting Rights Act changed America

I would also salute the "forgotten heroes" (or is it:)) who made this possible.
Logged

Offline EagleEyes

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1474
      • http://www.myspace.com/bassim
6 of August, 1965
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2005, 10:59:58 PM »
Can't forget August 6, 1945

Enola Gay dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima.


Thank god nothing like that has happened since Nagasaki!
Logged
Joedog31

GL IV./JG4 for Red Storm Krupp Steel
***The Flying Circus*** MA
334th FS "The Eagles" - FSO

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12793
6 of August, 1965
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2005, 11:28:57 PM »
Heard that on news radio tonight, except the woman referred to it as a "nuclear" bomb instead of "atomic" bomb.  

If it was nuclear, many more people would of been dead
Logged
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline myelo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1590
6 of August, 1965
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2005, 09:07:29 AM »
Why do you think a nuclear fission weapon is not a nuclear weapon?
Logged
myelo
Bastard coated bastard, with a creamy bastard filling

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13920
6 of August, 1965
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2005, 08:04:45 PM »
He thinks that way because the atomic bomb is a nucular weapon not a nuclear one.  :rolleyes:
Logged
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Seraphim

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 527
6 of August, 1965
« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2005, 10:47:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Meatwad
Heard that on news radio tonight, except the woman referred to it as a "nuclear" bomb instead of "atomic" bomb.  

If it was nuclear, many more people would of been dead


Atomic bombs are  nuclear bombs. The original 'atomic' bomb was a simple fission device based on ramming a uranium projectile into a uranium core. Modern 'nuclear' bombs are a little more fancy (and more efficient), but still use uranium or plutonium cores, they are just detonated differently. In my opinion, the media just used 'nuclear' instead  of 'atomic' just to sound more scary (apparently it still works for some people).
Logged

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
6 of August, 1965
« Reply #6 on: August 06, 2005, 11:00:39 PM »
Actually the original was a spherical plutonium implosion device.  The second was a uranium cannon, the third was another plutonium spherical implosion weapon.

The first uranium cannon design was over Hiroshima.  Little Boy was more cylindrical than Fat Man, Fat man being more sperical shaped.  

The plutonium design was more difficult so the need for the Trinity test before sending another to Nagasaki.

But I think the thread was commenting on the 40th anneversary of the 1965 voting rights act, not the destruction of Hiroshima.
Logged
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Seraphim

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 527
6 of August, 1965
« Reply #7 on: August 06, 2005, 11:30:18 PM »
Yes, your right, I was just on the actual 'detonated in aggression' order.....
but yes, having the voting rights was so important.
I just wish we will have a day when there' no more of this '1st black' or '1st woman' or even 1st anything anymore. I like to hear when it's 'the 1st person ' to accomplish something, not race or sex to determine how much news you get.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »