Author Topic: B-29 Super Fortress  (Read 113279 times)

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15872
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1980 on: February 07, 2010, 07:14:06 PM »
234 VS 262?  hummm.  I would pick the 262. 
I'm currently 1-1 vs a 262 lifetime in the 234.
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1981 on: February 07, 2010, 07:16:02 PM »
I'm currently 1-1 vs a 262 lifetime in the 234.
(Image removed from quote.)

HAHA, yea i saw that pic a while back.  now go 1 vs 1 with him in a fighter plane and see how he fly it.  most impressive for a 262/ 
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15872
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1982 on: February 07, 2010, 07:18:37 PM »
HAHA, yea i saw that pic a while back.  now go 1 vs 1 with him in a fighter plane and see how he fly it.  most impressive for a 262/ 
Oh I agree with you there, wasn't trying to argue he woudn't fight. But the general population will sit on their perch. I even had Grizz approach me on how to fly the 234, I felt honored. :P
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1983 on: February 07, 2010, 08:03:57 PM »
Oh I agree with you there, wasn't trying to argue he woudn't fight. But the general population will sit on their perch. I even had Grizz approach me on how to fly the 234, I felt honored. :P

lol, him approaching you for help.  that is a bit surprise.  i guess even the best need help on how to flt something. 
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline jay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1984 on: February 07, 2010, 09:30:41 PM »
how do you aim the guns on the back of a 234?
"He who makes a beast of himself Gets rid of the pain of being a man." Dr.Johnson


Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1985 on: February 07, 2010, 09:49:35 PM »
how do you aim the guns on the back of a 234?

F3
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1986 on: February 08, 2010, 02:53:20 PM »
mmmhmmm...yeah...sure.

Tell me, why haven't you ever used the Ju-88, Stuka or Ki-67? Too slow, too vulnerable maybe not enough payload to do any good in one shot? Beefcake is the same way...as a matter of fact, neither has the OP of this thread.

I'm betting aside from the "cool factor"...those who are wanting the B-29 want to be able to do high alt milk runs and drop a base or town in a single run...nothing more.

gyrene do you know what my favorite plane to fly in AH is? The B25C. And I only fly it in the Late War Arena. I usually die in it but I like the challenge of trying to make through enemy lines to drop on a contested base. The B25C is rather slow, has a tiny bomb load, and has the poorest reward defense of any medium bomber in the game, yet it's my favorite to fly.

Secondly I don't milk run in this game. Ask around. I'm the type of buff pilot who likes to fly and test his gunnery skills. I could care less about bombing, in fact many times I just go and bomb the runway at an enemy base with the hopes of getting a few planes to up and intercept me. To me the thrill of combat is facing a pilot who KNOWS how to kill buffs and getting test my gunnery against their tactics. This is even made more fun by doing it in a B25.  :D

At this point I really don't care if the B29 was added to the game or not. However, I do wish us buff pilots could get a new ride. An He-111 would be quite fun right now and would be a nice change from my B25. But I'd be happy with anything.
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1987 on: February 08, 2010, 03:09:35 PM »
gyrene do you know what my favorite plane to fly in AH is? The B25C. And I only fly it in the Late War Arena. I usually die in it but I like the challenge of trying to make through enemy lines to drop on a contested base. The B25C is rather slow, has a tiny bomb load, and has the poorest reward defense of any medium bomber in the game, yet it's my favorite to fly.

Secondly I don't milk run in this game. Ask around. I'm the type of buff pilot who likes to fly and test his gunnery skills. I could care less about bombing, in fact many times I just go and bomb the runway at an enemy base with the hopes of getting a few planes to up and intercept me. To me the thrill of combat is facing a pilot who KNOWS how to kill buffs and getting test my gunnery against their tactics. This is even made more fun by doing it in a B25.  :D
Wait...  :headscratch:

Here I was thinking your favorite bomber was the B-17...all your stats seem to point in that direction...at least you've gotten killed in it more than the other bombers (on average).

I always thought the B-17 was the coolest bomber of WWII...anything nicknamed "flying fortress" with as many stories as that plane was just too cool.

And I think it's better looking than the B-29...



Compared to this?



B-17 all the way

jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1988 on: February 08, 2010, 03:15:18 PM »
The B17 is the plane I fly the most, and it's my second favorite plane, but the B25 is my pride and joy. I will admit I don't fly the B25 into areas where I KNOW I'm going to get slaughtered so that's why I fly the B17 far more often.

Edit: And yes I agree, the B17 is far sexier than the B29. ;)
« Last Edit: February 08, 2010, 03:18:43 PM by Beefcake »
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1989 on: February 08, 2010, 03:22:09 PM »
Wait...  :headscratch:

Here I was thinking your favorite bomber was the B-17...all your stats seem to point in that direction...at least you've gotten killed in it more than the other bombers (on average).

I always thought the B-17 was the coolest bomber of WWII...anything nicknamed "flying fortress" with as many stories as that plane was just too cool.

And I think it's better looking than the B-29...

(Image removed from quote.)

Compared to this?

(Image removed from quote.)

B-17 all the way




You do not think name "Superfortress" is cool?  i kind like the name of both bombers and the "Dominator".  There is something funny looking about the B-32.  Not sure if it is the nose or the huge tail it has. 
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1990 on: February 08, 2010, 03:43:23 PM »

You do not think name "Superfortress" is cool?  i kind like the name of both bombers and the "Dominator".  There is something funny looking about the B-32.  Not sure if it is the nose or the huge tail it has. 
The name is cool but...look at that picture, take the wings and tail section off and what do you have? hint - starts with a d and ends with an o The B-17 just looks like it's made for any trouble it can get into.


You're right there is something funny looking about the B-32...


Almost looks like they took the B-25 body...stuck B-24 wings on it...then added the B-29 tail section to it...geez what a frankenstein.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1991 on: February 08, 2010, 03:48:21 PM »
The name is cool but...look at that picture, take the wings and tail section off and what do you have? hint - starts with a d and ends with an o The B-17 just looks like it's made for any trouble it can get into.


You're right there is something funny looking about the B-32...
(Image removed from quote.)

Almost looks like they took the B-25 body...stuck B-24 wings on it...then added the B-29 tail section to it...geez what a frankenstein.

lol

I see more of a B-26 fuselage, B-17 nose, b-24 wing and b-29 tail.  But in all it is a funny looking bomber.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1992 on: February 08, 2010, 07:13:02 PM »
Well I see a B-26 fuselage and nose (single gun, first thing I noticed, and it has the same type of framing on it too), wings halfway between a B-17 and a B-24, and an elongated B-29 tail.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1993 on: February 08, 2010, 07:33:40 PM »


Almost looks like they took the B-25 body...stuck B-24 wings on it...then added the B-29 tail section to it...geez what a frankenstein.

When originally designed and the first prototypes built, the B-32 looked like a larger B-24.  It even had similiar twin tails but stability problems caused the twin tails to be changed with the B-29 tail.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1994 on: February 09, 2010, 09:41:55 AM »
When originally designed and the first prototypes built, the B-32 looked like a larger B-24.  It even had similiar twin tails but stability problems caused the twin tails to be changed with the B-29 tail.


ack-ack


Really, i did not know that.  Thank god they change it.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group