Author Topic: B-29 Super Fortress  (Read 96842 times)

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #285 on: February 06, 2008, 10:14:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk
Can't believe I have to do this.

We don't do it so you have a reason to stay.:D
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline MotleyCH

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 633
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #286 on: February 06, 2008, 11:08:00 AM »
I still think this photo is funny as well:rofl  


Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10166
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #287 on: February 06, 2008, 11:14:24 AM »
I have no problem with the addition of the B-29.  Heavy perk the hell out of it though.  An absolute, unwavering, without doubt, unforgiving, unrelenting, non-stop, never-say-die, super huge NO to the nuke.  It is just not needed in this game.

Oink
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #288 on: February 06, 2008, 01:23:52 PM »
Yep, that picture is funny.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #289 on: February 06, 2008, 03:17:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Denholm
We don't do it so you have a reason to stay.:D

Pfftt, you'd think collision whines would be enough. ;)
See Rule #4

Offline captain1ma

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14388
      • JG54 website
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #290 on: February 06, 2008, 03:40:35 PM »
i dont have a problem with the nuke, as long as you allow the Axis side to perfect and bomb, the ever-living daylights out of the Allied side with V-1 and V-2 rockets.

We already have our heavy water plants set up and our atomic development crew is on standby with enriched uranium.

 As an American citizen with German heritage.... ok i was born in nuremburg, i would be totally offended if a nuke is given without the V-1 and V-2 program in full Swing in AVA!!!

make sure you also send small pox infected blankets to the american indians and dont forget to slaughter the sheep from passing trains too.

This Public Service announcement has be brought to you by JG54

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #291 on: February 06, 2008, 04:05:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by captain1ma
i dont have a problem with the nuke, as long as you allow the Axis side to perfect and bomb, the ever-living daylights out of the Allied side with V-1 and V-2 rockets.

We already have our heavy water plants set up and our atomic development crew is on standby with enriched uranium.

 As an American citizen with German heritage.... ok i was born in nuremburg, i would be totally offended if a nuke is given without the V-1 and V-2 program in full Swing in AVA!!!

make sure you also send small pox infected blankets to the american indians and dont forget to slaughter the sheep from passing trains too.

This Public Service announcement has be brought to you by JG54


Oh god, please, next time, read through all of the other posts' first...

Offline JETBLST

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 206
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #292 on: February 06, 2008, 08:28:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hap
B29, yes!  Nuke, no!  Make 25K min alt for bomb bays to open or some such similar arrangement.


I really like this.  There are folks who do like to bomb.  Strat bombing was just a little part of the war.  Fighters did mostly things like accompany bombers not furball with unlimited uppers.:D

The high alt would also make more use of the 163 and 262.

The nuke thing did happen in WWII and for good reason!  At least one of my two uncles came home after the war thanks to the bomb.  However since it was only dropped twice, it would be unrealistic to have nukes going off all over the place in Aces.  THINK OF THE GLOBAL WARMING EFFECTS TOO:rofl

Offline JETBLST

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 206
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #293 on: February 06, 2008, 08:35:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bustr
Make B29 maps where they launch from islands six sectors from the mainland and missions take TIME to get over the IP. Make their only load GP bombs. By the way Curtis LeMay ordered missions to drop from 12k because of the winds at alt scattering the bombs.


EXCELLENT POINT.  But really, dont you think we need jdams in a WWII based game?  :rofl

Offline Gowan

  • Proation 9/22/2016
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 589
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #294 on: February 06, 2008, 09:38:34 PM »
im scared im only the 3rd to do this...


« Last Edit: February 06, 2008, 09:42:50 PM by Gowan »

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #295 on: February 07, 2008, 09:28:33 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by captain1ma
...As an American citizen with German heritage.... ok i was born in nuremburg, i would be totally offended if a nuke is given without the V-1 and V-2 program in full Swing in AVA!!!...

No nuke is ever going to show up, therefore forget about your V1 or V2. Hitech already said, no bombs over 2 tons.

P.S. Are you proud of your Lufthansa A340-211 Nuremberg (D-AIBA)?:D
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline derkojote23

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 95
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #296 on: February 07, 2008, 01:53:29 PM »
Yes you are nuts. That would sorta make base taking a mute point. Some one would get mad and BOOM we would need a new map to play on as no one would be able to up with the RADs we would take. we would all die faster then HTC could change the maps LOL you would give the server a melt down.:rofl

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #297 on: February 07, 2008, 02:05:11 PM »
Refer to this as to what happens AFTER the nuke is dropped:



Can you guess, or do I have to tell you?:)
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #298 on: February 07, 2008, 05:57:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SkyRock
only two were dropped in wartime, and that choice is still being debated, yet peeps want to add it to a dogfighting game.:rolleyes:


Ya know, we could solve any number of problems with a single solution.  The Douglas MB-1/AIR-2 Genie.

1. Huge bomber formations.  Gone.
2. Huge furballs.  Gone.
3. Skyrock.  Gone.
4. Cherry pickers.  Gone.
5. Marauding CVs.  Gone.
6. Skyrock.  Well...you get the idea.
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline JETBLST

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 206
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #299 on: February 07, 2008, 10:36:41 PM »
Havent been on BBS here for a while (Except for this last week)

As long as we are talking Nooks and B29s.  How long has it been since the Subs Discussions have gone around?

I thought Sub Battles with the CVs was a cool idea.