Author Topic: B-29 Super Fortress  (Read 114892 times)

Offline JunkyII

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8428
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #555 on: June 20, 2008, 02:38:30 PM »
I would like a B29 with those girls in it :D
DFC Member
Proud Member of Pigs on the Wing
"Yikes"

Offline spit16nooby

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #556 on: June 20, 2008, 02:40:42 PM »
I'm pretty sure the b-32 was made as a backup incase the b-29 didnt work

Offline Rambo Fan

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 182
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #557 on: June 21, 2008, 01:03:11 AM »
Well if you read quite clearly (EVERYTHING THAT IS ABOUT TO BE TOLLED IS JUST A FRIENDLY GUESS, NO NEED TO MURDER.) the B-32 was an alien monkey, who flew with about 3000mph and had missiles, was weak in the groins. Was originally called the FLYING MONKEY, can hold 50,000lb worth of tissues and 200,000lb worth of diapers.

So really, please read your history before you post it.  :D

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #558 on: June 21, 2008, 09:47:18 AM »
How about its not time to add the B29.  :noid
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline Rambo Fan

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 182
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #559 on: June 21, 2008, 07:06:19 PM »
How about its not time to add the B29.  :noid
Im not IN with your idea. :cry

Offline Pannono

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #560 on: June 26, 2008, 01:05:29 AM »
You know, every time someone asks for a B-29, it makes God so angry he allows another Ben Stiller movie to be made.

 :rofl  :rofl :rofl :rofl
Pannono
Proud Member of Pigs On The Wing
8 Player H2H: 2006-07
MA Tours: 87, 97-113, 143-144, 160-Present
FSO: JG54

Offline AAolds

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 442
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #561 on: June 26, 2008, 01:10:55 AM »
Im all for adding the B29 (no nukes).  Put a perk cost on it of 300ish at even ENY level.

Add the the 22,000 lbs Tallboys too.

Thx.
The AArch AAngelz is its own country, we owe loyalty only unto ourselves and those we fly with at the moment.---AAolds AArch AAngelz XO.

I love to GV and do Jabo missions vs GVs, get used to it.  Being good at one helps in the other.

Offline slimmer

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 272
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #562 on: June 26, 2008, 03:22:24 AM »
 :aokyes
Member: Hot Soup Mafia -chokin chickin noodle
 Army of Muppets

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #563 on: June 26, 2008, 04:02:27 AM »
what about NOT adding the B29 ? Enough american bombers. I don't know why all the noobs want it, as they won't even have the perks for it  :D
now posting as SirNuke

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #564 on: June 26, 2008, 05:26:12 AM »
If anything HTC should focus on 1940-43 bombers and fighters.
Give more plane choices to fly, to give the perked rides even more meaning and ubberness.

Also to teach you knuckle heads a little thing called "limitations"



-ZOMG..mah 41 plane is not teh ubbarzors!!eleven!oneoneone1 1 1"
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."

Offline dirtdart

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1847
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #565 on: June 26, 2008, 12:16:11 PM »
B-29, what planes could catch them when they get to their operational altitude?  I like the 1940-43 post comment.  I would love to see the German bomber B planes, the Ju-288, He-177, and the Me-264.  They never were truly "operational", but they would at least give us an axis sorta heavy bomber.  Personally my money is on the Ju-288, just because it was so wicked fast. 
If you are not GFC...you are wee!
Put on your boots boots boots...and parachutes..chutes...chutes.. .
Illigitimus non carborundum

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #566 on: June 26, 2008, 12:35:38 PM »
Im not IN with your idea. :cry
thank you for your interesting comment. :D
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline Redlegs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1151
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #567 on: June 26, 2008, 01:39:21 PM »
Oh man one more B29 request thread and Hitech might actually listen.
Resident Arizona Cardinals/Cincinnati Reds fan

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #568 on: June 26, 2008, 02:59:22 PM »
add the b29 and FW200  :pray
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #569 on: June 26, 2008, 04:42:54 PM »
add the b29 and FW200  :pray
FW200 is fine
B29 NEVER!
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."