Author Topic: B-29 Super Fortress  (Read 115003 times)

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #600 on: July 31, 2008, 04:24:00 PM »
Again, a nuclear bomb is out of the question, and HTC has already stated that by implementing a rule of no bombs over 4,000 pounds.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline TheMan

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 133
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #601 on: July 31, 2008, 04:25:10 PM »
Again, a nuclear bomb is out of the question, and HTC has already stated that by implementing a rule of no bombs over 4,000 pounds.
Well thats dumb , because this game is about world war 2 simulation and we had 22,000 pound lanc bombs and we had the atom bomb.

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #602 on: July 31, 2008, 04:29:53 PM »
On the contrary. If you think this game will have everything ever used in WWII you are sadly mistaken. Just think about it, if we added every plane and every weapon ever used in WWII, HTC would lose a lot of business from veterans of the game. Considering that now a lot of the original aircraft this game started out with are obsolete and wars are being won in just minutes. There is no joy in this and therefore veteran players will move elsewhere.

HTC is smart and therefore will only add aircraft, water vessels, vehicles, and weapons that will further enhance the need of strategy instead of enhancing the suicidal spirit which thrives amongst most of our Lancaster pilots.

With that in mind, go out there and find something not requested which will contribute to the game's strategical spirits.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline botkins

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #603 on: July 31, 2008, 04:30:24 PM »
That is absolutely ridiculous. If we got te b29 the war wouldnt get won in 3 minutes. Its 1 nuke , not that big
he said a perked formation with all of them carring nooks plus more then 1 person would be up at
one time with a b29 w/ nukes
Failure is a result of Laziness

Offline TheMan

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 133
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #604 on: July 31, 2008, 04:34:32 PM »
On the contrary. If you think this game will have everything ever used in WWII you are sadly mistaken. Just think about it, if we added every plane and every weapon ever used in WWII, HTC would lose a lot of business from veterans of the game. Considering that now a lot of the original aircraft this game started out with are obsolete and wars are being won in just minutes. There is no joy in this and therefore veteran players will move elsewhere.

HTC is smart and therefore will only add aircraft, water vessels, vehicles, and weapons that will further enhance the need of strategy instead of enhancing the suicidal spirit which thrives amongst most of our Lancaster pilots.

With that in mind, go out there and find something not requested which will contribute to the game's strategical spirits.
Aahahahahah wars are being won in minutes , are you smokeing something. Weve had the same map in orange and blue for over 3 weeks now , and I never said every plane , i said the planes that were used most. We have 163s which really wernt even used at all but we dont hae a b29 WHICH FINISHED THE WAS~~~!!!!

Offline TheMan

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 133
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #605 on: July 31, 2008, 04:36:19 PM »
he said a perked formation with all of them carring nooks plus more then 1 person would be up at
one time with a b29 w/ nukes
The Nukes blast rate would determine everything , I think 1 Nuke should be anle to kill a town ::) or a portion of it.

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #606 on: July 31, 2008, 04:38:57 PM »
The bomb was used three times. Once to test its abilities, Once to bomb Nagasaki, and once to bomb Hiroshima. You think something used three times should be in this game?
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6554
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #607 on: July 31, 2008, 04:39:56 PM »
he said a perked formation with all of them carring nooks plus more then 1 person would be up at
one time with a b29 w/ nukes

Picture a Joker's NOE raid with formations of Enola Gays and Bock's Cars bombing HQ every night.  :rofl
Snuggie - voted "Sexiest Man Alive" for the entire Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere!

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #608 on: July 31, 2008, 04:41:09 PM »
And the whines of people complaining that they were killed by their own bombs.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline stodd

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #609 on: July 31, 2008, 04:43:41 PM »
 :rofl :rofl stop arguing with denholm and use the search function. Mabey you should play the game more then a week before drastically trying to change it.
Stodd/ CandyMan
I don't get why you even typed that, you know it's stupid.


Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #610 on: July 31, 2008, 04:47:40 PM »
I believe he has been around before. He mentioned in another topic that HTC, "took away my animated water."

That was a while back, obviously he's been here before.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Ciaphas

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1955
      • DethKlokDave
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #611 on: July 31, 2008, 04:48:20 PM »
You don't have to be carrying an Atomic Bomb to experience the B-29's brilliance. With it's payload and defenses it will always be one of the better bombers to have ever flown. It would be nice to have another 'eavy bomber in the game but the A-Bomb should not be included. Think about it this way, if they added our (USA) secret weapon then they will need to start adding secret weapons from all of the countries. and that would be a large waiste of resources.

B-29 defense and Payload
Guns:

8 to 10× .50 in (12.7 mm) caliber Browning M2/ANs in remote controlled turrets
2 x .50 in and 1× 20 mm M2 cannon in tail position (the cannon was eventually removed as it proved unreliable in service )

B-29B-BW - All armament and sighting equipment removed except for tail position; initially 2 x .50 in M2/AN and 1× 20 mm M2 cannon, later 3 x 2 x .50 in M2/AN with APG-15 gun-laying radar fitted as standard.

PayLoad:

Bombs: 20,000 lb (9,000 kg) standard loadout, could be modified to externally carry two 22,000 lb (10,000 kg) T-14 "Earthquake" bombs

!S!
Ciaphas
10.(Jabo)/JG 26 Nuisance Raids Scenario


Offline botkins

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #612 on: July 31, 2008, 04:49:07 PM »
The bomb was used three times. Once to test its abilities, Once to bomb Nagasaki, and once to bomb Hiroshima. You think something used three times should be in this game?
i never said that thats what he said
Failure is a result of Laziness

Offline botkins

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #613 on: July 31, 2008, 04:51:35 PM »
Picture a Joker's NOE raid with formations of Enola Gays and Bock's Cars bombing HQ every night.  :rofl
it wouldent be sucessful at least if they lost their cheat guide without it they couldent figure
out how to even fly a b29.
Failure is a result of Laziness

Offline halo342

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 245
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #614 on: July 31, 2008, 05:14:47 PM »
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,53268.0.html

take a look at when this was posted, that's how far the B-29 requests go back
« Last Edit: July 31, 2008, 07:14:59 PM by halo342 »
Oh my God, what has the Internet evolved itself into? :huh