« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 ... 172   Go Down

Author Topic: B-29 Super Fortress  (Read 115381 times)

Offline hodag

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #750 on: October 30, 2008, 08:06:33 PM »
Why must it be a crime NOT to run a search. Just because an issue has been discussed doesn't mean it must be dropped.
If B-29 posts annoy you here's a fresh way to look at it...DON'T READ THEM!!!!
As far as this being a dead horse, no offense taken. Obviously I'm not the first, nor the last.
I actually prefer behind the playground AFTER school. I don't need another detention.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2008, 08:08:36 PM by hodag »
Logged

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #751 on: October 30, 2008, 08:06:59 PM »
Logged
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #752 on: October 30, 2008, 08:09:33 PM »
Quote from: hodag on October 30, 2008, 08:06:33 PM
Why must it be a crime NOT to run a search. Just because an issue has been discussed doesn't mean it must be dropped.
If B-29 posts annoy you here's a fresh way to look at it...DON'T READ THEM!!!!
As far as this being a dead horse, no offense taken. Obviously I'm not the first, nor the last.
Funny, I thought there was a post about this last week. Seriously bud, from an outsider coming in, use the search key, it realy save us a lot of ridiculos flames, such as this post is, and is going to now.
<S>
Logged
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #753 on: October 30, 2008, 08:23:46 PM »
Logged
See Rule #4

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #754 on: October 30, 2008, 08:42:52 PM »
How many B-29 threads been made so far?
Logged
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #755 on: October 30, 2008, 10:00:58 PM »
Quote from: Bronk on October 30, 2008, 08:23:46 PM
:rofl :rofl
you had your chance  :P

I was "refusing to post it".   The guy is obviously a shades, first clue was the first post.   He's wanting to say more, but shows restraint.   It is further magnified in his "Stroker" reply.   
Logged
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline opposum

  • Probation
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 467
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #756 on: October 30, 2008, 10:13:32 PM »
WOOT!!1!1!!!

No0Kz!111!!!

yEz!!1
Logged
/_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #757 on: October 31, 2008, 02:20:51 AM »
Okay I have given it a lot of thought and after considerable BEER I think its still up to Hitech. But if he does give us the B29 then maybe he will also consider giving us the one and only great killer of the B29...

(drum roll please)



and of course then we could also get the great Mig Killer...

(another drum roll please)



but OOPS now we are fighting the Korean war...

Nothing says end the second WW better then the B29.  :aok

Logged
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #758 on: October 31, 2008, 05:51:02 AM »
Gee and here I was thinking the B-29 flew 20,000 sorties during WW-ll and dropped 180,000 tons of bombs on Japan and Japanese forces. Had I known it was a Korean war aircraft I never would have asked for it.
Logged
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #759 on: October 31, 2008, 08:15:36 AM »
a B29 doesn't fit in the bomber hangar, and it can't take off from our runways.

Not to mention the WWII version was really imprecise and had to be used from mid alts to hit anything. (I feel stupid repeating this for the Nth time)
Logged
now posting as SirNuke

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #760 on: October 31, 2008, 09:01:35 AM »
Quote from: Bronk on October 30, 2008, 07:57:14 PM
Sorry has to be done.

(Image removed from quote.)
Dang! I can't believe I missed this.
Logged
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #761 on: October 31, 2008, 01:17:28 PM »
The B29 flew in only one theater (against Japan) but the rumor is that at the convention a 'fantasy 1946' arena was mentioned. By 1946 both Germany and Japan were surrendered so its anyones guess what direction the 'fantasy' would go in.
Logged
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10471
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #762 on: October 31, 2008, 01:36:41 PM »
Quote from: Chalenge on October 31, 2008, 01:17:28 PM
The B29 flew in only one theater (against Japan) but the rumor is that at the convention a 'fantasy 1946' arena was mentioned. By 1946 both Germany and Japan were surrendered so its anyones guess what direction the 'fantasy' would go in.


 Ho 229....



                         :noid
Logged

Offline bc21

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 254
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #763 on: October 31, 2008, 01:51:31 PM »
I think a B29 would be good just no nuks
Logged

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #764 on: October 31, 2008, 02:09:13 PM »
Quote from: Noir on October 31, 2008, 08:15:36 AM
a B29 doesn't fit in the bomber hangar, and it can't take off from our runways.

Not to mention the WWII version was really imprecise and had to be used from mid alts to hit anything. (I feel stupid repeating this for the Nth time)

Solution:  designate the b29 to the back fields just like 163.  design longer runways and bigger hangers.  perk the heck out of it just like 262
Logged
Oaktree

56th Fighter group
Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 ... 172   Go Up
« previous next »