B-29 Super Fortress

[kilo2]

In case any of you didn't notice... CaptainFokker punted a thread that had been dead since April of 2008 (over a year).

WTG... keep the replies coming.

im sure if he posted a new thread he would have got the "use the search button hurr hurr" line.
but i did not notice it

[CaptainFokker]

Funny thing was, I did use the search function, but I didn't pay attention to the thread started/last post dates.

[LLogann]

Apples and oranges sir.  There wouldn't be remote turrets.  Think about it.  But hey, a great bunch of paragraphs nonetheless.   

My opinion has always been the difficulty and ramifications of the required modeling for the remote firing turrets. 

[waystin2]

[Skulls22]

Well, i dont really care anyway. I just want to see a nuke blow domthin up in AH2

[AcesHighMan2]

 

Screw it! I want the NOOOOOK man! 

 

[Nemisis]

yeah, or they can just make some of the mountain top bases at 33.5k or above special bomber fields.  That way you can still target them specifically to knock out the bombers and it reduces the time to climb if your flying one.

Holy CRAP. Scuzzy didn't edit you (I was half expecting him to just edit all your posts in this thread).

[TheAce]

oh hell why hold back.if your ganna ask for a big boy toyto fly........go bigger the biggest piston engine bomber ever......
THE B-36 J PEACE MAKER.

First flight wasn't until 1946...

[Jayhawk]

B-29 Superfortress, ya know why?

Because I'm bored and I hate kittens...

[Anaxogoras]

I'm first!

[Jayhawk]

yep yep, that's the good stuff

[AKP]

[Mar]

[Denholm]

The B-29 threads are slap-contests. One side believes it will greatly assist the game while the other knows it will unbalance the universe itself.




When oh when will the mayhem stop?

[jay]

they "could" (not ever gonna happen) put it in without the nuke (yet again not gonna happen)