Author Topic: B-29 Super Fortress  (Read 117626 times)

Offline 1pLUs44

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3332
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1530 on: August 30, 2009, 10:30:19 PM »
Seriously we ain't getting this bomber. never not going to happen so stop asking for it. there needs to be a temp ban if some 1 wants b29 and posts it any where on the forums. Its a great bomber and all but no way its like the tiger II too heavy and powerful. just ain't going to happen.also we need a permanent squelch button there's too many squeakers out there that need to be squelched. its squeaker squelching 09-when ever little kids aren't aloud to play games with 16 yr peeps and older peeps.And a longer squelch list instead of the current max of 10? need like list of 100 keep them squeaks at bay.

I personally think we should get it, so you don't get your way.  ;)
No one knows what the future may bring.

Offline CountD90

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1531 on: August 30, 2009, 10:35:48 PM »
^lol
GameID:Count
The Misfit Toys
Quote from: Wreked
If you are feeling a little useless, offended, or depressed, just remember that you were once the fastest and most victorious little sperm out of millions.

Offline ShrkBite

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 322
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1532 on: August 31, 2009, 12:45:40 AM »
so.........was a cat just saved? I THINK SO!!!!  :rock

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1533 on: August 31, 2009, 10:55:56 AM »
how about we take the ords of a lancaster, increase its speed, give it better defensive guns and skin it like a B-29.

perk it at 70.

Absolutely no nuke whatsoever.

It is a more acceptable B-29 dont you think?


Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1534 on: August 31, 2009, 11:00:40 AM »
No.   but maybe after your 30th "B-29 thread", the answer will still be "No"?
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1535 on: August 31, 2009, 11:10:10 AM »
As a player who likes the idea of bringing a B-29 into the game; these threads are getting old, I understand now.
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline curry1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2321
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1536 on: August 31, 2009, 11:12:24 AM »
I am pretty sure that even if we got the b-29 you wouldn't be able to get it off these runways which would make it kind of pointless.
Curry1-Since Tour 101

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1537 on: August 31, 2009, 11:17:39 AM »
all i said is that it is a little more acceptable.

I dont really want a b-29.

I would really like a G4M betty.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1538 on: August 31, 2009, 11:19:14 AM »
all i said is that it is a little more acceptable.

I dont really want a b-29.

I would really like a G4M betty.

Then why not start a "G4M Thread"?
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1539 on: August 31, 2009, 11:22:46 AM »
I am pretty sure that even if we got the b-29 you wouldn't be able to get it off these runways which would make it kind of pointless.

Well obviously that would be something to fix or alter if the B-29 was brought in, they aren't going to model a plane then not let you fly it.
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1540 on: August 31, 2009, 11:27:49 AM »
We will get the B-29. There is no stopping AH to develop it.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1541 on: August 31, 2009, 11:36:44 AM »
Quote
Then why not start a "G4M Thread"?

Because i was bored.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1542 on: August 31, 2009, 11:36:54 AM »
We will get the B-29. There is no stopping AH to develop it.

Really?   I recall Dale himself stating otherwise.  
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1543 on: August 31, 2009, 11:37:41 AM »
Because im a troll.

But then again, when your 13 year old CO is named "AceMan", that pretty much lays it all out there. 
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #1544 on: August 31, 2009, 11:44:35 AM »
But then again, when your 13 year old CO is named "AceMan", that pretty much lays it all out there. 

I've met Aceman in the EW arena, he seems alright to  me.



"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP