Author Topic: Cheif Justice Rehnquist Dies (Read 563 times)

Eagler · « **Reply #15 on:** September 04, 2005, 08:33:33 AM »

~~Cheif Justice Rehnquist~~

lazs2 · « **Reply #16 on:** September 04, 2005, 09:01:57 AM »

skyprancer... is that thing is his hand one of those "replicas" you brits are so proud/frieghtened of?

Well... We all knew that either kerrie or Bush would be putting at least two and maybe as many as three supremes on the bench...

This was one of the main reasons I voted for Bush.

I don't think he will be putting someone on who thinks that your city can confiscate your land to build a wall mart on... kerrie would have.

So what is wrong with a str4ict constitutionalist? You "progressives" won't lose anything... your socialist agenda will just be delayed a little for a few decades... hopefully ... a couple hundred more years. For the rest of us... it will be a relief.

lazs

midnight Target · « **Reply #17 on:** September 04, 2005, 07:19:04 PM »

Robertson's prayers have been answered.

airbumba · « **Reply #18 on:** September 04, 2005, 10:53:13 PM »

I'll bet that when Judge Renquist died, being a air vet from WW2, one of the last things he woulda seen, is that in the midst of all the mess concerning aid, he woulda seen the US Coast Guard saving THOUSANDS of lives, and I hope that eased his passing.

US Coast Guard rocks!!

1K3 · « **Reply #19 on:** September 04, 2005, 11:00:08 PM »

off topic but...

Some people here like Libertarians (yes, with big L)

Question, do Libertarians advocatte "open-border" policy?

Lazerus · « **Reply #20 on:** September 04, 2005, 11:06:28 PM »

I hope the days of SC judges being able to cite judgments from other countries as a basis for their decisions is gone. Pure constructionists are what this country needs to get it back on the track of the original intent of The Constitution of the United States.

Just my opinion of course.

Lazerus · « **Reply #21 on:** September 04, 2005, 11:27:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by 1K3
Question, do Libertarians advocatte "open-border" policy?

Yes they do.

One of the biggest problems I have with the Libertarian position.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #22 on:** September 05, 2005, 02:56:57 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lazerus
Yes they do.

One of the biggest problems I have with the Libertarian position.

with a catch

Quote

The Libertarian Party has long recognized the importance of allowing free and open immigration, understanding that this leads to a growing and more prosperous America. We condemn the xenophobic immigrant bashing that would build a wall around the United States. At the same time, we recognize that the right to enter the United States does not include the right to economic entitlements such as welfare. The freedom to immigrate is a freedom of opportunity, not a guarantee of a handout.

AdmRose · « **Reply #23 on:** September 05, 2005, 09:19:49 AM »

Back to the days of isolationism I say. Damn you Woodrow Wilson.

lazs2 · « **Reply #24 on:** September 06, 2005, 09:29:24 AM »

gunslinger... if you had no welfare or socialism you would have no need for borders so far as immigration was concerned. Schooling would be the same if you had vouchers.

It is only socialist policies that make it necessary to have closed borders.

lazs

Sandman · « **Reply #25 on:** September 06, 2005, 09:33:26 AM »

lazs2, you do realize that some people come here simply because the pay is better?

lazs2 · « **Reply #26 on:** September 07, 2005, 09:09:28 AM »

Yep... so? It wouldn't be that much better if they had to pay for every service that they used.... If every citizen got vouchers say for his tax money extorted from him and non citizens were not allowed to attend or charged at the voucher rate.... If everone had to have medical insurance and there was no welfare.

If it costs you more to live than you can make... you probly wouldn't even want to live there.

socialism allows illegals to leach off the system and keep all the money they earn.

lazs