« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: N.O. weapons  (Read 638 times)

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
N.O. weapons
« on: September 08, 2005, 11:54:50 AM »
N.O. PD superintendent just realeased a statement live. "As of now only law enforcement will be allowed to have weapons."
  Once again someone in the powers that be has overstepped their bounds.
  If followed, as stated, it takes away the right of the citizen to have some means to protect themselves from the lawless.
  Common sense has taken a vacation.
Those robbing, terrorizing, etc . does not give a rat`s patunia about what the law says.
  If considered, a law abiding citizen as of now, that is still protecting their property and lives, have been put in a situation of deciding if they will follow this order or violate it. Violating it would mean that this order has just turned a law abider into a criminal in theory.
  It does absolutely nothing to help anyone.
  Those commiting violent acts with weapons are not affected.
Logged
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline AKS\/\/ulfe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4287
N.O. weapons
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2005, 12:06:17 PM »
That is violating a constitutional right. If any court upheld charges of a legal gun owner being charged with illegally having a gun, then to hell with it - America is done.
-SW
Logged

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
N.O. weapons
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2005, 12:08:08 PM »
Yep. I can tell you my choice would take about a half second to decide.
Logged
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
N.O. weapons
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2005, 12:14:37 PM »
I'm pretty sure that a PD Superintendant doesn't have the power to declare marshall law.

Of course, I could be wrong.
Logged
sand

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
N.O. weapons
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2005, 12:47:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
I'm pretty sure that a PD Superintendant doesn't have the power to declare marshall law.
 


:)
  The question is , has anyone told him that?
Logged
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
N.O. weapons
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2005, 01:00:35 PM »
Send guns, money and lawyers.  THE **** HAS HIT THE FAN.
Logged
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
N.O. weapons
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2005, 01:04:33 PM »
:rofl
Logged
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline GreenCloud

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1365
N.O. weapons
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2005, 01:05:38 PM »
no citizen needs a gun


only trained profesional police osifers
Logged

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
N.O. weapons
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2005, 01:07:47 PM »
Be a cold day in hell before I gave up my firearms in N.O. Thats the best they could come up with? Punish the law abiding people? Good plan, all crime will now cease.:aok
Logged

Offline Makarov9

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
      • http://www.332nd.org/
N.O. weapons
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2005, 01:34:11 PM »
Saw this picture on WWL TV's website. Looks like he is a "take-no-****" kind of a guy. He needs to evacuate but looks like he is saying no way.

Logged

Offline AKS\/\/ulfe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4287
N.O. weapons
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2005, 01:35:29 PM »
Looks like Gollum.
-SW
Logged

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
N.O. weapons
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2005, 01:46:11 PM »
Gollum was a bad ass. :)
Logged
sand

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
N.O. weapons
« Reply #12 on: September 08, 2005, 01:58:29 PM »
Lol funny that you should compare Gollum and the ring to this guy and his gun.

My precioussss... :rofl
Logged
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline Makarov9

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
      • http://www.332nd.org/
N.O. weapons
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2005, 02:11:11 PM »
He had no gun. This is the caption that was under the photo:

" Chin Chun Nin argues with police who were trying to convince him to evacuate New Orleans. "

http://www.wwltv.com/
Logged

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
N.O. weapons
« Reply #14 on: September 08, 2005, 02:22:50 PM »
There's no way the N.O. Police Supernintendo can make a proclamation like that without martial law, as far as I know.

Question: Are there circumstances revolving around the enforced evacuation that change this?  Eg, if it becomes illegal to remain?  When someone is arrested for a crime, their firearm is taken while they are in custody, right?  Is there a correlation between this and how he would be able to criminalize possession in N.O.?

BTW, still haven't seen any stories verifying this quote, can anyone provide a link?  The specific wording may be important.
Logged
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »