I predict your liberal representatives will confirm Judge Robertson, by and large, in spite of your assertion that he is a rookie. Can you explain this?
As a matter of fact I can..
If both political parties vote along party lines.. then he will be confirmed..
its a simple matter of who controls congress.. As of current the republican party (my party.. Yeah im a flaming liberal you nitz....Im a republican..**) has majority..
In the case of Bolton you had republican decent becuase quite frankly Bolton's track record is less than perfect..
In the case of roberts as i said earlier I do not disagree with his view or see him a unqualified canidate (stop putting words in my mouth, always this feeble tactic.. pathetic..)
here is what i said again. for the sweet pickles bus non reading imparied..
personally i dont think roberts is really out of line or a poor canidate.. but when as a rookie he is nominated for chief justice that questions the credibility of the presidents choice..
Thats what I said.. And as far as a rookie... how long has he been a justice of the supreme court... 0 is the answer.. otherwise known as a rookie.. He was a outstanding clerk.. An outstanding trial lawyer.. but supreme court justice no...
thats what im saying.. He is very young.. (to his credit i say this..) and as a result I see the angle of trying to get him into the Supremes especially as the chief justice.. Its clearly political.. by all means appoint him.. have him work his way up to the chief position.. But to appoint him to chief wet behind the ears is clearly partisan..
As a President that claims to be a uniter.. this manuever (yes its a tactical manuever) is clearly imo going to wrong direction and sending the wrong message to the demo / dumbocrats.. (i would have compromised on the first nomination.. and a ron jeremy production on the second nomination with the backing of the demo's unless they would want to renig (a trap for the upcomming congress election that i set by doing such..), but thats me, its called tact.. / compromise)(I suggest you study Ben Franklin..)
as such the next appointment will be fought tooth and nail by all parties at the cost of the credibility of the executive , congress and the supreme judiciary. At these times such foolishness is not needed and instead compromise for all political parties should be paramount for the prosperity of our nation..
**what many of you fail to realize is that you are all members of the American Party by default.. if you dont like that.. leave our country.. No individual is going to be some drone or cog for some political party and still have their freewill as per the founders of this country. You can be democrat and have Republican Ideals and vice versa.. so the stereotypical liberal this liberal that .. conservative this or conservative that.. thats BS and you know it.. A political party is like a union.. Use it for strength in numbers when they agree upon same line as you.. but if you disagree on those lines there are no rules that prohibit your own choice or freewill, or are there you tell me..?
you call me a liberal.. or you allure to it.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=liberalRead that and tell me whats wrong with those principles.. half of you people on these boards / elsewhere misuse this word on a daily basis because your ignorant.. (ignorant is not bad so dont take it as a insult {another misused word i might add} )
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=ConservativeRead that and tell whats wrong with those principles of thought either..
trust me when i tell you most people of the USA fall under both of those definitions.. care to argue this? rebuttal?
Welcome to the American Party...
DoctorYo
