« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: 109k replacing the G10  (Read 684 times)

Offline Balsy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 717
109k replacing the G10
« on: September 16, 2005, 04:20:58 PM »
K pwnd in AW.

whats the difference between the G10 and the K?

balsy
Logged

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2005, 04:30:08 PM »
K-4 won't have the 20mm nose gun as an option.

Other than that, AH's Bf109G-10 has always been a K-4.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2005, 04:31:35 PM »
Looking at the cockpit picture it looks like the ammo counters might actually be functional.  Are they?
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Mustaine

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4139
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2005, 04:32:38 PM »
who ever did the skin,,, am i noticing my fuel and first aid kit logos i made for the 190? ;) if so cool! if not, no problem, just thought i might have made something really cool for once :aok ;)
Logged
Genetically engineered in a lab, and raised by wolverines -- ]V[ E G A D E T ]-[
AoM DFC ZLA BMF and a bunch of other acronyms.

Offline Bruno

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1252
      • http://4jg53.org
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2005, 04:57:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Looking at the cockpit picture it looks like the ammo counters might actually be functional.  Are they?



On the top left? Those are Ah's 'trim position' and the 'flap position' (left one) indciators.

Ammo counters are on the bottom center.
Logged

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2005, 05:05:23 PM »
What the heck is with the ammo counters being HIDDEN? This one's behind the stick, P38s are behind a thick arm that holds up the stick, the ki84s are off the screen almost.... I want to be able to glance down and see my ammo count, not hit auto pilot hit F8 then with 2 hands manuver my head position and head angle to move over and tilt down just to see my ammo count, by which time I'm dead.
Logged

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2005, 05:13:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bruno
On the top left? Those are Ah's 'trim position' and the 'flap position' (left one) indciators.

Ammo counters are on the bottom center.

Bah.  You're right.

Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
What the heck is with the ammo counters being HIDDEN? This one's behind the stick, P38s are behind a thick arm that holds up the stick, the ki84s are off the screen almost.... I want to be able to glance down and see my ammo count, not hit auto pilot hit F8 then with 2 hands manuver my head position and head angle to move over and tilt down just to see my ammo count, by which time I'm dead.


I thought you didn't want "gamey" things like mechanisms that the real aircraft had and yet here you are asking for mechanisms, digital ammo counters, that no aircraft had.  What gives?
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #7 on: September 16, 2005, 05:19:54 PM »
Good provided it explode like all 109 ...
Logged

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2005, 05:22:14 PM »
Karnak? Please don't feel there's some need to argue pointlessly with me.

I don't want auto deploying flaps. There's no fun in that. But I *DO* want to be able to see my instruments (as do so many people that were in an uproar after the ki84 and P38s were released) and I *DO* want to be able to see my ammo counters. They are there, and HTC seems determined to keep them. I just want to SEE the things without having to study for 6 years as a circus contortionist!
Logged

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #9 on: September 16, 2005, 05:25:21 PM »
(way off topic but)

without automatic deploying flaps for N1K2-J, might as well delete that model and replace it with the J2M3 fighter. N1K is badly modeled from the start anyway.

Btw didnt 109K and G-14 have "tall tail" section?
Logged

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #10 on: September 16, 2005, 05:26:59 PM »
Look again at the pics. That is the tall tail.
Logged

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #11 on: September 16, 2005, 07:25:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
I don't want auto deploying flaps.  



What plane has that? ( currently in AH)
Logged

Offline AmRaaM

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 349
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2005, 07:27:23 PM »
nice model,

But sorry for all the newbs since the performance stats will never be written and posted on the website along with 20 other planes.
Logged

Offline jaxxo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2005, 10:32:31 PM »
i loverd the k4 in aw..was my choice ride
Logged

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
109k replacing the G10
« Reply #14 on: September 16, 2005, 10:38:56 PM »
lol its gonna be much harder to get fighter kills with just 3 centimeter rock and a 51 cal pellets. With that kind of weapon i might end up playing with my food :D
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »