Author Topic: Can we have image sig now! (Read 1179 times)

Simaril · « **Reply #15 on:** September 21, 2005, 08:22:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by faint
my splash page for a website that is under construstion that I am making:

c4d + photoshop 7.0

Was this INTENDED to be ironically hilarious?

faint · « **Reply #16 on:** September 21, 2005, 08:26:49 PM »

thanks

DipStick · « **Reply #17 on:** September 21, 2005, 08:31:09 PM »

Thanks HT for your wisdom in NOT allowing it.

SkyChimp · « **Reply #18 on:** September 21, 2005, 08:34:18 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by DipStick
Thanks HT for your wisdom in NOT allowing it.

ekk he messed up the post huh dip:mad:

RightF00T · « **Reply #19 on:** September 21, 2005, 08:45:15 PM »

This is a better solution....

1K3 · « **Reply #20 on:** September 21, 2005, 09:06:30 PM »

how's this?

Meatwad · « **Reply #21 on:** September 21, 2005, 09:08:25 PM »

too big,

glorious · « **Reply #22 on:** September 21, 2005, 09:59:06 PM »

sigh...

SkyChimp · « **Reply #23 on:** September 21, 2005, 10:00:51 PM »

oh oh oh another accout for faint hehe....

38ruk · « **Reply #24 on:** September 21, 2005, 10:56:10 PM »

Quote

I htink I just pwned HTC Web Designer

Quote

I am up for hire btw.

How much to go away ?

Roscoroo · « **Reply #25 on:** September 21, 2005, 11:42:32 PM »

perfect example of wasting space and bandwith.

image sigs suk IMO

MrRiplEy[H] · « **Reply #26 on:** September 22, 2005, 02:18:23 AM »

All sigs suck. They are only used by professional posters who want to assert their superior postal attitude in every post.

End result is an UBB where you have to try to find the message between the sigs.

SFCHONDO · « **Reply #27 on:** September 22, 2005, 02:31:19 AM »

SkyWolf · « **Reply #28 on:** September 22, 2005, 07:12:36 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
All sigs suck. They are only used by professional posters who want to assert their superior postal attitude in every post.

I'm usually trying to hide my postal attitude. Frightens my coworkers.

BlauK · « **Reply #29 on:** September 22, 2005, 08:03:55 AM »

It is a superb decision not to allow sig pics. What is the point of having sigs that are larger than the actual message? Those pics only hog band width, make everything slower and generally look stupid in a thread where same person has posted every second post. Just take a look e.g. at UbiSoft's Pacific Fighter board.

If you need to show what you are made of, put a link of your sig picture in your text sig.