Author Topic: Super vrs Uber  (Read 20202 times)

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
Super vrs Uber
« on: September 23, 2005, 11:21:29 AM »
Gents,

I have a idea that I will probably be beaten over the head for even proposing but I have to ask because of the non-stop threads on 109's with 1.98 boost and Spits with 150 octane fuel. It seems to be a contest of who got the fastest prop plane into combat 5 minutes before the end of the war.

Based on this and what I (just my opinion) believe to be true.

1. The war in Europe was "Fate D'compli" after D-Day June 1944.
2. The War in Japan was really over after??? Some would say Midway 1942 but I would say after Iwo Jima or maybe even Okinawa. Call it 1944 to make it even.
3. Therefore all of the aircraft that really won the war were in service before this time. This means before, not like the D9, P-51D and others coming into service right before that time either and that would many late model aircraft in AH today.

Based on these points I would argue that after that time everything else needs to fall under a different catagory.

SUPER VRS UBER

This catagory includes many such as

109K
TA152
190D9
ME262
ME163
etc

However this catagory would also include

P-51H
F8F
F7F
P-80
Meteor
etc

Why?

Because all of these AC were in service by wars end and the ONLY differentiating factor is the fact the war was being fought in Germany and in Japan at that time and not in the US or Britian.

The only reason these AC did not see combat was because of

1.logistics- Spare parts, training, deployement etc.
2. Need- Why rush AC into service when the ones you have are doing fine.
3. German aircraft of this variety saw combat in proto-type aircraft with testpilots behind the controls. Corky Meyer (Grumman), Boone Guyton (Vought) , Tony LeVier (Lockheed) never had to worry about 109's or Zero's flying CAP over their fields.

I would luv to see my F4U-3 with a Turbo Supercharger flying 490MPH at 28K but the Japanese could not even fly at 350MPH TAS at that altitude so the F4U-1D was more than fast enough.

If you really want to know what was the best aircraft compare apples to apples and just use the best of the bunch. If you want to know what AC won the war you have to tone down the rhetoric a tad.

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2005, 11:34:38 AM »
I agree that there is entirely too much emphasis on late 44-45 a/c, in general.

...However, the threads are just as long and hotly debated over BoB 1940, 1943 ETO or 1942 PAC when the subject comes up, and it does.
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2005, 11:37:05 AM »
Aircraft that in my opinion won the war:

USA:
B-17E/F/G
B-24D/J
B-25
B-26B
C-46
C-47A
F4F-4
F4U-1
F6F-3
P-38F/G/H/J
P-47D-5

UK:
Beaufighter Mk X
Halifax Mk I/II/III
Hurricane Mk I/Mk II
Lancaster Mk I/III
Mosquito Mk IV/VI/IX/XIX
Spitfire Mk I/II/V/VIII/IX
Swordfish
Typhoon Mk I
Wellington Mk I/III/IX

USSR:
I-16/24
Il-2
La-5/5F/5FN
LaGG-3
MiG-3
Pe-2/2FT
Yak-1/7/9D/9T


If I read you right that is what you are talking about instead of F4U-4s, P-47Ns, Spitfire Mk XIVs, Tempest Mk Vs, La-7s and Yak-9UTs.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2005, 02:10:10 PM »
Indeed,

Maybe we should have a 1944 and 1945 theater where the best A/C of both sides could beat each others heads in.

Frankly I would like to see the P-51H and F8F vrs anything.

Also the P-80 would be a nice touch. The Meteor should definitely be in AH now.

Offline Bruno

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1252
      • http://4jg53.org
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2005, 02:18:55 PM »
Quote
This catagory includes many such as

109K
TA152
190D9
ME262
ME163
etc




The only reason these AC did not see combat was because of





3.German aircraft of this variety saw combat in proto-type aircraft with testpilots behind the controls.


All the above aircraft saw combat at the squadron level and were in 'squadron service', all have confirmed kills etc...

Not proto-types or by test pilots but by pilots at the squadron level.

I am not sure what difference this makes in regards to your post I just thought I would correct that.

YMMV

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2005, 03:06:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bruno
All the above aircraft saw combat at the squadron level and were in 'squadron service', all have confirmed kills etc...

Not proto-types or by test pilots but by pilots at the squadron level.

I am not sure what difference this makes in regards to your post I just thought I would correct that.

YMMV


Let's be accurate...

The below aircraft were in deployed active duty squadron service when he war ended, they were not prototypes. They were combat ready aircraft. Meteors were shooting down V-1s long before Germany surrendered.

P-51H: Deployed to Iwo Jima August, 7 1945.

F8F: VF-19 deployed on the USS Langley, enroute to Japan at surrender.

F7F: Deployed with VMF(N)-533 on August 14, 1945.

Meteor: See above.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Bruno

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1252
      • http://4jg53.org
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2005, 03:22:17 PM »
Quote
Let's be accurate...


?

What does anything in your post have to do with what I wrote?

Nothing, I responded to this:

Quote
3. German aircraft of this variety saw combat in proto-type aircraft with testpilots behind the controls.


Which as written is not necessarily correct.

I made no mention of the other planes listed in the orignal post.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2005, 03:40:11 PM »
Fait accompli
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2005, 04:16:19 PM »
Hi Widewing,

I'd say F4UDOA put some of the Luftwaffe aircraft in the Über category for their performance, not for their late appearance :-)

>The below aircraft were in deployed active duty squadron service when he war ended, they were not prototypes. They were combat ready aircraft.

Note that they were ready only after VE day, so pitting them against Luftwaffe aircraft ready before VE day might still be a bit hard on chronology ;-)

However, I'm a great fan of "what if" scenarios, and I'd like to see all the late-war planes implemented, plus a number of promising early-war designs such as the Westland Whirlwind and the Fw 187 :-)

In fact, I'm still holding my breath for the Do 335 that was promised for Confirmed Kill in the Computer Gaming World 10 years ago!

About the coolest thing in flight simulation games was the historical availability of new aircraft types as the simulated war ran on, first implemented in Dynamix' Red Baron. Aces High doesn't feature such a concept, but it would be just perfect for bringing what-if-aircraft and überplanes into the mix just to see how good they really were.

>Meteors were shooting down V-1s long before Germany surrendered.

I wish Meteors were implemented!

Though the RAF didn't consider them completely combat-ready due to high-speed snaking problems, with a simulation that can model these problems there's no reason not to include the Meteor in the game. In the game, every player can then reach his own conclusion on how serious this handicap really was.

I mean, it's a game, not a virtual re-enactment session. It's supposed to be fun! :-)

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2005, 04:17:18 PM »
Bruno,

I seem to remember a story of un ungunned TA-152 taking on two Tempest causing one to crash?

If I am not mistaken it was from an experamental field. I sure someone can regurgitate  that story from somewhere.

The point is the 109K does not have to fly at the absolute penultimate performance numbers that it ever achieved and either does the Spit XIV or P-51. The fact is that there were superior fighters in transit to the war zone with fresh pilots in large numbers on the way.

How many Ta-152's were built by wars end?

There were over 2,000 F4U-4's built by the end of hostilities and Goodyear had yet to build one.

The point is there is simply no point argueing about a couple inches of manifold pressure when these aircraft were on the edge of obsolenses by wars end.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2005, 04:45:36 PM »
The Spitfire gave a number of years of good service after WWII as well.  It aged better than most fighters ever have.

But I think it was mostly a fluke that it did so.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Bruno

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1252
      • http://4jg53.org
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2005, 05:53:47 PM »
Quote
I seem to remember a story of un ungunned TA-152 taking on two Tempest causing one to crash?


No it wasn't 'ungunned'. It was Willie Reschke and JG301. Yes it was already deployed to squadron service. Reschke and JG301 also engaged in combat with Yak 9us over Berlin shooting a few of them down.

Quote
The point is the 109K does not have to fly at the absolute penultimate performance numbers that it ever achieved and either does the Spit XIV or P-51. The fact is that there were superior fighters in transit to the war zone with fresh pilots in large numbers on the way.


Instead of dealing with speculation lets deal with what happened. That fact is the K-4 saw service, it and the pilots who flew it had 'confirmed kills'.

What K-4 (G-10 )does AH have that flies at  'penultimate performance'? There's no 1.98 ata or 2.03 ata Kurfurst in AH nor will there be (or should be).

Quote
How many Ta-152's were built by wars end?


Quote
Ta152H-0 Work Number: 150001 to 150020: production by Focke Wulf at Cottbus. (19)

Ta152H-1 Work Number: 150021 to 150040, 150167 to 15169: production by Focke Wulf at Cottbus. Many more Ta152 H-series planned but not build., although possible one Ta152H-2 build at Cottbus. (21/1)

Source: "Focke Wulf 190, Production Line To Frontline" by Malcolm V. Lowe

19 Ta152H-0´s,
21 Ta152H-1
1 Ta152H-2.


Ta-152s saw more combat then any of the allied planes you listed. If you want to speculate about what would have happened if the war in Europe didn't end then why stop there? We can speculate all sorts of other things.

IIRC at the time of introduction into AH the Ta-152 was never a plane folks asked for. Its not a plane that sees a lot of usage. It could disappear from the plane set and all but a few folks would give it a second thought.

Quote
The point is there is simply no point argueing about a couple inches of manifold pressure when these aircraft were on the edge of obsolenses by wars end.


No offense but you seem not to know much about LW aircraft. If you want to turn this into a thread about performance then we can but none of the LW planes you listed were or would have been 'obsolete' even compared to those 'super' allied aircraft you listed.

However, I am not arguing anything along those lines. I am correcting your claim that:

Quote
3. German aircraft of this variety saw combat in proto-type aircraft with testpilots behind the controls.


All those LW aircraft you listed were deployed into squadron service and had confirmed kills.

Hohun,

Quote
I wish Meteors were implemented!


 616 Sqn received 2 Meteors Is on 12 July '44. By 2 Aug '44 they had 8. These were in 'service evaluation' and not fully deployed. They did fly sorties against V-1s shooting a couple down on 4 Aug '44. By Sept '44 the V-1 launch sites in Europe were over run and in total the Meteors only intercepted about 16.

Claiming that the Meteor was 'in service' well before the end of the war Europe is an exaggeration on the part of Widewing.

Meteor Is were never in 'full production'.

Beginning in Dec '44 the Marks IIIs (the first variant that can be considered as 'full production') entered production. After receiving Meteor IIIs in Jan '45 one flight from 616 Sdn was set up to defend against 262s for the 2nd TAF but saw no combat.

Sometime in April '45 616 Sqn even flew a few ground attack sorties but other then that saw no 'combat'.

I agree with Squire:

Quote
I agree that there is entirely too much emphasis on late 44-45 a/c, in general.


A lot of folks want the latest and 'bestest' late war wonderwaffe or Allied super plane. I for one would prefer more planes from before '44 on down. Even then I would prefer planes that most represent what was common at the the time rather then rare.

I am not sure how much influence the players have over the developers in deciding which planes get added to this game but even so it appears a lot of folks think WW2 air combat only revolves around the last 6 months of the war.

I am not to sure what this thread is about and I don't want to hijack it any more so I will leave it to you...

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2005, 07:01:01 PM »
Bruno,

I recall that there was a dogfight between those Meteors and some Fw190s before some Spitfires arrived and chased the Meteors off thinking they were German (being jets and all).

While no kills were claimed by either side, both were trying to kill.  That is combat by some measure of the word.

I do agree with you about the Meteor Mk I not being combat ready.  The Meteor Mk III was really the first regular service version.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline OttoJ

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2005, 07:38:24 PM »
The 262 is far from being in the same "nearly made it" or "just made it" category as the Comet and Bearcat etc. The 262 entered limited production in September 1943. 262 fighterbombers of Erprobungskommando Schenk saw action in June 1944 against the Allied invasion, and the first documented air combat involving a 262 took place on 25 July 1944 when a Schwalbe pounced on an RAF Mosquito that barely managed to escape. One 262 was shot down near Brussels on 28 August 1944 by a pair of USAAF P-47 Thunderbolts, the first Me-262 to be lost to direct enemy action. Before the wars end more than 1400 262 were produced.

Offline Rafe35

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2005, 07:47:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by F4UDOA
There were over 2,000 F4U-4's built by the end of hostilities and Goodyear had yet to build one.

Two.  Just two FG-4, not one.
Rafe35
Former member of VF-17 "Jolly Rogers"