Originally posted by Swoop
Ya know......I've just finished reading that fella's extracts from his book about diplomacy......and he says players who form alliances should be shot cos it ruins the game.
He's right. The original designer of Diplomacy envisioned that a 'perfect' game of Diplomacy would never end, since every Power would always act to prevent another from winning. As one Power might have a shot at victory others would turn on him, but as he faded another Power would rise which in turn would need to be attacked by everyone, and so forth. It's actually my favorite playstyle but it's not viable on the Imp board.
Nonetheless in my early diplomacy I stressed this to my targets, talking about how England was spread out across the globe and was no danger to anyone but would use my diverse position to maintain the Balance of Power.
For some reason everyone believed this.