Author Topic: Engine Overheat - Poll  (Read 1690 times)

Pepino

  • Guest
Engine Overheat - Poll
« on: January 19, 2001, 07:08:00 AM »
Do you want the engine to overheat when you firewall throttle?

Of course, overheating leading to power loss.

Sorry for the other post, screwed the "- Poll" thingy.

Cheers,

Pepe

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2001, 07:08:00 AM »
yes

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2001, 07:37:00 AM »
Yes sure

Offline Lance

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1316
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2001, 07:52:00 AM »
What I'd really like is a single four question poll instead of four single question polls.  As for the questions...

Don't care.
Don't care.
Don't care.
Don't care.

lazs

  • Guest
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2001, 08:23:00 AM »
Yep but only if you run full throttle for more than thirty minutes or so.  Otherwise....

NO
lazs

Offline Naso

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1535
      • http://www.4stormo.it
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2001, 08:34:00 AM »
Yes

funked

  • Guest
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2001, 09:34:00 AM »
What Lazs said.  Many of these planes could fly wide open for very long periods of time.

Offline Swoop

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9180
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2001, 10:23:00 AM »
Reposted from WEP poll:

WEP shouldnt switch itself off.......instead the engine should just get hotter and hotter and hotter......you'll eventually (and I'm not talking a mere 10 minutes here) start to hear a ringing sound as things start to melt.......then a gradual power fade until, finally, something important melts.....and either the engine suddenly seizes or a barrel gets fouled by a lump of molten piston ring or whatever......and then detonation occurs.


Swoop

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2001, 12:43:00 PM »
I wouldn't mind any bad at all if they would model whole engine management in its full complexity...  that would only make up for my interest towards currently simple air-quake aces high

Offline Wanker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4030
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2001, 12:49:00 PM »
 
Quote
What Lazs said. Many of these planes could fly wide open for very long periods of time.

Yes, but since fuel consumption has a modifier, shouldn't engine performance have the same sort of thing?

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2001, 12:50:00 PM »
YES please. Keep the engine at 100% or at WEP and it goes past the redline... and you in serious trouble farmboy....

Offline popeye

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3715
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2001, 01:19:00 PM »
Yes.  What lazs said.
KONG

Where is Major Kong?!?

Offline Sancho

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1043
      • http://www.56thfightergroup.com
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2001, 02:02:00 PM »
Yes, make it an arena configurable option with a modifier variable, like fuel consumption.  Really long duration until overheat in MA, average in scenarios, less time in the Afrika scenario, South Pacific, that kinda thing.
--
Sancho
http://www.jump.net/~cs3" TARGET=_blank>63rd FS, 56th FG
"Zemke's Wolfpack"
 

lazs

  • Guest
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2001, 02:08:00 PM »
LOL! well, if we are going to have some kind of anal "engine heat time modifier" thingie then I vote we have a "time to climb" modifier that matches.   That should give us about a 20 second to 20K climb rate give or take a second.
lazs

Offline SKurj

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3630
Engine Overheat - Poll
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2001, 06:45:00 PM »
NO

AKskurj