Author Topic: The Death of Politics? (Read 1636 times)

Hangtime · « **Reply #75 on:** October 22, 2005, 12:15:58 AM »

is it clean slate time yet?

oh, I do hope someone tells me when it's time to clean house and start over.

i would truly hate to miss that party.

Nash · « **Reply #76 on:** October 22, 2005, 12:20:36 AM »

Clean slate time is comin' soon.... everyone's checkin' thier watches.

Problem is, nobody seems to have the foggiest idea of whom to clean slate with.

Toad · « **Reply #77 on:** October 22, 2005, 12:31:49 AM »

Making any predictions? Just who and how many are going to jail? Enquiring minds want to know.

Nash · « **Reply #78 on:** October 22, 2005, 12:43:26 AM »

Hard to say.

22 Indictments have been mentioned for a coupla weeks now, but that was before Judy found the June notes and Karl made another last ditch effort in front of the GJ.

But word on the street was that there were 22 possible indictments. Since then, two guys in Cheney's office have flipped. Which, funnily enough, tugs at your heartstrings, Toad. Because this is all about the lies told for going to war. You're aware of that little cabal, created to make the war palatable to everyone else, right? Well, that's pretty much at the heart of it. This is what we're talking about. A pack of lies, and a deck of cards crumbling.

Out of curiousity, do you know anything about Fitzgerald?

Toad · « **Reply #79 on:** October 22, 2005, 01:04:22 AM »

Just wondered if in all your giggling, titillating excitement you had made up a program so you could track all the players.

Fitzgerald? Nope. I haven't really been following this too closely. You won't understand this but it's because I know it'll be what it will be. I have no input into DOJ proceedings. I can't write DOJ like I would a Congressman.

If indeed they lied... and it can be proven that they lied... I want everyone involved to be held fully accountable to the maximum extent of the law. I think you'll recall I've said that since the beginning.

I think the difference is that while you relish it and enjoy it, it will just disgust me. I don't find it funny in the least; it angers me exceedingly.

Nash · « **Reply #80 on:** October 22, 2005, 01:12:26 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
Just wondered if in all your giggling, titillating excitement you had made up a program so you could track all the players.

Like a computer programer? Who writes software?

I aint that smart.

I just pay attention. That doesnt take brains, Toad, it just takes a concern. You lack it? Fine.

Quote

Fitzgerald? Nope. I haven't really been following this too closely. You won't understand this but it's because I know it'll be what it will be. I have no input into DOJ proceedings. I can't write DOJ like I would a Congressman.

You really have no idea, do you?

Quote

If indeed they lied... and it can be proven that they lied... I want everyone involved to be held fully accountable to the maximum extent of the law. I think you'll recall I've said that since the beginning.

Oooh geeze that's soooooooo honorable. Pfft. "If they are guilty, then punish them."

Get yer fat arse off the couch. If you want to talk to me about it - do your Golly-geened homework.

Quote

I think the difference is that while you relish it and enjoy it, it will just disgust me. I don't find it funny in the least; it angers me exceedingly. [/B]

Good! I HOPE it angers you! It should!

Sandman · « **Reply #81 on:** October 22, 2005, 01:21:26 AM »

I'm pretty much past the anger. If any of the Bush administration end up in front of the courts, I'm going to giggle like a school girl.

Toad · « **Reply #82 on:** October 22, 2005, 08:05:43 AM »

I think the difference is that it always angers me when elected and appointed politicians and leaders break their trust.

See, it angers me when either party does it. Always has. That's apparently the difference.

As for discussing it with you, nah. You're taking a little too much vicarious pleasure in this.