« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: See yah!  (Read 544 times)

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
See yah!
« on: October 28, 2005, 12:35:24 PM »
Logged
sand

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
See yah!
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2005, 12:45:54 PM »
Send him to Baghdad to drive convoy trucks for the duration.
Logged

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
See yah!
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2005, 01:11:48 PM »
a two year iinvestigation into the so called outing of a "secret agent" and thats all he came up with? What happened to the CIA"leak"?

can you say witch hunt?

can you say 2006 elections?
Logged

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
See yah!
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2005, 01:13:23 PM »
Of course it's a witch hunt.

We taxpayers spent millions on some other long investigation and all we got was a stained blue dress. This is par for the course. ;)
Logged
sand

Offline dhaus

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 308
See yah!
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2005, 01:37:19 PM »
All he came up with?!!  These charges qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors sufficient to impeach a president!
Logged

Offline BluKitty

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 385
      • http://
See yah!
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2005, 01:43:52 PM »
Witch hunt??? This was an illegal move to help support false information in the quest for war.  It was a move to discredit and distract people from the truth of no "WMD"s, and no crediable threat from Iraq.  All of this so the Neo-conservative 'Plan for a New American Century' could move forward.

_____________________________ _________

What happend to Clinton was a witch hunt....This was about fixing the case for a War .. which isn't illegal, maybe immoral.... but fixing a case for war by illegal means is both.  Slightly diffrant ballgame form the defenition of sexual intercoarse and 'purgery'.  If you ask an ambiguous question you'd ought to expect an ambiguous answer.  

I fail to see how this is a witch hunt?

From Fitzgerald on CNN
"Mr. Libby was the frist known offical to tell a reporter"

It's illegal to identify a N.O.C. or any covert U.S. agent.  Hardly a witch hunt.
Logged

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
See yah!
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2005, 01:49:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BluKitty


It's illegal to identify a N.O.C. or any covert U.S. agent.  Hardly a witch hunt.


LMAO she lost her so called NOC status 5 years before this eledged outing.
Thus it is leagal be cause she was no longer covert.


Bronk
Logged
See Rule #4

Offline Krusher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
See yah!
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2005, 01:49:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by dhaus
All he came up with?!!  These charges qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors sufficient to impeach a president!



Psst, Libby isn't president
Logged

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
See yah!
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2005, 01:53:23 PM »
"i never had sex with that women, not once"...clinton lying to a grand jury.
Logged

Offline Krusher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
See yah!
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2005, 01:57:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BluKitty


It's illegal to identify a N.O.C. or any covert U.S. agent.  Hardly a witch hunt.


So why wasn't he charged with said crime?

Could it be because the crime never happened?
Logged

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
See yah!
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2005, 02:00:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
"i never had sex with that women, not once"...clinton lying to a grand jury.


IIRC, he was tried for that. Oh yeah... acquitted too.
Logged
sand

Offline dhaus

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 308
See yah!
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2005, 02:01:45 PM »
By golly, you're right!  If he isn't the sitting president, then I guess the charges on which Libby was indicted aren't crucial to the rule of law and are mere technicalities because he can't be impeached.
Logged

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
See yah!
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2005, 02:01:58 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusher
So why wasn't he charged with said crime?

Could it be because the crime never happened?


He may still be charged with that crime. The prosecution will not be limited to the  indictments of the grand jury, I believe.
Logged
sand

Offline Krusher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
See yah!
« Reply #13 on: October 28, 2005, 02:39:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
He may still be charged with that crime. The prosecution will not be limited to the  indictments of the grand jury, I believe.


The prosecuter stated flat out in his press confrence, that he has no case for the outting of the agent.
Logged

Offline Krusher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
See yah!
« Reply #14 on: October 28, 2005, 02:40:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by dhaus
By golly, you're right!  If he isn't the sitting president, then I guess the charges on which Libby was indicted aren't crucial to the rule of law and are mere technicalities because he can't be impeached.


He is not the sitting president, acting president, vice president or president of the student council.  

He is a vp's chief of staff
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »