Author Topic: B-36 (Read 363 times)

RAIDER14 · « **on:** November 07, 2005, 10:46:20 PM »

was reading about the B-36,cool stuff:aok

http://www.airbornegrafix.com/HistoricAircraft/ClassicAC/B36.htm

http://www.air-and-space.com/peacemkr.htm

they started design and production on the B-36 in the 40's to bad it never saw action in ww2 or the cold war or any other wars:aok

J_A_B · « **Reply #1 on:** November 07, 2005, 10:51:53 PM »

"to bad it never saw action in ww2 or the cold war or any other wars"

Be very happy that it never saw action.

J_A_B

Vulcan · « **Reply #2 on:** November 07, 2005, 10:52:01 PM »

Quote

B-36H serial number 51-5712 was modified as a nuclear-reactor testbed. The object of this particular conversion was to test the effects of
nuclear reactor radiation on instruments, equipment, and airframe and to study shielding methods.
A nuclear reactor (which did not actually power the aircraft) was mounted in the aft bomb bay. The crew was housed entirely in a modified
compartment in the fuselage nose section. The compartment was composed of lead and rubber, and entirely surrounded the crew.
The aircraft was redesignated NB-36H. It bore the name Crusader on the fuselage side. Its first flight was made on September 17, 1955.
Flying alongside the NB-36H on every one of its flights was a C-97 transport carrying a platoon of armed Marines
ready to parachute down and surround the test aircraft in case it crashed. A total of 47 flights were made up to March of 1957.

RAIDER14 · « **Reply #3 on:** November 07, 2005, 11:00:54 PM »

Quote

Be very happy that it never saw action.

yeah good thing it didn't see action in the cold war becuase if it did there would be no aces high for any 1 to play today becuase if it was used that would have been only in all out nuclear warfare which would result in billions of lives lost

rpm · « **Reply #4 on:** November 07, 2005, 11:25:07 PM »

Carswell and The Last B-36 Carswell was designed for the B-36. It had the longest, heaviest, concrete runway at the time to handle the take-off load of the B-36.

Debonair · « **Reply #5 on:** November 07, 2005, 11:43:14 PM »

The transport version XC-99 was just as impressive.
747 capabilities of 400 passengers & 7000nm range in the 1940s, but at half the speed.
early experimental B-36 landing gear....

Simlar gear on a P-40

Wolfala · « **Reply #6 on:** November 07, 2005, 11:56:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Vulcan

If I remember correctly - the reactor was fired up at altitude - and the pod'd turbines designed by GE were dual fuel. They could burn fuel and when the reactor spooled up, switched over to a closed cycle loop and could run the turbines off the reactor via heat exchangers.

cpxxx · « **Reply #7 on:** November 08, 2005, 08:50:56 AM »

Saw 'Strategic Air Command' again recently. The B36 features heavily. The film is worth buying for those sequences alone.

Replicant · « **Reply #8 on:** November 08, 2005, 12:45:03 PM »

...and when compared to a B29!

Seagoon · « **Reply #9 on:** November 08, 2005, 01:34:41 PM »

Just be glad you don't have to try to shoot it down with .50 cal ammo in Aces High.

Now that would be the Uber Perk.

- SEAGOON